Cargando…

Biomechanical Comparison of an Intramedullary and Extramedullary Free-Tissue Graft Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Joint Complex

BACKGROUND: Several different surgical techniques have been described to address the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments in acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. However, very few techniques focus on reconstructing the AC ligaments, despite its importance in providing stability. The purpose of our stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garg, Rishi, Adamson, Gregory J., Javidan, Pooya, Lee, Thay Q.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3858095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340150
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2013.5.4.298
_version_ 1782295231260000256
author Garg, Rishi
Adamson, Gregory J.
Javidan, Pooya
Lee, Thay Q.
author_facet Garg, Rishi
Adamson, Gregory J.
Javidan, Pooya
Lee, Thay Q.
author_sort Garg, Rishi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Several different surgical techniques have been described to address the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments in acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. However, very few techniques focus on reconstructing the AC ligaments, despite its importance in providing stability. The purpose of our study was to compare the biomechanical properties of two free-tissue graft techniques that reconstruct both the AC and CC ligaments in cadaveric shoulders, one with an extramedullary AC reconstruction and the other with an intramedullary AC reconstruction. We hypothesized intramedullary AC reconstruction will provide greater anteroposterior translational stability and improved load to failure characteristics than an extramedullary technique. METHODS: Six matched cadaveric shoulders underwent translational testing at 10 N and 15 N in the anteroposterior and superoinferior directions, under AC joint compression loads of 10 N, 20 N, and 30 N. After the AC and CC ligaments were transected, one of the specimens was randomly assigned the intramedullary free-tissue graft reconstruction while its matched pair received the extramedullary graft reconstruction. Both reconstructed specimens then underwent repeat translational testing, followed by load to failure testing, via superior clavicle distraction, at a rate of 50 mm/min. RESULTS: Intramedullary reconstruction provided significantly greater translational stability in the anteroposterior direction than the extramedullary technique for four of six loading conditions (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in translational stability in the superoinferior direction for any loading condition. The intramedullary reconstructed specimens demonstrated improved load to failure characteristics with the intramedullary reconstruction having a lower deformation at yield and a higher ultimate load than the extramedullary reconstruction (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary reconstruction of the AC joint provides greater stability in the anteroposterior direction and improved load to failure characteristics than an extramedullary technique. Reconstruction of the injured AC joint with an intramedullary free tissue graft may provide greater strength and stability than other currently used techniques, allowing patients to have improved clinical outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3858095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38580952013-12-11 Biomechanical Comparison of an Intramedullary and Extramedullary Free-Tissue Graft Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Joint Complex Garg, Rishi Adamson, Gregory J. Javidan, Pooya Lee, Thay Q. Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Several different surgical techniques have been described to address the coracoclavicular (CC) ligaments in acromioclavicular (AC) joint injuries. However, very few techniques focus on reconstructing the AC ligaments, despite its importance in providing stability. The purpose of our study was to compare the biomechanical properties of two free-tissue graft techniques that reconstruct both the AC and CC ligaments in cadaveric shoulders, one with an extramedullary AC reconstruction and the other with an intramedullary AC reconstruction. We hypothesized intramedullary AC reconstruction will provide greater anteroposterior translational stability and improved load to failure characteristics than an extramedullary technique. METHODS: Six matched cadaveric shoulders underwent translational testing at 10 N and 15 N in the anteroposterior and superoinferior directions, under AC joint compression loads of 10 N, 20 N, and 30 N. After the AC and CC ligaments were transected, one of the specimens was randomly assigned the intramedullary free-tissue graft reconstruction while its matched pair received the extramedullary graft reconstruction. Both reconstructed specimens then underwent repeat translational testing, followed by load to failure testing, via superior clavicle distraction, at a rate of 50 mm/min. RESULTS: Intramedullary reconstruction provided significantly greater translational stability in the anteroposterior direction than the extramedullary technique for four of six loading conditions (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in translational stability in the superoinferior direction for any loading condition. The intramedullary reconstructed specimens demonstrated improved load to failure characteristics with the intramedullary reconstruction having a lower deformation at yield and a higher ultimate load than the extramedullary reconstruction (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary reconstruction of the AC joint provides greater stability in the anteroposterior direction and improved load to failure characteristics than an extramedullary technique. Reconstruction of the injured AC joint with an intramedullary free tissue graft may provide greater strength and stability than other currently used techniques, allowing patients to have improved clinical outcomes. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2013-12 2013-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3858095/ /pubmed/24340150 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2013.5.4.298 Text en Copyright © 2013 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Garg, Rishi
Adamson, Gregory J.
Javidan, Pooya
Lee, Thay Q.
Biomechanical Comparison of an Intramedullary and Extramedullary Free-Tissue Graft Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Joint Complex
title Biomechanical Comparison of an Intramedullary and Extramedullary Free-Tissue Graft Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Joint Complex
title_full Biomechanical Comparison of an Intramedullary and Extramedullary Free-Tissue Graft Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Joint Complex
title_fullStr Biomechanical Comparison of an Intramedullary and Extramedullary Free-Tissue Graft Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Joint Complex
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Comparison of an Intramedullary and Extramedullary Free-Tissue Graft Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Joint Complex
title_short Biomechanical Comparison of an Intramedullary and Extramedullary Free-Tissue Graft Reconstruction of the Acromioclavicular Joint Complex
title_sort biomechanical comparison of an intramedullary and extramedullary free-tissue graft reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint complex
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3858095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340150
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2013.5.4.298
work_keys_str_mv AT gargrishi biomechanicalcomparisonofanintramedullaryandextramedullaryfreetissuegraftreconstructionoftheacromioclavicularjointcomplex
AT adamsongregoryj biomechanicalcomparisonofanintramedullaryandextramedullaryfreetissuegraftreconstructionoftheacromioclavicularjointcomplex
AT javidanpooya biomechanicalcomparisonofanintramedullaryandextramedullaryfreetissuegraftreconstructionoftheacromioclavicularjointcomplex
AT leethayq biomechanicalcomparisonofanintramedullaryandextramedullaryfreetissuegraftreconstructionoftheacromioclavicularjointcomplex