Cargando…
The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography
In this study two analytical methods, one based on matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD) and the other on liquid–solid extraction (LSE), coupled with gas chromatography, were evaluated and used to determine the presence of 163 pesticides (6 acaricides, 62 fungicides, 18 herbicides and 77 insecticides...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Japan
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23670401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11418-013-0777-9 |
_version_ | 1782295212265046016 |
---|---|
author | Łozowicka, Bożena Jankowska, Magdalena Rutkowska, Ewa Hrynko, Izabela Kaczyński, Piotr Miciński, Jan |
author_facet | Łozowicka, Bożena Jankowska, Magdalena Rutkowska, Ewa Hrynko, Izabela Kaczyński, Piotr Miciński, Jan |
author_sort | Łozowicka, Bożena |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this study two analytical methods, one based on matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD) and the other on liquid–solid extraction (LSE), coupled with gas chromatography, were evaluated and used to determine the presence of 163 pesticides (6 acaricides, 62 fungicides, 18 herbicides and 77 insecticides) in various herbs. Both methods were optimized considering different parameters (sample to sorbent mass ratio, extracting solvent, sorbents for clean-up step, etc.). The results of these validated sample preparation procedures were compared. Under optimum conditions, the mean recoveries obtained were in the range of 70–119 % for MSPD for most pesticides and 70–118 % for LSE, but with several exceptions. Precision values, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), were ≤16 % for MSPD and <18 % for LSE. Correlation coefficients were higher than 0.99254 for both methods. LODs (limits of detection) and LOQs (limits of quantification) for MSPD were within the ranges of 0.003–0.03 and 0.005–0.04 mg/kg, respectively. The data demonstrate that the MSPD method was successfully used for the analysis of 163 pesticides in the following herbs: chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.), linden (Tilia), lungwort (Pulmonaria L.), melissa (Melissa L.), peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). This paper indicates the potential of MSPD for qualitative and quantitative analysis of pesticide residues. This method was therefore validated at three spiking levels (the first ranging from 0.005 to 0.05 mg/kg, the second from 0.05 to 0.5 mg/kg and the third from 0.25 to 2.5 mg/kg) and applied to real samples (n = 15). MSPD proves to be a simple, fast and very useful multiresidue method and can be recommended for routine pesticide monitoring studies in various herbs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3857878 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Springer Japan |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38578782013-12-11 The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography Łozowicka, Bożena Jankowska, Magdalena Rutkowska, Ewa Hrynko, Izabela Kaczyński, Piotr Miciński, Jan J Nat Med Original Paper In this study two analytical methods, one based on matrix solid phase dispersion (MSPD) and the other on liquid–solid extraction (LSE), coupled with gas chromatography, were evaluated and used to determine the presence of 163 pesticides (6 acaricides, 62 fungicides, 18 herbicides and 77 insecticides) in various herbs. Both methods were optimized considering different parameters (sample to sorbent mass ratio, extracting solvent, sorbents for clean-up step, etc.). The results of these validated sample preparation procedures were compared. Under optimum conditions, the mean recoveries obtained were in the range of 70–119 % for MSPD for most pesticides and 70–118 % for LSE, but with several exceptions. Precision values, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), were ≤16 % for MSPD and <18 % for LSE. Correlation coefficients were higher than 0.99254 for both methods. LODs (limits of detection) and LOQs (limits of quantification) for MSPD were within the ranges of 0.003–0.03 and 0.005–0.04 mg/kg, respectively. The data demonstrate that the MSPD method was successfully used for the analysis of 163 pesticides in the following herbs: chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L.), linden (Tilia), lungwort (Pulmonaria L.), melissa (Melissa L.), peppermint (Mentha piperita L.) and thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.). This paper indicates the potential of MSPD for qualitative and quantitative analysis of pesticide residues. This method was therefore validated at three spiking levels (the first ranging from 0.005 to 0.05 mg/kg, the second from 0.05 to 0.5 mg/kg and the third from 0.25 to 2.5 mg/kg) and applied to real samples (n = 15). MSPD proves to be a simple, fast and very useful multiresidue method and can be recommended for routine pesticide monitoring studies in various herbs. Springer Japan 2013-05-14 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3857878/ /pubmed/23670401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11418-013-0777-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Łozowicka, Bożena Jankowska, Magdalena Rutkowska, Ewa Hrynko, Izabela Kaczyński, Piotr Miciński, Jan The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography |
title | The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography |
title_full | The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography |
title_fullStr | The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography |
title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography |
title_short | The evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography |
title_sort | evaluation of a fast and simple pesticide multiresidue method in various herbs by gas chromatography |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857878/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23670401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11418-013-0777-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT łozowickabozena theevaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography AT jankowskamagdalena theevaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography AT rutkowskaewa theevaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography AT hrynkoizabela theevaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography AT kaczynskipiotr theevaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography AT micinskijan theevaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography AT łozowickabozena evaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography AT jankowskamagdalena evaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography AT rutkowskaewa evaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography AT hrynkoizabela evaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography AT kaczynskipiotr evaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography AT micinskijan evaluationofafastandsimplepesticidemultiresiduemethodinvariousherbsbygaschromatography |