Cargando…

Management of Open Abdomen: Single Center Experience

Aim. The authors reviewed their experience in the management of open abdomen using the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC), in order to assess its morbidity, and the outcome of abdominal wall integrity. Methods. A retrospective review was performed using the trauma registry to identify patients undergoing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yanar, Hakan, Sivrikoz, Emre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24348537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/584378
_version_ 1782294995745636352
author Yanar, Hakan
Sivrikoz, Emre
author_facet Yanar, Hakan
Sivrikoz, Emre
author_sort Yanar, Hakan
collection PubMed
description Aim. The authors reviewed their experience in the management of open abdomen using the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC), in order to assess its morbidity, and the outcome of abdominal wall integrity. Methods. A retrospective review was performed using the trauma registry to identify patients undergoing temporary abdominal closure (TAC) either using Bogota Bag (BB) or VAC, from January 2006 to December 2012. Inclusion criteria were TAC and survival to definitive abdominal closure. Data collected included age, indication for TAC, number of operating room procedures, primary fascial closure rate, and complications. Results. During the study period, 156 patients required one type of TAC. Mean number of operations required in BB group was 3.04 as compared to 1.96 in VAC group (P = 0.006). Survival was significantly increased in the VAC group (P < 0.001). The difference in primary closure rates did not reach statistical significance (25% vs. 55%; P = 0.074). Complications were observed less frequently in the VAC group (P = 0.047). The mean time for fascial closure was 21 (±12) days in the BB group, as opposed to 6 (±3) days in the VAC group (P < 0.001). Conclusion. The vacuum assisted closure (VAC) has a significantly faster rate of closure, requires less number of operations, and is associated with a lower complication rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3855993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38559932013-12-17 Management of Open Abdomen: Single Center Experience Yanar, Hakan Sivrikoz, Emre Gastroenterol Res Pract Clinical Study Aim. The authors reviewed their experience in the management of open abdomen using the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC), in order to assess its morbidity, and the outcome of abdominal wall integrity. Methods. A retrospective review was performed using the trauma registry to identify patients undergoing temporary abdominal closure (TAC) either using Bogota Bag (BB) or VAC, from January 2006 to December 2012. Inclusion criteria were TAC and survival to definitive abdominal closure. Data collected included age, indication for TAC, number of operating room procedures, primary fascial closure rate, and complications. Results. During the study period, 156 patients required one type of TAC. Mean number of operations required in BB group was 3.04 as compared to 1.96 in VAC group (P = 0.006). Survival was significantly increased in the VAC group (P < 0.001). The difference in primary closure rates did not reach statistical significance (25% vs. 55%; P = 0.074). Complications were observed less frequently in the VAC group (P = 0.047). The mean time for fascial closure was 21 (±12) days in the BB group, as opposed to 6 (±3) days in the VAC group (P < 0.001). Conclusion. The vacuum assisted closure (VAC) has a significantly faster rate of closure, requires less number of operations, and is associated with a lower complication rate. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3855993/ /pubmed/24348537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/584378 Text en Copyright © 2013 H. Yanar and E. Sivrikoz. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Yanar, Hakan
Sivrikoz, Emre
Management of Open Abdomen: Single Center Experience
title Management of Open Abdomen: Single Center Experience
title_full Management of Open Abdomen: Single Center Experience
title_fullStr Management of Open Abdomen: Single Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Management of Open Abdomen: Single Center Experience
title_short Management of Open Abdomen: Single Center Experience
title_sort management of open abdomen: single center experience
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3855993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24348537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/584378
work_keys_str_mv AT yanarhakan managementofopenabdomensinglecenterexperience
AT sivrikozemre managementofopenabdomensinglecenterexperience