Cargando…

High genetic diversity is not essential for successful introduction

Some introduced populations thrive and evolve despite the presumed loss of diversity at introduction. We aimed to quantify the amount of genetic diversity retained at introduction in species that have shown evidence of adaptation to their introduced environments. Samples were taken from native and i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rollins, Lee A, Moles, Angela T, Lam, Serena, Buitenwerf, Robert, Buswell, Joanna M, Brandenburger, Claire R, Flores-Moreno, Habacuc, Nielsen, Knud B, Couchman, Ellen, Brown, Gordon S, Thomson, Fiona J, Hemmings, Frank, Frankham, Richard, Sherwin, William B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3856749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.824
_version_ 1782295100861186048
author Rollins, Lee A
Moles, Angela T
Lam, Serena
Buitenwerf, Robert
Buswell, Joanna M
Brandenburger, Claire R
Flores-Moreno, Habacuc
Nielsen, Knud B
Couchman, Ellen
Brown, Gordon S
Thomson, Fiona J
Hemmings, Frank
Frankham, Richard
Sherwin, William B
author_facet Rollins, Lee A
Moles, Angela T
Lam, Serena
Buitenwerf, Robert
Buswell, Joanna M
Brandenburger, Claire R
Flores-Moreno, Habacuc
Nielsen, Knud B
Couchman, Ellen
Brown, Gordon S
Thomson, Fiona J
Hemmings, Frank
Frankham, Richard
Sherwin, William B
author_sort Rollins, Lee A
collection PubMed
description Some introduced populations thrive and evolve despite the presumed loss of diversity at introduction. We aimed to quantify the amount of genetic diversity retained at introduction in species that have shown evidence of adaptation to their introduced environments. Samples were taken from native and introduced ranges of Arctotheca populifolia and Petrorhagia nanteuilii. Using microsatellite data, we identified the source for each introduction, estimated genetic diversity in native and introduced populations, and calculated the amount of diversity retained in introduced populations. These values were compared to those from a literature review of diversity in native, confamilial populations and to estimates of genetic diversity retained at introduction. Gene diversity in the native range of both species was significantly lower than for confamilials. We found that, on average, introduced populations showing evidence of adaptation to their new environments retained 81% of the genetic diversity from the native range. Introduced populations of P. nanteuilii had higher genetic diversity than found in the native source populations, whereas introduced populations of A. populifolia retained only 14% of its native diversity in one introduction and 1% in another. Our literature review has shown that most introductions demonstrating adaptive ability have lost diversity upon introduction. The two species studied here had exceptionally low native range genetic diversity. Further, the two introductions of A. populifolia represent the largest percentage loss of genetic diversity in a species showing evidence of substantial morphological change in the introduced range. While high genetic diversity may increase the likelihood of invasion success, the species examined here adapted to their new environments with very little neutral genetic diversity. This finding suggests that even introductions founded by small numbers of individuals have the potential to become invasive.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3856749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38567492013-12-11 High genetic diversity is not essential for successful introduction Rollins, Lee A Moles, Angela T Lam, Serena Buitenwerf, Robert Buswell, Joanna M Brandenburger, Claire R Flores-Moreno, Habacuc Nielsen, Knud B Couchman, Ellen Brown, Gordon S Thomson, Fiona J Hemmings, Frank Frankham, Richard Sherwin, William B Ecol Evol Original Research Some introduced populations thrive and evolve despite the presumed loss of diversity at introduction. We aimed to quantify the amount of genetic diversity retained at introduction in species that have shown evidence of adaptation to their introduced environments. Samples were taken from native and introduced ranges of Arctotheca populifolia and Petrorhagia nanteuilii. Using microsatellite data, we identified the source for each introduction, estimated genetic diversity in native and introduced populations, and calculated the amount of diversity retained in introduced populations. These values were compared to those from a literature review of diversity in native, confamilial populations and to estimates of genetic diversity retained at introduction. Gene diversity in the native range of both species was significantly lower than for confamilials. We found that, on average, introduced populations showing evidence of adaptation to their new environments retained 81% of the genetic diversity from the native range. Introduced populations of P. nanteuilii had higher genetic diversity than found in the native source populations, whereas introduced populations of A. populifolia retained only 14% of its native diversity in one introduction and 1% in another. Our literature review has shown that most introductions demonstrating adaptive ability have lost diversity upon introduction. The two species studied here had exceptionally low native range genetic diversity. Further, the two introductions of A. populifolia represent the largest percentage loss of genetic diversity in a species showing evidence of substantial morphological change in the introduced range. While high genetic diversity may increase the likelihood of invasion success, the species examined here adapted to their new environments with very little neutral genetic diversity. This finding suggests that even introductions founded by small numbers of individuals have the potential to become invasive. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2013-11 2013-10-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3856749/ /pubmed/24340190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.824 Text en © 2013 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Original Research
Rollins, Lee A
Moles, Angela T
Lam, Serena
Buitenwerf, Robert
Buswell, Joanna M
Brandenburger, Claire R
Flores-Moreno, Habacuc
Nielsen, Knud B
Couchman, Ellen
Brown, Gordon S
Thomson, Fiona J
Hemmings, Frank
Frankham, Richard
Sherwin, William B
High genetic diversity is not essential for successful introduction
title High genetic diversity is not essential for successful introduction
title_full High genetic diversity is not essential for successful introduction
title_fullStr High genetic diversity is not essential for successful introduction
title_full_unstemmed High genetic diversity is not essential for successful introduction
title_short High genetic diversity is not essential for successful introduction
title_sort high genetic diversity is not essential for successful introduction
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3856749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.824
work_keys_str_mv AT rollinsleea highgeneticdiversityisnotessentialforsuccessfulintroduction
AT molesangelat highgeneticdiversityisnotessentialforsuccessfulintroduction
AT lamserena highgeneticdiversityisnotessentialforsuccessfulintroduction
AT buitenwerfrobert highgeneticdiversityisnotessentialforsuccessfulintroduction
AT buswelljoannam highgeneticdiversityisnotessentialforsuccessfulintroduction
AT brandenburgerclairer highgeneticdiversityisnotessentialforsuccessfulintroduction
AT floresmorenohabacuc highgeneticdiversityisnotessentialforsuccessfulintroduction
AT nielsenknudb highgeneticdiversityisnotessentialforsuccessfulintroduction
AT couchmanellen highgeneticdiversityisnotessentialforsuccessfulintroduction
AT browngordons highgeneticdiversityisnotessentialforsuccessfulintroduction
AT thomsonfionaj highgeneticdiversityisnotessentialforsuccessfulintroduction
AT hemmingsfrank highgeneticdiversityisnotessentialforsuccessfulintroduction
AT frankhamrichard highgeneticdiversityisnotessentialforsuccessfulintroduction
AT sherwinwilliamb highgeneticdiversityisnotessentialforsuccessfulintroduction