Cargando…

Prognostic Value and Clinicopathological Differences of HIFs in Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of HIFs in colorectal cancer was evaluated in a large number of studies, but the conclusions were inconclusive. Meanwhile, clinicopathologic differences of HIF-1α and HIF-2α were rarely compared in recent studies. METHODOLOGY: Identical search strategies were used to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Zhigang, He, Xin, Xia, Wenjie, Huang, Qi, Zhang, Zhigang, Ye, Jun, Ni, Chao, Wu, Pin, Wu, Dang, Xu, Jinghong, Qiu, Fuming, Huang, Jian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080337
_version_ 1782294947602366464
author Chen, Zhigang
He, Xin
Xia, Wenjie
Huang, Qi
Zhang, Zhigang
Ye, Jun
Ni, Chao
Wu, Pin
Wu, Dang
Xu, Jinghong
Qiu, Fuming
Huang, Jian
author_facet Chen, Zhigang
He, Xin
Xia, Wenjie
Huang, Qi
Zhang, Zhigang
Ye, Jun
Ni, Chao
Wu, Pin
Wu, Dang
Xu, Jinghong
Qiu, Fuming
Huang, Jian
author_sort Chen, Zhigang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of HIFs in colorectal cancer was evaluated in a large number of studies, but the conclusions were inconclusive. Meanwhile, clinicopathologic differences of HIF-1α and HIF-2α were rarely compared in recent studies. METHODOLOGY: Identical search strategies were used to search relevant literatures in the PubMed and Web of Science databases. The prognostic significances and clinicopathological differences of HIFs in CRC were analyzed. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of 23studies comprising 2984 CRC patients met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated that overexpressed HIFs were significantly associated with increase of mortality risk, including overall survival (OS) (HR 2.06 95%CI 1.55–2.74) and disease free survival (HR 2.84, 95%CI 1.87–4.31). Subgroup analysis revealed that both overexpressed HIF-1α and HIF-2α had correlations with worse prognosis. The pooled HRs were 2.01 (95% CI: 1.55–2.6) and 2.07(95% CI: 1.01–4.26). Further subgroup analysis on HIF-1α was performed by study location, number of patients, quality score and cut-off value. The results showed that HIF-1α overexpression was significantly associated with poor OS, particularly in Asian countries (HR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.74–3.01), while not in European or other countries. In addition, overexpression of HIF-1α was closely related with these clinicopathological features, including Dukes' stages (OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.17–0.89), UICC stages (OR 0.42 95% CI: 0.3–0.59), depth of invasion (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.51–0.99), lymphnode status (OR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32–0.73) and metastasis (OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11–0.81). While overexpression of HIF-2α was only associated with grade of differentiation (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.29–0.81). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that both HIF-1α and HIF-2α overexpression were associated with an unfavorable prognosis. HIF-1α overexpression seemed to be associated with worse prognosis in Asian countries. Additionally, HIF-1α and HIF-2α indicated distinct clinicopathologic features.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3855620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38556202013-12-09 Prognostic Value and Clinicopathological Differences of HIFs in Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from Meta-Analysis Chen, Zhigang He, Xin Xia, Wenjie Huang, Qi Zhang, Zhigang Ye, Jun Ni, Chao Wu, Pin Wu, Dang Xu, Jinghong Qiu, Fuming Huang, Jian PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of HIFs in colorectal cancer was evaluated in a large number of studies, but the conclusions were inconclusive. Meanwhile, clinicopathologic differences of HIF-1α and HIF-2α were rarely compared in recent studies. METHODOLOGY: Identical search strategies were used to search relevant literatures in the PubMed and Web of Science databases. The prognostic significances and clinicopathological differences of HIFs in CRC were analyzed. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of 23studies comprising 2984 CRC patients met the inclusion criteria. The results indicated that overexpressed HIFs were significantly associated with increase of mortality risk, including overall survival (OS) (HR 2.06 95%CI 1.55–2.74) and disease free survival (HR 2.84, 95%CI 1.87–4.31). Subgroup analysis revealed that both overexpressed HIF-1α and HIF-2α had correlations with worse prognosis. The pooled HRs were 2.01 (95% CI: 1.55–2.6) and 2.07(95% CI: 1.01–4.26). Further subgroup analysis on HIF-1α was performed by study location, number of patients, quality score and cut-off value. The results showed that HIF-1α overexpression was significantly associated with poor OS, particularly in Asian countries (HR 2.3, 95% CI: 1.74–3.01), while not in European or other countries. In addition, overexpression of HIF-1α was closely related with these clinicopathological features, including Dukes' stages (OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.17–0.89), UICC stages (OR 0.42 95% CI: 0.3–0.59), depth of invasion (OR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.51–0.99), lymphnode status (OR 0.49, 95% CI: 0.32–0.73) and metastasis (OR 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11–0.81). While overexpression of HIF-2α was only associated with grade of differentiation (OR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.29–0.81). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that both HIF-1α and HIF-2α overexpression were associated with an unfavorable prognosis. HIF-1α overexpression seemed to be associated with worse prognosis in Asian countries. Additionally, HIF-1α and HIF-2α indicated distinct clinicopathologic features. Public Library of Science 2013-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3855620/ /pubmed/24324596 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080337 Text en © 2013 Chen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chen, Zhigang
He, Xin
Xia, Wenjie
Huang, Qi
Zhang, Zhigang
Ye, Jun
Ni, Chao
Wu, Pin
Wu, Dang
Xu, Jinghong
Qiu, Fuming
Huang, Jian
Prognostic Value and Clinicopathological Differences of HIFs in Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from Meta-Analysis
title Prognostic Value and Clinicopathological Differences of HIFs in Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from Meta-Analysis
title_full Prognostic Value and Clinicopathological Differences of HIFs in Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic Value and Clinicopathological Differences of HIFs in Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value and Clinicopathological Differences of HIFs in Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from Meta-Analysis
title_short Prognostic Value and Clinicopathological Differences of HIFs in Colorectal Cancer: Evidence from Meta-Analysis
title_sort prognostic value and clinicopathological differences of hifs in colorectal cancer: evidence from meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324596
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080337
work_keys_str_mv AT chenzhigang prognosticvalueandclinicopathologicaldifferencesofhifsincolorectalcancerevidencefrommetaanalysis
AT hexin prognosticvalueandclinicopathologicaldifferencesofhifsincolorectalcancerevidencefrommetaanalysis
AT xiawenjie prognosticvalueandclinicopathologicaldifferencesofhifsincolorectalcancerevidencefrommetaanalysis
AT huangqi prognosticvalueandclinicopathologicaldifferencesofhifsincolorectalcancerevidencefrommetaanalysis
AT zhangzhigang prognosticvalueandclinicopathologicaldifferencesofhifsincolorectalcancerevidencefrommetaanalysis
AT yejun prognosticvalueandclinicopathologicaldifferencesofhifsincolorectalcancerevidencefrommetaanalysis
AT nichao prognosticvalueandclinicopathologicaldifferencesofhifsincolorectalcancerevidencefrommetaanalysis
AT wupin prognosticvalueandclinicopathologicaldifferencesofhifsincolorectalcancerevidencefrommetaanalysis
AT wudang prognosticvalueandclinicopathologicaldifferencesofhifsincolorectalcancerevidencefrommetaanalysis
AT xujinghong prognosticvalueandclinicopathologicaldifferencesofhifsincolorectalcancerevidencefrommetaanalysis
AT qiufuming prognosticvalueandclinicopathologicaldifferencesofhifsincolorectalcancerevidencefrommetaanalysis
AT huangjian prognosticvalueandclinicopathologicaldifferencesofhifsincolorectalcancerevidencefrommetaanalysis