Cargando…

The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography

In this study two analytical methods, one based on matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD) and the other on liquid–solid extraction (LSE), coupled with gas chromatography, were evaluated and used to determine the presence of 163 pesticides (6 acaricides, 62 fungicides, 18 herbicides and 77 insecticides...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Łozowicka, Bożena, Jankowska, Magdalena, Rutkowska, Ewa, Hrynko, Izabela, Kaczyński, Piotr, Miciński, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Japan 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23670401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11418-013-0777-9
_version_ 1782295212265046016
author Łozowicka, Bożena
Jankowska, Magdalena
Rutkowska, Ewa
Hrynko, Izabela
Kaczyński, Piotr
Miciński, Jan
author_facet Łozowicka, Bożena
Jankowska, Magdalena
Rutkowska, Ewa
Hrynko, Izabela
Kaczyński, Piotr
Miciński, Jan
author_sort Łozowicka, Bożena
collection PubMed
description In this study two analytical methods, one based on matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD) and the other on liquid–solid extraction (LSE), coupled with gas chromatography, were evaluated and used to determine the presence of 163 pesticides (6 acaricides, 62 fungicides, 18 herbicides and 77 insecticides) in various herbs. Both methods were optimized considering different parameters (sample to sorbent mass ratio, extracting solvent, sorbents for clean-up step, etc.). The results of these validated sample preparation procedures were compared. Under optimum conditions, the mean recoveries obtained were in the range of 70–119 % for MSPD for most pesticides and 70–118 % for LSE, but with several exceptions. Precision values, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), were ≤16 % for MSPD and <18 % for LSE. Correlation coefficients were higher than 0.99254 for both methods. LODs (limits of detection) and LOQs (limits of quantification) for MSPD were within the ranges of 0.003–0.03 and 0.005–0.04 mg/kg, respectively. The data demonstrate that the MSPD method was successfully used for the analysis of 163 pesticides in the following herbs: chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.), linden (Tilia), lungwort (Pulmonaria L.), melissa (Melissa L.), peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). This paper indicates the potential of MSPD for qualitative and quantitative analysis of pesticide residues. This method was therefore validated at three spiking levels (the first ranging from 0.005 to 0.05 mg/kg, the second from 0.05 to 0.5 mg/kg and the third from 0.25 to 2.5 mg/kg) and applied to real samples (n = 15). MSPD proves to be a simple, fast and very useful multiresidue method and can be recommended for routine pesticide monitoring studies in various herbs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3857878
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Japan
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38578782013-12-11 The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography Łozowicka, Bożena Jankowska, Magdalena Rutkowska, Ewa Hrynko, Izabela Kaczyński, Piotr Miciński, Jan J Nat Med Original Paper In this study two analytical methods, one based on matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD) and the other on liquid–solid extraction (LSE), coupled with gas chromatography, were evaluated and used to determine the presence of 163 pesticides (6 acaricides, 62 fungicides, 18 herbicides and 77 insecticides) in various herbs. Both methods were optimized considering different parameters (sample to sorbent mass ratio, extracting solvent, sorbents for clean-up step, etc.). The results of these validated sample preparation procedures were compared. Under optimum conditions, the mean recoveries obtained were in the range of 70–119 % for MSPD for most pesticides and 70–118 % for LSE, but with several exceptions. Precision values, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), were ≤16 % for MSPD and <18 % for LSE. Correlation coefficients were higher than 0.99254 for both methods. LODs (limits of detection) and LOQs (limits of quantification) for MSPD were within the ranges of 0.003–0.03 and 0.005–0.04 mg/kg, respectively. The data demonstrate that the MSPD method was successfully used for the analysis of 163 pesticides in the following herbs: chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.), linden (Tilia), lungwort (Pulmonaria L.), melissa (Melissa L.), peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). This paper indicates the potential of MSPD for qualitative and quantitative analysis of pesticide residues. This method was therefore validated at three spiking levels (the first ranging from 0.005 to 0.05 mg/kg, the second from 0.05 to 0.5 mg/kg and the third from 0.25 to 2.5 mg/kg) and applied to real samples (n = 15). MSPD proves to be a simple, fast and very useful multiresidue method and can be recommended for routine pesticide monitoring studies in various herbs. Springer Japan 2013-05-14 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3857878/ /pubmed/23670401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11418-013-0777-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Łozowicka, Bożena
Jankowska, Magdalena
Rutkowska, Ewa
Hrynko, Izabela
Kaczyński, Piotr
Miciński, Jan
The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography
title The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography
title_full The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography
title_fullStr The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography
title_short The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography
title_sort evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857878/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23670401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11418-013-0777-9
work_keys_str_mv AT łozowickabozena theevaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography
AT jankowskamagdalena theevaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography
AT rutkowskaewa theevaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography
AT hrynkoizabela theevaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography
AT kaczynskipiotr theevaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography
AT micinskijan theevaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography
AT łozowickabozena evaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography
AT jankowskamagdalena evaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography
AT rutkowskaewa evaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography
AT hrynkoizabela evaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography
AT kaczynskipiotr evaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography
AT micinskijan evaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography