Cargando…

Rice Performance and Water Use Efficiency under Plastic Mulching with Drip Irrigation

Plastic mulching with drip irrigation is a new water-saving rice cultivation technology, but little is known on its productivity and water-saving capacity. This study aimed to assess the production potential, performance, and water use efficiency (WUE) of rice under plastic mulching with drip irriga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Haibing, Ma, Fuyu, Yang, Ru, Chen, Lin, Jia, Biao, Cui, Jing, Fan, Hua, Wang, Xin, Li, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3858349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083103
_version_ 1782295274223304704
author He, Haibing
Ma, Fuyu
Yang, Ru
Chen, Lin
Jia, Biao
Cui, Jing
Fan, Hua
Wang, Xin
Li, Li
author_facet He, Haibing
Ma, Fuyu
Yang, Ru
Chen, Lin
Jia, Biao
Cui, Jing
Fan, Hua
Wang, Xin
Li, Li
author_sort He, Haibing
collection PubMed
description Plastic mulching with drip irrigation is a new water-saving rice cultivation technology, but little is known on its productivity and water-saving capacity. This study aimed to assess the production potential, performance, and water use efficiency (WUE) of rice under plastic mulching with drip irrigation. Field experiments were conducted over 2 years with two rice cultivars under different cultivation systems: conventional flooding (CF), non-flooded irrigation incorporating plastic mulching with furrow irrigation (FIM), non-mulching with furrow irrigation (FIN), and plastic mulching with drip irrigation (DI). Compared with the CF treatment, grain yields were reduced by 31.76–52.19% under the DI treatment, by 57.16–61.02% under the FIM treatment, by 74.40–75.73% under the FIN treatment, which were mainly from source limitation, especially a low dry matter accumulation during post-anthesis, in non-flooded irrigation. WUE was the highest in the DI treatment, being 1.52–2.12 times higher than with the CF treatment, 1.35–1.89 times higher than with the FIM treatment, and 2.37–3.78 times higher than with the FIN treatment. The yield contribution from tillers (YCFTs) was 50.65–62.47% for the CF treatment and 12.07–20.62% for the non-flooded irrigation treatments. These low YCFTs values were attributed to the poor performance in tiller panicles rather than the total tiller number. Under non-flooded irrigation, root length was significantly reduced with more roots distributed in deep soil layers compared with the CF treatment; the DI treatment had more roots in the topsoil layer than the FIM and FIN treatments. The experiment demonstrates that the DI treatment has greater water saving capacity and lower yield and economic benefit gaps than the FIM and FIN treatments compared with the CF treatment, and would therefore be a better water-saving technology in areas of water scarcity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3858349
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38583492013-12-11 Rice Performance and Water Use Efficiency under Plastic Mulching with Drip Irrigation He, Haibing Ma, Fuyu Yang, Ru Chen, Lin Jia, Biao Cui, Jing Fan, Hua Wang, Xin Li, Li PLoS One Research Article Plastic mulching with drip irrigation is a new water-saving rice cultivation technology, but little is known on its productivity and water-saving capacity. This study aimed to assess the production potential, performance, and water use efficiency (WUE) of rice under plastic mulching with drip irrigation. Field experiments were conducted over 2 years with two rice cultivars under different cultivation systems: conventional flooding (CF), non-flooded irrigation incorporating plastic mulching with furrow irrigation (FIM), non-mulching with furrow irrigation (FIN), and plastic mulching with drip irrigation (DI). Compared with the CF treatment, grain yields were reduced by 31.76–52.19% under the DI treatment, by 57.16–61.02% under the FIM treatment, by 74.40–75.73% under the FIN treatment, which were mainly from source limitation, especially a low dry matter accumulation during post-anthesis, in non-flooded irrigation. WUE was the highest in the DI treatment, being 1.52–2.12 times higher than with the CF treatment, 1.35–1.89 times higher than with the FIM treatment, and 2.37–3.78 times higher than with the FIN treatment. The yield contribution from tillers (YCFTs) was 50.65–62.47% for the CF treatment and 12.07–20.62% for the non-flooded irrigation treatments. These low YCFTs values were attributed to the poor performance in tiller panicles rather than the total tiller number. Under non-flooded irrigation, root length was significantly reduced with more roots distributed in deep soil layers compared with the CF treatment; the DI treatment had more roots in the topsoil layer than the FIM and FIN treatments. The experiment demonstrates that the DI treatment has greater water saving capacity and lower yield and economic benefit gaps than the FIM and FIN treatments compared with the CF treatment, and would therefore be a better water-saving technology in areas of water scarcity. Public Library of Science 2013-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3858349/ /pubmed/24340087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083103 Text en © 2013 He et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
He, Haibing
Ma, Fuyu
Yang, Ru
Chen, Lin
Jia, Biao
Cui, Jing
Fan, Hua
Wang, Xin
Li, Li
Rice Performance and Water Use Efficiency under Plastic Mulching with Drip Irrigation
title Rice Performance and Water Use Efficiency under Plastic Mulching with Drip Irrigation
title_full Rice Performance and Water Use Efficiency under Plastic Mulching with Drip Irrigation
title_fullStr Rice Performance and Water Use Efficiency under Plastic Mulching with Drip Irrigation
title_full_unstemmed Rice Performance and Water Use Efficiency under Plastic Mulching with Drip Irrigation
title_short Rice Performance and Water Use Efficiency under Plastic Mulching with Drip Irrigation
title_sort rice performance and water use efficiency under plastic mulching with drip irrigation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3858349/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24340087
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083103
work_keys_str_mv AT hehaibing riceperformanceandwateruseefficiencyunderplasticmulchingwithdripirrigation
AT mafuyu riceperformanceandwateruseefficiencyunderplasticmulchingwithdripirrigation
AT yangru riceperformanceandwateruseefficiencyunderplasticmulchingwithdripirrigation
AT chenlin riceperformanceandwateruseefficiencyunderplasticmulchingwithdripirrigation
AT jiabiao riceperformanceandwateruseefficiencyunderplasticmulchingwithdripirrigation
AT cuijing riceperformanceandwateruseefficiencyunderplasticmulchingwithdripirrigation
AT fanhua riceperformanceandwateruseefficiencyunderplasticmulchingwithdripirrigation
AT wangxin riceperformanceandwateruseefficiencyunderplasticmulchingwithdripirrigation
AT lili riceperformanceandwateruseefficiencyunderplasticmulchingwithdripirrigation