Cargando…
Test Samples for Optimizing STORM Super-Resolution Microscopy
STORM is a recently developed super-resolution microscopy technique with up to 10 times better resolution than standard fluorescence microscopy techniques. However, as the image is acquired in a very different way than normal, by building up an image molecule-by-molecule, there are some significant...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MyJove Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24056752 http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/50579 |
_version_ | 1782295215213641728 |
---|---|
author | Metcalf, Daniel J. Edwards, Rebecca Kumarswami, Neelam Knight, Alex E. |
author_facet | Metcalf, Daniel J. Edwards, Rebecca Kumarswami, Neelam Knight, Alex E. |
author_sort | Metcalf, Daniel J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | STORM is a recently developed super-resolution microscopy technique with up to 10 times better resolution than standard fluorescence microscopy techniques. However, as the image is acquired in a very different way than normal, by building up an image molecule-by-molecule, there are some significant challenges for users in trying to optimize their image acquisition. In order to aid this process and gain more insight into how STORM works we present the preparation of 3 test samples and the methodology of acquiring and processing STORM super-resolution images with typical resolutions of between 30-50 nm. By combining the test samples with the use of the freely available rainSTORM processing software it is possible to obtain a great deal of information about image quality and resolution. Using these metrics it is then possible to optimize the imaging procedure from the optics, to sample preparation, dye choice, buffer conditions, and image acquisition settings. We also show examples of some common problems that result in poor image quality, such as lateral drift, where the sample moves during image acquisition and density related problems resulting in the 'mislocalization' phenomenon. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3857894 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | MyJove Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38578942013-12-18 Test Samples for Optimizing STORM Super-Resolution Microscopy Metcalf, Daniel J. Edwards, Rebecca Kumarswami, Neelam Knight, Alex E. J Vis Exp Molecular Biology STORM is a recently developed super-resolution microscopy technique with up to 10 times better resolution than standard fluorescence microscopy techniques. However, as the image is acquired in a very different way than normal, by building up an image molecule-by-molecule, there are some significant challenges for users in trying to optimize their image acquisition. In order to aid this process and gain more insight into how STORM works we present the preparation of 3 test samples and the methodology of acquiring and processing STORM super-resolution images with typical resolutions of between 30-50 nm. By combining the test samples with the use of the freely available rainSTORM processing software it is possible to obtain a great deal of information about image quality and resolution. Using these metrics it is then possible to optimize the imaging procedure from the optics, to sample preparation, dye choice, buffer conditions, and image acquisition settings. We also show examples of some common problems that result in poor image quality, such as lateral drift, where the sample moves during image acquisition and density related problems resulting in the 'mislocalization' phenomenon. MyJove Corporation 2013-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3857894/ /pubmed/24056752 http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/50579 Text en Copyright © 2013, Journal of Visualized Experiments http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Molecular Biology Metcalf, Daniel J. Edwards, Rebecca Kumarswami, Neelam Knight, Alex E. Test Samples for Optimizing STORM Super-Resolution Microscopy |
title | Test Samples for Optimizing STORM Super-Resolution Microscopy |
title_full | Test Samples for Optimizing STORM Super-Resolution Microscopy |
title_fullStr | Test Samples for Optimizing STORM Super-Resolution Microscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Test Samples for Optimizing STORM Super-Resolution Microscopy |
title_short | Test Samples for Optimizing STORM Super-Resolution Microscopy |
title_sort | test samples for optimizing storm super-resolution microscopy |
topic | Molecular Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857894/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24056752 http://dx.doi.org/10.3791/50579 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT metcalfdanielj testsamplesforoptimizingstormsuperresolutionmicroscopy AT edwardsrebecca testsamplesforoptimizingstormsuperresolutionmicroscopy AT kumarswamineelam testsamplesforoptimizingstormsuperresolutionmicroscopy AT knightalexe testsamplesforoptimizingstormsuperresolutionmicroscopy |