Cargando…

Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery

Laser surgery provides a number of advantages over conventional surgery. However, it implies large risks for sensitive tissue structures due to its characteristic non-tissue-specific ablation. The present study investigates the discrimination of nine different ex vivo tissue types by using uncorrect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stelzle, Florian, Knipfer, Christian, Adler, Werner, Rohde, Maximilian, Oetter, Nicolai, Nkenke, Emeka, Schmidt, Michael, Tangermann-Gerk, Katja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3859088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24152930
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s131013717
_version_ 1782295378789400576
author Stelzle, Florian
Knipfer, Christian
Adler, Werner
Rohde, Maximilian
Oetter, Nicolai
Nkenke, Emeka
Schmidt, Michael
Tangermann-Gerk, Katja
author_facet Stelzle, Florian
Knipfer, Christian
Adler, Werner
Rohde, Maximilian
Oetter, Nicolai
Nkenke, Emeka
Schmidt, Michael
Tangermann-Gerk, Katja
author_sort Stelzle, Florian
collection PubMed
description Laser surgery provides a number of advantages over conventional surgery. However, it implies large risks for sensitive tissue structures due to its characteristic non-tissue-specific ablation. The present study investigates the discrimination of nine different ex vivo tissue types by using uncorrected (raw) autofluorescence spectra for the development of a remote feedback control system for tissue-selective laser surgery. Autofluorescence spectra (excitation wavelength 377 ± 50 nm) were measured from nine different ex vivo tissue types, obtained from 15 domestic pig cadavers. For data analysis, a wavelength range between 450 nm and 650 nm was investigated. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) were used to discriminate the tissue types. ROC analysis showed that PCA, followed by QDA, could differentiate all investigated tissue types with AUC results between 1.00 and 0.97. Sensitivity reached values between 93% and 100% and specificity values between 94% and 100%. This ex vivo study shows a high differentiation potential for physiological tissue types when performing autofluorescence spectroscopy followed by PCA and QDA. The uncorrected autofluorescence spectra are suitable for reliable tissue discrimination and have a high potential to meet the challenges necessary for an optical feedback system for tissue-specific laser surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3859088
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38590882013-12-11 Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery Stelzle, Florian Knipfer, Christian Adler, Werner Rohde, Maximilian Oetter, Nicolai Nkenke, Emeka Schmidt, Michael Tangermann-Gerk, Katja Sensors (Basel) Article Laser surgery provides a number of advantages over conventional surgery. However, it implies large risks for sensitive tissue structures due to its characteristic non-tissue-specific ablation. The present study investigates the discrimination of nine different ex vivo tissue types by using uncorrected (raw) autofluorescence spectra for the development of a remote feedback control system for tissue-selective laser surgery. Autofluorescence spectra (excitation wavelength 377 ± 50 nm) were measured from nine different ex vivo tissue types, obtained from 15 domestic pig cadavers. For data analysis, a wavelength range between 450 nm and 650 nm was investigated. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) were used to discriminate the tissue types. ROC analysis showed that PCA, followed by QDA, could differentiate all investigated tissue types with AUC results between 1.00 and 0.97. Sensitivity reached values between 93% and 100% and specificity values between 94% and 100%. This ex vivo study shows a high differentiation potential for physiological tissue types when performing autofluorescence spectroscopy followed by PCA and QDA. The uncorrected autofluorescence spectra are suitable for reliable tissue discrimination and have a high potential to meet the challenges necessary for an optical feedback system for tissue-specific laser surgery. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2013-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3859088/ /pubmed/24152930 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s131013717 Text en © 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Stelzle, Florian
Knipfer, Christian
Adler, Werner
Rohde, Maximilian
Oetter, Nicolai
Nkenke, Emeka
Schmidt, Michael
Tangermann-Gerk, Katja
Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery
title Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery
title_full Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery
title_fullStr Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery
title_short Tissue Discrimination by Uncorrected Autofluorescence Spectra: A Proof-of-Principle Study for Tissue-Specific Laser Surgery
title_sort tissue discrimination by uncorrected autofluorescence spectra: a proof-of-principle study for tissue-specific laser surgery
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3859088/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24152930
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s131013717
work_keys_str_mv AT stelzleflorian tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery
AT knipferchristian tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery
AT adlerwerner tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery
AT rohdemaximilian tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery
AT oetternicolai tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery
AT nkenkeemeka tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery
AT schmidtmichael tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery
AT tangermanngerkkatja tissuediscriminationbyuncorrectedautofluorescencespectraaproofofprinciplestudyfortissuespecificlasersurgery