Cargando…

Reliability and Validity of Instruments for Assessing Perinatal Depression in African Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: A major barrier to improving perinatal mental health in Africa is the lack of locally validated tools for identifying probable cases of perinatal depression or for measuring changes in depression symptom severity. We systematically reviewed the evidence on the reliability and validity of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsai, Alexander C., Scott, Jennifer A., Hung, Kristin J., Zhu, Jennifer Q., Matthews, Lynn T., Psaros, Christina, Tomlinson, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3858316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082521
_version_ 1782295268220207104
author Tsai, Alexander C.
Scott, Jennifer A.
Hung, Kristin J.
Zhu, Jennifer Q.
Matthews, Lynn T.
Psaros, Christina
Tomlinson, Mark
author_facet Tsai, Alexander C.
Scott, Jennifer A.
Hung, Kristin J.
Zhu, Jennifer Q.
Matthews, Lynn T.
Psaros, Christina
Tomlinson, Mark
author_sort Tsai, Alexander C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A major barrier to improving perinatal mental health in Africa is the lack of locally validated tools for identifying probable cases of perinatal depression or for measuring changes in depression symptom severity. We systematically reviewed the evidence on the reliability and validity of instruments to assess perinatal depression in African settings. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Of 1,027 records identified through searching 7 electronic databases, we reviewed 126 full-text reports. We included 25 unique studies, which were disseminated in 26 journal articles and 1 doctoral dissertation. These enrolled 12,544 women living in nine different North and sub-Saharan African countries. Only three studies (12%) used instruments developed specifically for use in a given cultural setting. Most studies provided evidence of criterion-related validity (20 [80%]) or reliability (15 [60%]), while fewer studies provided evidence of construct validity, content validity, or internal structure. The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS), assessed in 16 studies (64%), was the most frequently used instrument in our sample. Ten studies estimated the internal consistency of the EPDS (median estimated coefficient alpha, 0.84; interquartile range, 0.71-0.87). For the 14 studies that estimated sensitivity and specificity for the EPDS, we constructed 2 x 2 tables for each cut-off score. Using a bivariate random-effects model, we estimated a pooled sensitivity of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.99) and a pooled specificity of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.59-0.88) at a cut-off score of ≥9, with higher cut-off scores yielding greater specificity at the cost of lower sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The EPDS can reliably and validly measure perinatal depression symptom severity or screen for probable postnatal depression in African countries, but more validation studies on other instruments are needed. In addition, more qualitative research is needed to adequately characterize local understandings of perinatal depression-like syndromes in different African contexts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3858316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38583162013-12-11 Reliability and Validity of Instruments for Assessing Perinatal Depression in African Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Tsai, Alexander C. Scott, Jennifer A. Hung, Kristin J. Zhu, Jennifer Q. Matthews, Lynn T. Psaros, Christina Tomlinson, Mark PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: A major barrier to improving perinatal mental health in Africa is the lack of locally validated tools for identifying probable cases of perinatal depression or for measuring changes in depression symptom severity. We systematically reviewed the evidence on the reliability and validity of instruments to assess perinatal depression in African settings. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Of 1,027 records identified through searching 7 electronic databases, we reviewed 126 full-text reports. We included 25 unique studies, which were disseminated in 26 journal articles and 1 doctoral dissertation. These enrolled 12,544 women living in nine different North and sub-Saharan African countries. Only three studies (12%) used instruments developed specifically for use in a given cultural setting. Most studies provided evidence of criterion-related validity (20 [80%]) or reliability (15 [60%]), while fewer studies provided evidence of construct validity, content validity, or internal structure. The Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS), assessed in 16 studies (64%), was the most frequently used instrument in our sample. Ten studies estimated the internal consistency of the EPDS (median estimated coefficient alpha, 0.84; interquartile range, 0.71-0.87). For the 14 studies that estimated sensitivity and specificity for the EPDS, we constructed 2 x 2 tables for each cut-off score. Using a bivariate random-effects model, we estimated a pooled sensitivity of 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.99) and a pooled specificity of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.59-0.88) at a cut-off score of ≥9, with higher cut-off scores yielding greater specificity at the cost of lower sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The EPDS can reliably and validly measure perinatal depression symptom severity or screen for probable postnatal depression in African countries, but more validation studies on other instruments are needed. In addition, more qualitative research is needed to adequately characterize local understandings of perinatal depression-like syndromes in different African contexts. Public Library of Science 2013-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3858316/ /pubmed/24340036 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082521 Text en © 2013 Tsai et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tsai, Alexander C.
Scott, Jennifer A.
Hung, Kristin J.
Zhu, Jennifer Q.
Matthews, Lynn T.
Psaros, Christina
Tomlinson, Mark
Reliability and Validity of Instruments for Assessing Perinatal Depression in African Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Reliability and Validity of Instruments for Assessing Perinatal Depression in African Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Reliability and Validity of Instruments for Assessing Perinatal Depression in African Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Reliability and Validity of Instruments for Assessing Perinatal Depression in African Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Validity of Instruments for Assessing Perinatal Depression in African Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Reliability and Validity of Instruments for Assessing Perinatal Depression in African Settings: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort reliability and validity of instruments for assessing perinatal depression in african settings: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3858316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340036
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082521
work_keys_str_mv AT tsaialexanderc reliabilityandvalidityofinstrumentsforassessingperinataldepressioninafricansettingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT scottjennifera reliabilityandvalidityofinstrumentsforassessingperinataldepressioninafricansettingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hungkristinj reliabilityandvalidityofinstrumentsforassessingperinataldepressioninafricansettingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhujenniferq reliabilityandvalidityofinstrumentsforassessingperinataldepressioninafricansettingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT matthewslynnt reliabilityandvalidityofinstrumentsforassessingperinataldepressioninafricansettingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT psaroschristina reliabilityandvalidityofinstrumentsforassessingperinataldepressioninafricansettingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT tomlinsonmark reliabilityandvalidityofinstrumentsforassessingperinataldepressioninafricansettingssystematicreviewandmetaanalysis