Cargando…
Transoesophageal Doppler compared to central venous pressure for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and fluid guidance in liver resection
PURPOSE: Major hepatic resections may result in hemodynamic changes. Aim is to study transesophageal Doppler (TED) monitoring and fluid management in comparison to central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring. A follow-up comparative hospital based study. METHODS: 59 consecutive cirrhotic patients (CHIL...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3858686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24348287 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.121044 |
_version_ | 1782295306775298048 |
---|---|
author | El Sharkawy, Osama A. Refaat, Emad K. Ibraheem, Abdel Elmoniem M. Mahdy, Wafiya R. Fayed, Nirmeen A. Mourad, Wesam S. Abd Elhafez, Hanaa S. Yassen, Khaled A. |
author_facet | El Sharkawy, Osama A. Refaat, Emad K. Ibraheem, Abdel Elmoniem M. Mahdy, Wafiya R. Fayed, Nirmeen A. Mourad, Wesam S. Abd Elhafez, Hanaa S. Yassen, Khaled A. |
author_sort | El Sharkawy, Osama A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Major hepatic resections may result in hemodynamic changes. Aim is to study transesophageal Doppler (TED) monitoring and fluid management in comparison to central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring. A follow-up comparative hospital based study. METHODS: 59 consecutive cirrhotic patients (CHILD A) undergoing major hepatotomy. CVP monitoring only (CVP group), (n=30) and TED (Doppler group), (n=29) with CVP transduced but not available on the monitor. Exclusion criteria include contra-indication for Doppler probe insertion or bleeding tendency. An attempt to reduce CVP during the resection in both groups with colloid restriction, but crystalloids infusion of 6 ml/kg/h was allowed to replace insensible loss. Post-resection colloids infusion were CVP guided in CVP group (5-10 mmHg) and corrected flow time (FTc) aortic guided in Doppler group (>0.4 s) blood products given according to the laboratory data. RESULTS: Using the FTc to guide Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 significantly decreased intake in TED versus CVP (1.03 [0.49] versus 1.74 [0.41] Liter; P<0.05). Nausea, vomiting, and chest infection were less in TED with a shorter hospital stay (P<0.05). No correlation between FTc and CVP (r=0.24, P > 0.05). Cardiac index and stroke volume of TED increased post-resection compared to baseline, 3.0 (0.9) versus 3.6 (0.9) L/min/m(2), P<0.05; 67.1 (14.5) versus 76 (13.2) ml, P<0.05, respectively, associated with a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) 1142.7 (511) versus 835.4 (190.9) dynes.s/cm(5), P<0.05. No significant difference in arterial pressure and CVP between groups at any stage. CVP during resection in TED 6.4 (3.06) mmHg versus 6.1 (1.4) in CVP group, P=0.6. TED placement consumed less time than CVP (7.3 [1.5] min versus 13.2 [2.9], P<0.05). CONCLUSION: TED in comparison to the CVP monitoring was able to reduced colloids administration post-resection, lower morbidity and shorten hospital stay. TED consumed less time to insert and was also able to present significant hemodynamic changes. Advanced surgical techniques of resection play a key role in reducing blood loss despite CVP more than 5 cm H(2)O. TED fluid management protocols during resection need to be developed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3858686 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38586862013-12-16 Transoesophageal Doppler compared to central venous pressure for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and fluid guidance in liver resection El Sharkawy, Osama A. Refaat, Emad K. Ibraheem, Abdel Elmoniem M. Mahdy, Wafiya R. Fayed, Nirmeen A. Mourad, Wesam S. Abd Elhafez, Hanaa S. Yassen, Khaled A. Saudi J Anaesth Original Article PURPOSE: Major hepatic resections may result in hemodynamic changes. Aim is to study transesophageal Doppler (TED) monitoring and fluid management in comparison to central venous pressure (CVP) monitoring. A follow-up comparative hospital based study. METHODS: 59 consecutive cirrhotic patients (CHILD A) undergoing major hepatotomy. CVP monitoring only (CVP group), (n=30) and TED (Doppler group), (n=29) with CVP transduced but not available on the monitor. Exclusion criteria include contra-indication for Doppler probe insertion or bleeding tendency. An attempt to reduce CVP during the resection in both groups with colloid restriction, but crystalloids infusion of 6 ml/kg/h was allowed to replace insensible loss. Post-resection colloids infusion were CVP guided in CVP group (5-10 mmHg) and corrected flow time (FTc) aortic guided in Doppler group (>0.4 s) blood products given according to the laboratory data. RESULTS: Using the FTc to guide Hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 significantly decreased intake in TED versus CVP (1.03 [0.49] versus 1.74 [0.41] Liter; P<0.05). Nausea, vomiting, and chest infection were less in TED with a shorter hospital stay (P<0.05). No correlation between FTc and CVP (r=0.24, P > 0.05). Cardiac index and stroke volume of TED increased post-resection compared to baseline, 3.0 (0.9) versus 3.6 (0.9) L/min/m(2), P<0.05; 67.1 (14.5) versus 76 (13.2) ml, P<0.05, respectively, associated with a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (SVR) 1142.7 (511) versus 835.4 (190.9) dynes.s/cm(5), P<0.05. No significant difference in arterial pressure and CVP between groups at any stage. CVP during resection in TED 6.4 (3.06) mmHg versus 6.1 (1.4) in CVP group, P=0.6. TED placement consumed less time than CVP (7.3 [1.5] min versus 13.2 [2.9], P<0.05). CONCLUSION: TED in comparison to the CVP monitoring was able to reduced colloids administration post-resection, lower morbidity and shorten hospital stay. TED consumed less time to insert and was also able to present significant hemodynamic changes. Advanced surgical techniques of resection play a key role in reducing blood loss despite CVP more than 5 cm H(2)O. TED fluid management protocols during resection need to be developed. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3858686/ /pubmed/24348287 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.121044 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article El Sharkawy, Osama A. Refaat, Emad K. Ibraheem, Abdel Elmoniem M. Mahdy, Wafiya R. Fayed, Nirmeen A. Mourad, Wesam S. Abd Elhafez, Hanaa S. Yassen, Khaled A. Transoesophageal Doppler compared to central venous pressure for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and fluid guidance in liver resection |
title | Transoesophageal Doppler compared to central venous pressure for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and fluid guidance in liver resection |
title_full | Transoesophageal Doppler compared to central venous pressure for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and fluid guidance in liver resection |
title_fullStr | Transoesophageal Doppler compared to central venous pressure for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and fluid guidance in liver resection |
title_full_unstemmed | Transoesophageal Doppler compared to central venous pressure for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and fluid guidance in liver resection |
title_short | Transoesophageal Doppler compared to central venous pressure for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and fluid guidance in liver resection |
title_sort | transoesophageal doppler compared to central venous pressure for perioperative hemodynamic monitoring and fluid guidance in liver resection |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3858686/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24348287 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.121044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elsharkawyosamaa transoesophagealdopplercomparedtocentralvenouspressureforperioperativehemodynamicmonitoringandfluidguidanceinliverresection AT refaatemadk transoesophagealdopplercomparedtocentralvenouspressureforperioperativehemodynamicmonitoringandfluidguidanceinliverresection AT ibraheemabdelelmoniemm transoesophagealdopplercomparedtocentralvenouspressureforperioperativehemodynamicmonitoringandfluidguidanceinliverresection AT mahdywafiyar transoesophagealdopplercomparedtocentralvenouspressureforperioperativehemodynamicmonitoringandfluidguidanceinliverresection AT fayednirmeena transoesophagealdopplercomparedtocentralvenouspressureforperioperativehemodynamicmonitoringandfluidguidanceinliverresection AT mouradwesams transoesophagealdopplercomparedtocentralvenouspressureforperioperativehemodynamicmonitoringandfluidguidanceinliverresection AT abdelhafezhanaas transoesophagealdopplercomparedtocentralvenouspressureforperioperativehemodynamicmonitoringandfluidguidanceinliverresection AT yassenkhaleda transoesophagealdopplercomparedtocentralvenouspressureforperioperativehemodynamicmonitoringandfluidguidanceinliverresection |