Cargando…

Lateral ridge split and immediate implant placement in moderately resorbed alveolar ridges: How much is the added width?

BACKGROUND: Lateral ridge split technique is a way to solve the problem of the width in narrow ridges with adequate height. Simultaneous insertion of dental implants will considerably reduce the edentulism time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients who were managed with ridge splitting techni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahpeyma, Amin, Khajehahmadi, Saeedeh, Hosseini, Vahid Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3858733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24348616
_version_ 1782295316764033024
author Rahpeyma, Amin
Khajehahmadi, Saeedeh
Hosseini, Vahid Reza
author_facet Rahpeyma, Amin
Khajehahmadi, Saeedeh
Hosseini, Vahid Reza
author_sort Rahpeyma, Amin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Lateral ridge split technique is a way to solve the problem of the width in narrow ridges with adequate height. Simultaneous insertion of dental implants will considerably reduce the edentulism time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients who were managed with ridge splitting technique were enrolled. Thirty-eight locations in both jaws with near equal distribution in quadrants received 82 dental fixtures. Beta Tricalcium phosphate (Cerasorb(®) ) was used as biomaterial to fill the intercortical space. Submerged implants were used and 3 months later healing caps were placed. Direct bone measurements before and after split were done with a Collis. Patients were clinically re-evaluated at least 6 months after implant loading. All the data were analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 11.5 (SPSS Inc, Chicago Illinois, USA). Frequency of edentulous spaces and pre/post operative bone width was analyzed. Paired t-test was used for statistical analysis. Difference was considered significant if P value was less than 0.05. RESULTS: Mean value for presplit width was 3.2 ± 0.34 mm while post-split mean width was 5.57 ± 0.49 mm. Mean gain in crest ridge after ridge splitting was 2 ± 0.3 mm. Statistical analysis showed significant differences in width before and after operation ((P > 0.05). All implants (n = 82) survived and were in full function at follow up (at least 6 months after implant loading). CONCLUSION: Ridge splitting technique in both jaws showed the predictable outcomes, if appropriate cases selected and special attention paid to details; then the waiting time between surgery and beginning of prosthodontic treatment can be reduced to 3 month.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3858733
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38587332013-12-16 Lateral ridge split and immediate implant placement in moderately resorbed alveolar ridges: How much is the added width? Rahpeyma, Amin Khajehahmadi, Saeedeh Hosseini, Vahid Reza Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Lateral ridge split technique is a way to solve the problem of the width in narrow ridges with adequate height. Simultaneous insertion of dental implants will considerably reduce the edentulism time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients who were managed with ridge splitting technique were enrolled. Thirty-eight locations in both jaws with near equal distribution in quadrants received 82 dental fixtures. Beta Tricalcium phosphate (Cerasorb(®) ) was used as biomaterial to fill the intercortical space. Submerged implants were used and 3 months later healing caps were placed. Direct bone measurements before and after split were done with a Collis. Patients were clinically re-evaluated at least 6 months after implant loading. All the data were analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 11.5 (SPSS Inc, Chicago Illinois, USA). Frequency of edentulous spaces and pre/post operative bone width was analyzed. Paired t-test was used for statistical analysis. Difference was considered significant if P value was less than 0.05. RESULTS: Mean value for presplit width was 3.2 ± 0.34 mm while post-split mean width was 5.57 ± 0.49 mm. Mean gain in crest ridge after ridge splitting was 2 ± 0.3 mm. Statistical analysis showed significant differences in width before and after operation ((P > 0.05). All implants (n = 82) survived and were in full function at follow up (at least 6 months after implant loading). CONCLUSION: Ridge splitting technique in both jaws showed the predictable outcomes, if appropriate cases selected and special attention paid to details; then the waiting time between surgery and beginning of prosthodontic treatment can be reduced to 3 month. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3858733/ /pubmed/24348616 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rahpeyma, Amin
Khajehahmadi, Saeedeh
Hosseini, Vahid Reza
Lateral ridge split and immediate implant placement in moderately resorbed alveolar ridges: How much is the added width?
title Lateral ridge split and immediate implant placement in moderately resorbed alveolar ridges: How much is the added width?
title_full Lateral ridge split and immediate implant placement in moderately resorbed alveolar ridges: How much is the added width?
title_fullStr Lateral ridge split and immediate implant placement in moderately resorbed alveolar ridges: How much is the added width?
title_full_unstemmed Lateral ridge split and immediate implant placement in moderately resorbed alveolar ridges: How much is the added width?
title_short Lateral ridge split and immediate implant placement in moderately resorbed alveolar ridges: How much is the added width?
title_sort lateral ridge split and immediate implant placement in moderately resorbed alveolar ridges: how much is the added width?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3858733/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24348616
work_keys_str_mv AT rahpeymaamin lateralridgesplitandimmediateimplantplacementinmoderatelyresorbedalveolarridgeshowmuchistheaddedwidth
AT khajehahmadisaeedeh lateralridgesplitandimmediateimplantplacementinmoderatelyresorbedalveolarridgeshowmuchistheaddedwidth
AT hosseinivahidreza lateralridgesplitandimmediateimplantplacementinmoderatelyresorbedalveolarridgeshowmuchistheaddedwidth