Cargando…

Why do adults with dyslexia have poor global motion sensitivity?

Two experiments aimed to determine why adults with dyslexia have higher global motion thresholds than typically reading controls. In Experiment 1, the dot density and number of animation frames presented in the dot stimulus were manipulated because of findings that use of a high dot density can norm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Conlon, Elizabeth G., Lilleskaret, Gry, Wright, Craig M., Stuksrud, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3860316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24376414
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00859
_version_ 1782295521612791808
author Conlon, Elizabeth G.
Lilleskaret, Gry
Wright, Craig M.
Stuksrud, Anne
author_facet Conlon, Elizabeth G.
Lilleskaret, Gry
Wright, Craig M.
Stuksrud, Anne
author_sort Conlon, Elizabeth G.
collection PubMed
description Two experiments aimed to determine why adults with dyslexia have higher global motion thresholds than typically reading controls. In Experiment 1, the dot density and number of animation frames presented in the dot stimulus were manipulated because of findings that use of a high dot density can normalize coherence thresholds in individuals with dyslexia. Dot densities were 14.15 and 3.54 dots/deg(2). These were presented for five (84 ms) or eight (134 ms) frames. The dyslexia group had higher coherence thresholds in all conditions than controls. However, in the high dot density, long duration condition, both reader groups had the lowest thresholds indicating normal temporal recruitment. These results indicated that the dyslexia group could sample the additional signals dots over space and then integrate these with the same efficiency as controls. In Experiment 2, we determined whether briefly presenting a fully coherent prime moving in either the same or opposite direction of motion to a partially coherent test stimulus would systematically increase and decrease global motion thresholds in the reader groups. When the direction of motion in the prime and test was the same, global motion thresholds increased for both reader groups. The increase in coherence thresholds was significantly greater for the dyslexia group. When the motion of the prime and test were presented in opposite directions, coherence thresholds were reduced in both groups. No group threshold differences were found. We concluded that the global motion processing deficit found in adults with dyslexia can be explained by undersampling of the target motion signals. This might occur because of difficulties directing attention to the relevant motion signals in the random dot pattern, and not a specific difficulty integrating global motion signals. These effects are most likely to occur in the group with dyslexia when more complex computational processes are required to process global motion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3860316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38603162013-12-27 Why do adults with dyslexia have poor global motion sensitivity? Conlon, Elizabeth G. Lilleskaret, Gry Wright, Craig M. Stuksrud, Anne Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Two experiments aimed to determine why adults with dyslexia have higher global motion thresholds than typically reading controls. In Experiment 1, the dot density and number of animation frames presented in the dot stimulus were manipulated because of findings that use of a high dot density can normalize coherence thresholds in individuals with dyslexia. Dot densities were 14.15 and 3.54 dots/deg(2). These were presented for five (84 ms) or eight (134 ms) frames. The dyslexia group had higher coherence thresholds in all conditions than controls. However, in the high dot density, long duration condition, both reader groups had the lowest thresholds indicating normal temporal recruitment. These results indicated that the dyslexia group could sample the additional signals dots over space and then integrate these with the same efficiency as controls. In Experiment 2, we determined whether briefly presenting a fully coherent prime moving in either the same or opposite direction of motion to a partially coherent test stimulus would systematically increase and decrease global motion thresholds in the reader groups. When the direction of motion in the prime and test was the same, global motion thresholds increased for both reader groups. The increase in coherence thresholds was significantly greater for the dyslexia group. When the motion of the prime and test were presented in opposite directions, coherence thresholds were reduced in both groups. No group threshold differences were found. We concluded that the global motion processing deficit found in adults with dyslexia can be explained by undersampling of the target motion signals. This might occur because of difficulties directing attention to the relevant motion signals in the random dot pattern, and not a specific difficulty integrating global motion signals. These effects are most likely to occur in the group with dyslexia when more complex computational processes are required to process global motion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3860316/ /pubmed/24376414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00859 Text en Copyright © 2013 Conlon, Lilleskaret, Wright and Stuksrud. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Conlon, Elizabeth G.
Lilleskaret, Gry
Wright, Craig M.
Stuksrud, Anne
Why do adults with dyslexia have poor global motion sensitivity?
title Why do adults with dyslexia have poor global motion sensitivity?
title_full Why do adults with dyslexia have poor global motion sensitivity?
title_fullStr Why do adults with dyslexia have poor global motion sensitivity?
title_full_unstemmed Why do adults with dyslexia have poor global motion sensitivity?
title_short Why do adults with dyslexia have poor global motion sensitivity?
title_sort why do adults with dyslexia have poor global motion sensitivity?
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3860316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24376414
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00859
work_keys_str_mv AT conlonelizabethg whydoadultswithdyslexiahavepoorglobalmotionsensitivity
AT lilleskaretgry whydoadultswithdyslexiahavepoorglobalmotionsensitivity
AT wrightcraigm whydoadultswithdyslexiahavepoorglobalmotionsensitivity
AT stuksrudanne whydoadultswithdyslexiahavepoorglobalmotionsensitivity