Cargando…

ICA model order selection of task co-activation networks

Independent component analysis (ICA) has become a widely used method for extracting functional networks in the brain during rest and task. Historically, preferred ICA dimensionality has widely varied within the neuroimaging community, but typically varies between 20 and 100 components. This can be p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ray, Kimberly L., McKay, D. Reese, Fox, Peter M., Riedel, Michael C., Uecker, Angela M., Beckmann, Christian F., Smith, Stephen M., Fox, Peter T., Laird, Angela R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24339802
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00237
_version_ 1782295176714125312
author Ray, Kimberly L.
McKay, D. Reese
Fox, Peter M.
Riedel, Michael C.
Uecker, Angela M.
Beckmann, Christian F.
Smith, Stephen M.
Fox, Peter T.
Laird, Angela R.
author_facet Ray, Kimberly L.
McKay, D. Reese
Fox, Peter M.
Riedel, Michael C.
Uecker, Angela M.
Beckmann, Christian F.
Smith, Stephen M.
Fox, Peter T.
Laird, Angela R.
author_sort Ray, Kimberly L.
collection PubMed
description Independent component analysis (ICA) has become a widely used method for extracting functional networks in the brain during rest and task. Historically, preferred ICA dimensionality has widely varied within the neuroimaging community, but typically varies between 20 and 100 components. This can be problematic when comparing results across multiple studies because of the impact ICA dimensionality has on the topology of its resultant components. Recent studies have demonstrated that ICA can be applied to peak activation coordinates archived in a large neuroimaging database (i.e., BrainMap Database) to yield whole-brain task-based co-activation networks. A strength of applying ICA to BrainMap data is that the vast amount of metadata in BrainMap can be used to quantitatively assess tasks and cognitive processes contributing to each component. In this study, we investigated the effect of model order on the distribution of functional properties across networks as a method for identifying the most informative decompositions of BrainMap-based ICA components. Our findings suggest dimensionality of 20 for low model order ICA to examine large-scale brain networks, and dimensionality of 70 to provide insight into how large-scale networks fractionate into sub-networks. We also provide a functional and organizational assessment of visual, motor, emotion, and interoceptive task co-activation networks as they fractionate from low to high model-orders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3857551
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38575512013-12-11 ICA model order selection of task co-activation networks Ray, Kimberly L. McKay, D. Reese Fox, Peter M. Riedel, Michael C. Uecker, Angela M. Beckmann, Christian F. Smith, Stephen M. Fox, Peter T. Laird, Angela R. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Independent component analysis (ICA) has become a widely used method for extracting functional networks in the brain during rest and task. Historically, preferred ICA dimensionality has widely varied within the neuroimaging community, but typically varies between 20 and 100 components. This can be problematic when comparing results across multiple studies because of the impact ICA dimensionality has on the topology of its resultant components. Recent studies have demonstrated that ICA can be applied to peak activation coordinates archived in a large neuroimaging database (i.e., BrainMap Database) to yield whole-brain task-based co-activation networks. A strength of applying ICA to BrainMap data is that the vast amount of metadata in BrainMap can be used to quantitatively assess tasks and cognitive processes contributing to each component. In this study, we investigated the effect of model order on the distribution of functional properties across networks as a method for identifying the most informative decompositions of BrainMap-based ICA components. Our findings suggest dimensionality of 20 for low model order ICA to examine large-scale brain networks, and dimensionality of 70 to provide insight into how large-scale networks fractionate into sub-networks. We also provide a functional and organizational assessment of visual, motor, emotion, and interoceptive task co-activation networks as they fractionate from low to high model-orders. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3857551/ /pubmed/24339802 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00237 Text en Copyright © 2013 Ray, McKay, Fox, Riedel, Uecker, Beckmann, Smith, Fox and Laird. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Ray, Kimberly L.
McKay, D. Reese
Fox, Peter M.
Riedel, Michael C.
Uecker, Angela M.
Beckmann, Christian F.
Smith, Stephen M.
Fox, Peter T.
Laird, Angela R.
ICA model order selection of task co-activation networks
title ICA model order selection of task co-activation networks
title_full ICA model order selection of task co-activation networks
title_fullStr ICA model order selection of task co-activation networks
title_full_unstemmed ICA model order selection of task co-activation networks
title_short ICA model order selection of task co-activation networks
title_sort ica model order selection of task co-activation networks
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857551/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24339802
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00237
work_keys_str_mv AT raykimberlyl icamodelorderselectionoftaskcoactivationnetworks
AT mckaydreese icamodelorderselectionoftaskcoactivationnetworks
AT foxpeterm icamodelorderselectionoftaskcoactivationnetworks
AT riedelmichaelc icamodelorderselectionoftaskcoactivationnetworks
AT ueckerangelam icamodelorderselectionoftaskcoactivationnetworks
AT beckmannchristianf icamodelorderselectionoftaskcoactivationnetworks
AT smithstephenm icamodelorderselectionoftaskcoactivationnetworks
AT foxpetert icamodelorderselectionoftaskcoactivationnetworks
AT lairdangelar icamodelorderselectionoftaskcoactivationnetworks