Cargando…

The roles of physical and physiological simultaneity in audiovisual multisensory facilitation

A series of experiments measured the audiovisual stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA(AV)), yielding facilitative multisensory integration. We evaluated (1) the range of SOA(AV) over which facilitation occurred when unisensory stimuli were weak; (2) whether the range of SOA(AV) producing facilitation supp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leone, Lynnette M., McCourt, Mark E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Pion 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3859565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0532
_version_ 1782295429380046848
author Leone, Lynnette M.
McCourt, Mark E.
author_facet Leone, Lynnette M.
McCourt, Mark E.
author_sort Leone, Lynnette M.
collection PubMed
description A series of experiments measured the audiovisual stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA(AV)), yielding facilitative multisensory integration. We evaluated (1) the range of SOA(AV) over which facilitation occurred when unisensory stimuli were weak; (2) whether the range of SOA(AV) producing facilitation supported the hypothesis that physiological simultaneity of unisensory activity governs multisensory facilitation; and (3) whether AV multisensory facilitation depended on relative stimulus intensity. We compared response-time distributions to unisensory auditory (A) and visual (V) stimuli with those to AV stimuli over a wide range (300 and 20 ms increments) of SOA(AV), across four conditions of varying stimulus intensity. In condition 1, the intensity of unisensory stimuli was adjusted such that d′ ≈ 2. In condition 2, V stimulus intensity was increased (d′ > 4), while A stimulus intensity was as in condition 1. In condition 3, A stimulus intensity was increased (d′ > 4) while V stimulus intensity was as in condition 1. In condition 4, both A and V stimulus intensities were increased to clearly suprathreshold levels (d′ > 4). Across all conditions of stimulus intensity, significant multisensory facilitation occurred exclusively for simultaneously presented A and V stimuli. In addition, facilitation increased as stimulus intensity increased, in disagreement with inverse effectiveness. These results indicate that the requirements for facilitative multisensory integration include both physical and physiological simultaneity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3859565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Pion
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38595652013-12-16 The roles of physical and physiological simultaneity in audiovisual multisensory facilitation Leone, Lynnette M. McCourt, Mark E. Iperception Article A series of experiments measured the audiovisual stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA(AV)), yielding facilitative multisensory integration. We evaluated (1) the range of SOA(AV) over which facilitation occurred when unisensory stimuli were weak; (2) whether the range of SOA(AV) producing facilitation supported the hypothesis that physiological simultaneity of unisensory activity governs multisensory facilitation; and (3) whether AV multisensory facilitation depended on relative stimulus intensity. We compared response-time distributions to unisensory auditory (A) and visual (V) stimuli with those to AV stimuli over a wide range (300 and 20 ms increments) of SOA(AV), across four conditions of varying stimulus intensity. In condition 1, the intensity of unisensory stimuli was adjusted such that d′ ≈ 2. In condition 2, V stimulus intensity was increased (d′ > 4), while A stimulus intensity was as in condition 1. In condition 3, A stimulus intensity was increased (d′ > 4) while V stimulus intensity was as in condition 1. In condition 4, both A and V stimulus intensities were increased to clearly suprathreshold levels (d′ > 4). Across all conditions of stimulus intensity, significant multisensory facilitation occurred exclusively for simultaneously presented A and V stimuli. In addition, facilitation increased as stimulus intensity increased, in disagreement with inverse effectiveness. These results indicate that the requirements for facilitative multisensory integration include both physical and physiological simultaneity. Pion 2013-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3859565/ /pubmed/24349682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0532 Text en Copyright 2013 L M Leone, M E McCourt http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Licence, which permits noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction, provided the original author(s) and source are credited and no alterations are made.
spellingShingle Article
Leone, Lynnette M.
McCourt, Mark E.
The roles of physical and physiological simultaneity in audiovisual multisensory facilitation
title The roles of physical and physiological simultaneity in audiovisual multisensory facilitation
title_full The roles of physical and physiological simultaneity in audiovisual multisensory facilitation
title_fullStr The roles of physical and physiological simultaneity in audiovisual multisensory facilitation
title_full_unstemmed The roles of physical and physiological simultaneity in audiovisual multisensory facilitation
title_short The roles of physical and physiological simultaneity in audiovisual multisensory facilitation
title_sort roles of physical and physiological simultaneity in audiovisual multisensory facilitation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3859565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349682
http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/i0532
work_keys_str_mv AT leonelynnettem therolesofphysicalandphysiologicalsimultaneityinaudiovisualmultisensoryfacilitation
AT mccourtmarke therolesofphysicalandphysiologicalsimultaneityinaudiovisualmultisensoryfacilitation
AT leonelynnettem rolesofphysicalandphysiologicalsimultaneityinaudiovisualmultisensoryfacilitation
AT mccourtmarke rolesofphysicalandphysiologicalsimultaneityinaudiovisualmultisensoryfacilitation