Cargando…

A comparison and optimization of methods and factors affecting the transformation of Escherichia coli

DNA manipulation routinely requires competent bacteria that can be made using one of numerous methods. To determine the best methods, we compared four commonly used chemical methods (DMSO, MgCl(2)–CaCl(2), CaCl(2) and Hanahan's methods) on frequently used Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains: DH5...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chan, Weng-Tat, Verma, Chandra S., Lane, David P., Gan, Samuel Ken-En
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Portland Press Ltd. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3860579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24229075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20130098
_version_ 1782295564225871872
author Chan, Weng-Tat
Verma, Chandra S.
Lane, David P.
Gan, Samuel Ken-En
author_facet Chan, Weng-Tat
Verma, Chandra S.
Lane, David P.
Gan, Samuel Ken-En
author_sort Chan, Weng-Tat
collection PubMed
description DNA manipulation routinely requires competent bacteria that can be made using one of numerous methods. To determine the best methods, we compared four commonly used chemical methods (DMSO, MgCl(2)–CaCl(2), CaCl(2) and Hanahan's methods) on frequently used Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains: DH5α, XL-1 Blue, SCS110, JM109, TOP10 and BL21-(DE3)-PLysS. Hanahan's method was found to be most effective for DH5α, XL-1 Blue and JM109 strains (P<0.05), whilst the CaCl(2) method was best for SCS110, TOP10 and BL21 strains (P<0.05). The use of SOB (super optimal broth) over LB [Luria–Bertani (broth)] growth media was found to enhance the competency of XL-1 Blue (P<0.05), dampened JM109′s competency (P<0.05), and had no effect on the other strains (P>0.05). We found no significant differences between using 45 or 90 s heat shock across all the six strains (P>0.05). Through further optimization by means of concentrating the aliquots, we were able to get further increases in transformation efficiencies. Based on the optimized parameters and methods, these common laboratory E. coli strains attained high levels of TrE (transformation efficiency), thus facilitating the production of highly efficient and cost-effective competent bacteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3860579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Portland Press Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38605792013-12-18 A comparison and optimization of methods and factors affecting the transformation of Escherichia coli Chan, Weng-Tat Verma, Chandra S. Lane, David P. Gan, Samuel Ken-En Biosci Rep Original Paper DNA manipulation routinely requires competent bacteria that can be made using one of numerous methods. To determine the best methods, we compared four commonly used chemical methods (DMSO, MgCl(2)–CaCl(2), CaCl(2) and Hanahan's methods) on frequently used Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains: DH5α, XL-1 Blue, SCS110, JM109, TOP10 and BL21-(DE3)-PLysS. Hanahan's method was found to be most effective for DH5α, XL-1 Blue and JM109 strains (P<0.05), whilst the CaCl(2) method was best for SCS110, TOP10 and BL21 strains (P<0.05). The use of SOB (super optimal broth) over LB [Luria–Bertani (broth)] growth media was found to enhance the competency of XL-1 Blue (P<0.05), dampened JM109′s competency (P<0.05), and had no effect on the other strains (P>0.05). We found no significant differences between using 45 or 90 s heat shock across all the six strains (P>0.05). Through further optimization by means of concentrating the aliquots, we were able to get further increases in transformation efficiencies. Based on the optimized parameters and methods, these common laboratory E. coli strains attained high levels of TrE (transformation efficiency), thus facilitating the production of highly efficient and cost-effective competent bacteria. Portland Press Ltd. 2013-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3860579/ /pubmed/24229075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20130098 Text en © 2013 The author(s) has paid for this article to be freely available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY)(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Chan, Weng-Tat
Verma, Chandra S.
Lane, David P.
Gan, Samuel Ken-En
A comparison and optimization of methods and factors affecting the transformation of Escherichia coli
title A comparison and optimization of methods and factors affecting the transformation of Escherichia coli
title_full A comparison and optimization of methods and factors affecting the transformation of Escherichia coli
title_fullStr A comparison and optimization of methods and factors affecting the transformation of Escherichia coli
title_full_unstemmed A comparison and optimization of methods and factors affecting the transformation of Escherichia coli
title_short A comparison and optimization of methods and factors affecting the transformation of Escherichia coli
title_sort comparison and optimization of methods and factors affecting the transformation of escherichia coli
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3860579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24229075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/BSR20130098
work_keys_str_mv AT chanwengtat acomparisonandoptimizationofmethodsandfactorsaffectingthetransformationofescherichiacoli
AT vermachandras acomparisonandoptimizationofmethodsandfactorsaffectingthetransformationofescherichiacoli
AT lanedavidp acomparisonandoptimizationofmethodsandfactorsaffectingthetransformationofescherichiacoli
AT gansamuelkenen acomparisonandoptimizationofmethodsandfactorsaffectingthetransformationofescherichiacoli
AT chanwengtat comparisonandoptimizationofmethodsandfactorsaffectingthetransformationofescherichiacoli
AT vermachandras comparisonandoptimizationofmethodsandfactorsaffectingthetransformationofescherichiacoli
AT lanedavidp comparisonandoptimizationofmethodsandfactorsaffectingthetransformationofescherichiacoli
AT gansamuelkenen comparisonandoptimizationofmethodsandfactorsaffectingthetransformationofescherichiacoli