Cargando…
Comparing Ovarian Radiation Doses in Flat-Panel and Conventional Angiography During Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Clinical Trial
BACKGROUND: Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a minimally invasive procedure performed under fluoroscopy for the treatment of uterine fibroids and accompanied by radiation exposure. OBJECTIVES: To compare ovarian radiation doses during uterine artery embolization (UAE) in patients using conventio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kowsar
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24348594 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.13264 |
_version_ | 1782295222068183040 |
---|---|
author | Firouznia, Kavous Ghanaati, Hossein Sharafi, Aliakbar Abahashemi, Firouze Hashemi, Hassan Jalali, Amir Hossein Shakiba, Madjid |
author_facet | Firouznia, Kavous Ghanaati, Hossein Sharafi, Aliakbar Abahashemi, Firouze Hashemi, Hassan Jalali, Amir Hossein Shakiba, Madjid |
author_sort | Firouznia, Kavous |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a minimally invasive procedure performed under fluoroscopy for the treatment of uterine fibroids and accompanied by radiation exposure. OBJECTIVES: To compare ovarian radiation doses during uterine artery embolization (UAE) in patients using conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with those using digital flat-panel technology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty women who were candidates for UAE were randomly enrolled for one of the two angiographic systems. Ovarian doses were calculated according to in-vitro phantom study results using entrance and exit doses and were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean right entrance dose was 1586±1221 mGy in the conventional and 522.3±400.1 mGy in the flat panel group (P=0.005). These figures were 1470±1170 mGy and 456±396 mGy, respectively for the left side (P=0.006). The mean right exit dose was 18.8±12.3 for the conventional and 9.4±6.4 mGy for the flat panel group (P=0.013). These figures were 16.7±11.3 and 10.2±7.2 mGy, respectively for the left side (P=0.06). The mean right ovarian dose was 139.9±92 in the conventional and 23.6±16.2 mGy in the flat panel group (P<0.0001). These figures were 101.7±77.6 and 24.6±16.9 mGy, respectively for the left side (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Flat panel system can significantly reduce the ovarian radiation dose during UAE compared with conventional DSA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3857971 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Kowsar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38579712013-12-12 Comparing Ovarian Radiation Doses in Flat-Panel and Conventional Angiography During Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Clinical Trial Firouznia, Kavous Ghanaati, Hossein Sharafi, Aliakbar Abahashemi, Firouze Hashemi, Hassan Jalali, Amir Hossein Shakiba, Madjid Iran J Radiol Vascular & Interventional Radiology BACKGROUND: Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a minimally invasive procedure performed under fluoroscopy for the treatment of uterine fibroids and accompanied by radiation exposure. OBJECTIVES: To compare ovarian radiation doses during uterine artery embolization (UAE) in patients using conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with those using digital flat-panel technology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty women who were candidates for UAE were randomly enrolled for one of the two angiographic systems. Ovarian doses were calculated according to in-vitro phantom study results using entrance and exit doses and were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The mean right entrance dose was 1586±1221 mGy in the conventional and 522.3±400.1 mGy in the flat panel group (P=0.005). These figures were 1470±1170 mGy and 456±396 mGy, respectively for the left side (P=0.006). The mean right exit dose was 18.8±12.3 for the conventional and 9.4±6.4 mGy for the flat panel group (P=0.013). These figures were 16.7±11.3 and 10.2±7.2 mGy, respectively for the left side (P=0.06). The mean right ovarian dose was 139.9±92 in the conventional and 23.6±16.2 mGy in the flat panel group (P<0.0001). These figures were 101.7±77.6 and 24.6±16.9 mGy, respectively for the left side (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: Flat panel system can significantly reduce the ovarian radiation dose during UAE compared with conventional DSA. Kowsar 2013-08-30 2013-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3857971/ /pubmed/24348594 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.13264 Text en Copyright © 2013, Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Iranian Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Vascular & Interventional Radiology Firouznia, Kavous Ghanaati, Hossein Sharafi, Aliakbar Abahashemi, Firouze Hashemi, Hassan Jalali, Amir Hossein Shakiba, Madjid Comparing Ovarian Radiation Doses in Flat-Panel and Conventional Angiography During Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title | Comparing Ovarian Radiation Doses in Flat-Panel and Conventional Angiography During Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full | Comparing Ovarian Radiation Doses in Flat-Panel and Conventional Angiography During Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparing Ovarian Radiation Doses in Flat-Panel and Conventional Angiography During Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Ovarian Radiation Doses in Flat-Panel and Conventional Angiography During Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_short | Comparing Ovarian Radiation Doses in Flat-Panel and Conventional Angiography During Uterine Artery Embolization: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
title_sort | comparing ovarian radiation doses in flat-panel and conventional angiography during uterine artery embolization: a randomized clinical trial |
topic | Vascular & Interventional Radiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3857971/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24348594 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.13264 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT firouzniakavous comparingovarianradiationdosesinflatpanelandconventionalangiographyduringuterinearteryembolizationarandomizedclinicaltrial AT ghanaatihossein comparingovarianradiationdosesinflatpanelandconventionalangiographyduringuterinearteryembolizationarandomizedclinicaltrial AT sharafialiakbar comparingovarianradiationdosesinflatpanelandconventionalangiographyduringuterinearteryembolizationarandomizedclinicaltrial AT abahashemifirouze comparingovarianradiationdosesinflatpanelandconventionalangiographyduringuterinearteryembolizationarandomizedclinicaltrial AT hashemihassan comparingovarianradiationdosesinflatpanelandconventionalangiographyduringuterinearteryembolizationarandomizedclinicaltrial AT jalaliamirhossein comparingovarianradiationdosesinflatpanelandconventionalangiographyduringuterinearteryembolizationarandomizedclinicaltrial AT shakibamadjid comparingovarianradiationdosesinflatpanelandconventionalangiographyduringuterinearteryembolizationarandomizedclinicaltrial |