Cargando…

Do weight loss and adherence cluster within behavioral treatment groups?

OBJECTIVE: Weight loss programs are often conducted in a group format, but it is unclear whether weight losses or adherence cluster within treatment group and whether characteristics of the group (e.g. size or homogeneity) affect outcomes. We examined these questions within Look AHEAD, a multicenter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wing, Rena R., Leahey, Tricia, Jeffery, Robert, Johnson, Karen C., Hill, James O., Coday, Mace, Espeland, Mark A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3859866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23804576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20526
_version_ 1782295463232274432
author Wing, Rena R.
Leahey, Tricia
Jeffery, Robert
Johnson, Karen C.
Hill, James O.
Coday, Mace
Espeland, Mark A.
author_facet Wing, Rena R.
Leahey, Tricia
Jeffery, Robert
Johnson, Karen C.
Hill, James O.
Coday, Mace
Espeland, Mark A.
author_sort Wing, Rena R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Weight loss programs are often conducted in a group format, but it is unclear whether weight losses or adherence cluster within treatment group and whether characteristics of the group (e.g. size or homogeneity) affect outcomes. We examined these questions within Look AHEAD, a multicenter study of the effects of an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) in overweight/obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Weight losses and adherence (attendance, use of meal replacement products, and minutes of activity) were examined over one year of intervention in 2329 ILI participants in 209 treatment groups, which all received the same weight loss program. RESULTS: Weight losses did not cluster among members of a treatment group (intra-class correlation [ICC] of .007), whereas measures of adherence had small/moderate clustering (ICCs of .05–.11). The 209 groups varied in weight losses, with a mean of 8.64 % (SD=2.35 %, interquartile range=6.82%, 10.32%), but neither size nor baseline homogeneity of members affected the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Although these findings suggest that it may not be necessary to control for clustering in behavioral weight loss studies, they also indicate that merely treating individuals in groups is not sufficient to harness social influences on weight loss.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3859866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38598662014-09-01 Do weight loss and adherence cluster within behavioral treatment groups? Wing, Rena R. Leahey, Tricia Jeffery, Robert Johnson, Karen C. Hill, James O. Coday, Mace Espeland, Mark A. Obesity (Silver Spring) Article OBJECTIVE: Weight loss programs are often conducted in a group format, but it is unclear whether weight losses or adherence cluster within treatment group and whether characteristics of the group (e.g. size or homogeneity) affect outcomes. We examined these questions within Look AHEAD, a multicenter study of the effects of an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) in overweight/obese individuals with type 2 diabetes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Weight losses and adherence (attendance, use of meal replacement products, and minutes of activity) were examined over one year of intervention in 2329 ILI participants in 209 treatment groups, which all received the same weight loss program. RESULTS: Weight losses did not cluster among members of a treatment group (intra-class correlation [ICC] of .007), whereas measures of adherence had small/moderate clustering (ICCs of .05–.11). The 209 groups varied in weight losses, with a mean of 8.64 % (SD=2.35 %, interquartile range=6.82%, 10.32%), but neither size nor baseline homogeneity of members affected the outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Although these findings suggest that it may not be necessary to control for clustering in behavioral weight loss studies, they also indicate that merely treating individuals in groups is not sufficient to harness social influences on weight loss. 2013-12-02 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3859866/ /pubmed/23804576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20526 Text en http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Wing, Rena R.
Leahey, Tricia
Jeffery, Robert
Johnson, Karen C.
Hill, James O.
Coday, Mace
Espeland, Mark A.
Do weight loss and adherence cluster within behavioral treatment groups?
title Do weight loss and adherence cluster within behavioral treatment groups?
title_full Do weight loss and adherence cluster within behavioral treatment groups?
title_fullStr Do weight loss and adherence cluster within behavioral treatment groups?
title_full_unstemmed Do weight loss and adherence cluster within behavioral treatment groups?
title_short Do weight loss and adherence cluster within behavioral treatment groups?
title_sort do weight loss and adherence cluster within behavioral treatment groups?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3859866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23804576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/oby.20526
work_keys_str_mv AT wingrenar doweightlossandadherenceclusterwithinbehavioraltreatmentgroups
AT leaheytricia doweightlossandadherenceclusterwithinbehavioraltreatmentgroups
AT jefferyrobert doweightlossandadherenceclusterwithinbehavioraltreatmentgroups
AT johnsonkarenc doweightlossandadherenceclusterwithinbehavioraltreatmentgroups
AT hilljameso doweightlossandadherenceclusterwithinbehavioraltreatmentgroups
AT codaymace doweightlossandadherenceclusterwithinbehavioraltreatmentgroups
AT espelandmarka doweightlossandadherenceclusterwithinbehavioraltreatmentgroups
AT doweightlossandadherenceclusterwithinbehavioraltreatmentgroups