Cargando…

Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Non-randomised studies have suggested that the postoperative complications of (Campos LS, Limberger LF, Stein AT, Kalil AN) laparoscopic radical hysterectomy are similar to those in abdominal radical hysterectomy. However, no study evaluating postoperative pain comparing both techniques...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campos, Luciana Silveira, Francisco Limberger, Leo, Tetelbom Stein, Airton, Nocchi Kalil, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3856515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24028441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-293
_version_ 1782295076981964800
author Campos, Luciana Silveira
Francisco Limberger, Leo
Tetelbom Stein, Airton
Nocchi Kalil, Antonio
author_facet Campos, Luciana Silveira
Francisco Limberger, Leo
Tetelbom Stein, Airton
Nocchi Kalil, Antonio
author_sort Campos, Luciana Silveira
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Non-randomised studies have suggested that the postoperative complications of (Campos LS, Limberger LF, Stein AT, Kalil AN) laparoscopic radical hysterectomy are similar to those in abdominal radical hysterectomy. However, no study evaluating postoperative pain comparing both techniques has been published thus far. Our objective was to compare pain intensity and other perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in early cervical cancer. METHODS: This single centre, randomised, controlled trial enrolled 30 cervical cancer patients who were clinically staged IA2 with lymph vascular invasion and IB according to the FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) classification, and underwent LRH or ARH between late 1999 and early 2004. Postoperative pain, as measured by a 10-point numerical rate scale, was considered the primary endpoint. Postoperative pain was assessed every six hours during a patient’s usual postoperative care. Perioperative outcomes were also registered. Both surgical techniques were executed by the same surgical team. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and other postoperative surgicopathological factors and 5-year survival rates. RESULTS: IA2 patients with lymphatic vascular space invasion and IB cervical cancer patients were randomised to either the LRH group (16 patients) or the ARH group (14 patients). Four patients (25%) in the LRH group and 5 patients (36%) in the ARH group presented with transoperative or serious postoperative complications. All of the transoperative complications occurred in the LRH group. The relative risk of presenting with complications was 0.70; CI 95% (0.23–2.11); P = 0.694. LRH group mean pain score was significantly lower than ARH after 36 h of observation (P = 0.044; mean difference score: 1.42; 95% CI: 0.04–2.80). The survival results will be published elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: LRH provided lower pain scores after 36 h of observation in this series. The perioperative and serious postoperative complications ratios were comparable between the groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01258413
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3856515
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38565152013-12-10 Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial Campos, Luciana Silveira Francisco Limberger, Leo Tetelbom Stein, Airton Nocchi Kalil, Antonio Trials Research BACKGROUND: Non-randomised studies have suggested that the postoperative complications of (Campos LS, Limberger LF, Stein AT, Kalil AN) laparoscopic radical hysterectomy are similar to those in abdominal radical hysterectomy. However, no study evaluating postoperative pain comparing both techniques has been published thus far. Our objective was to compare pain intensity and other perioperative outcomes between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in early cervical cancer. METHODS: This single centre, randomised, controlled trial enrolled 30 cervical cancer patients who were clinically staged IA2 with lymph vascular invasion and IB according to the FIGO (International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics) classification, and underwent LRH or ARH between late 1999 and early 2004. Postoperative pain, as measured by a 10-point numerical rate scale, was considered the primary endpoint. Postoperative pain was assessed every six hours during a patient’s usual postoperative care. Perioperative outcomes were also registered. Both surgical techniques were executed by the same surgical team. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and other postoperative surgicopathological factors and 5-year survival rates. RESULTS: IA2 patients with lymphatic vascular space invasion and IB cervical cancer patients were randomised to either the LRH group (16 patients) or the ARH group (14 patients). Four patients (25%) in the LRH group and 5 patients (36%) in the ARH group presented with transoperative or serious postoperative complications. All of the transoperative complications occurred in the LRH group. The relative risk of presenting with complications was 0.70; CI 95% (0.23–2.11); P = 0.694. LRH group mean pain score was significantly lower than ARH after 36 h of observation (P = 0.044; mean difference score: 1.42; 95% CI: 0.04–2.80). The survival results will be published elsewhere. CONCLUSIONS: LRH provided lower pain scores after 36 h of observation in this series. The perioperative and serious postoperative complications ratios were comparable between the groups. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01258413 BioMed Central 2013-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3856515/ /pubmed/24028441 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-293 Text en Copyright © 2013 Campos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Campos, Luciana Silveira
Francisco Limberger, Leo
Tetelbom Stein, Airton
Nocchi Kalil, Antonio
Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial
title Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial
title_full Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial
title_short Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3856515/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24028441
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-293
work_keys_str_mv AT camposlucianasilveira postoperativepainandperioperativeoutcomesafterlaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyandabdominalradicalhysterectomyinpatientswithearlycervicalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT franciscolimbergerleo postoperativepainandperioperativeoutcomesafterlaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyandabdominalradicalhysterectomyinpatientswithearlycervicalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tetelbomsteinairton postoperativepainandperioperativeoutcomesafterlaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyandabdominalradicalhysterectomyinpatientswithearlycervicalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT nocchikalilantonio postoperativepainandperioperativeoutcomesafterlaparoscopicradicalhysterectomyandabdominalradicalhysterectomyinpatientswithearlycervicalcancerarandomisedcontrolledtrial