Cargando…

Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates

BACKGROUND: Monocortical miniplate fixation is an accepted and reliable method for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Although placement of a second miniplate may theoretically provide more stability; however, the clinical importance of this issue remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yazdani, Javad, Taheri Talesh, Kourosh, Kalantar Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein, Khorshidi, Reza, Fekri, Sasan, Hajmohammadi, Saeed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Kowsar 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3860651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24350144
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.9865
_version_ 1782295572479213568
author Yazdani, Javad
Taheri Talesh, Kourosh
Kalantar Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein
Khorshidi, Reza
Fekri, Sasan
Hajmohammadi, Saeed
author_facet Yazdani, Javad
Taheri Talesh, Kourosh
Kalantar Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein
Khorshidi, Reza
Fekri, Sasan
Hajmohammadi, Saeed
author_sort Yazdani, Javad
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Monocortical miniplate fixation is an accepted and reliable method for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Although placement of a second miniplate may theoretically provide more stability; however, the clinical importance of this issue remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: The present study assessed the postoperative complications and outcomes associated with the fixation of mandibular angle fractures using 1 and 2 miniplates in patients with favorable mandibular angle fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 87 patients (73 males, 14 females) with favorable mandibular angle fractures was done. In the first group, a 4-hole miniplate was placed at the superior border through an intraoral approach. In group 2, patients were treated with 2 miniplates, one placed at the superior border (similar to group 1) and the other on the lateral aspect of the angle at the inferior border through an intraoral and transcutaneous approach using a trocar. Postoperative complications including malocclusion, malunion and sensory disturbances associated with surgery, additional maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) by means of an arch bar and wires for a longer period (for delayed union) and infection were assessed in patients of both groups up to 12 months postoperatively. The data were analyzed using the chi-square test. RESULTS: In the single miniplate group, 25 patients showed lip numbness associated with surgery (55.6%), 22 patients required additional use of MMF (48.9%) and 3 patients developed infections (6.7%). In the double miniplate group 20 patients showed lip numbness associated with surgery (47.6%), 18 patients required additional use of MMF (42.9%) and 1 patient developed infection (2.4%). None of the patients in either group showed malocclusion or malunion. No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding overall complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, use of one miniplate or two miniplates for treatment of favorable mandibular angle fractures was associated with a similar incidence of complications. Thus, it seems that the use of two miniplates in this setting may not be warranted, nor cost-efficient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3860651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Kowsar
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38606512013-12-16 Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates Yazdani, Javad Taheri Talesh, Kourosh Kalantar Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein Khorshidi, Reza Fekri, Sasan Hajmohammadi, Saeed Trauma Mon Research Article BACKGROUND: Monocortical miniplate fixation is an accepted and reliable method for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Although placement of a second miniplate may theoretically provide more stability; however, the clinical importance of this issue remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: The present study assessed the postoperative complications and outcomes associated with the fixation of mandibular angle fractures using 1 and 2 miniplates in patients with favorable mandibular angle fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 87 patients (73 males, 14 females) with favorable mandibular angle fractures was done. In the first group, a 4-hole miniplate was placed at the superior border through an intraoral approach. In group 2, patients were treated with 2 miniplates, one placed at the superior border (similar to group 1) and the other on the lateral aspect of the angle at the inferior border through an intraoral and transcutaneous approach using a trocar. Postoperative complications including malocclusion, malunion and sensory disturbances associated with surgery, additional maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) by means of an arch bar and wires for a longer period (for delayed union) and infection were assessed in patients of both groups up to 12 months postoperatively. The data were analyzed using the chi-square test. RESULTS: In the single miniplate group, 25 patients showed lip numbness associated with surgery (55.6%), 22 patients required additional use of MMF (48.9%) and 3 patients developed infections (6.7%). In the double miniplate group 20 patients showed lip numbness associated with surgery (47.6%), 18 patients required additional use of MMF (42.9%) and 1 patient developed infection (2.4%). None of the patients in either group showed malocclusion or malunion. No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding overall complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, use of one miniplate or two miniplates for treatment of favorable mandibular angle fractures was associated with a similar incidence of complications. Thus, it seems that the use of two miniplates in this setting may not be warranted, nor cost-efficient. Kowsar 2013-05-26 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3860651/ /pubmed/24350144 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.9865 Text en Copyright © 2013, Trauma Research Center http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yazdani, Javad
Taheri Talesh, Kourosh
Kalantar Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein
Khorshidi, Reza
Fekri, Sasan
Hajmohammadi, Saeed
Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates
title Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates
title_full Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates
title_fullStr Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates
title_full_unstemmed Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates
title_short Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates
title_sort mandibular angle fractures: comparison of one miniplate vs. two miniplates
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3860651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24350144
http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.9865
work_keys_str_mv AT yazdanijavad mandibularanglefracturescomparisonofoneminiplatevstwominiplates
AT taheritaleshkourosh mandibularanglefracturescomparisonofoneminiplatevstwominiplates
AT kalantarmotamedimohammadhosein mandibularanglefracturescomparisonofoneminiplatevstwominiplates
AT khorshidireza mandibularanglefracturescomparisonofoneminiplatevstwominiplates
AT fekrisasan mandibularanglefracturescomparisonofoneminiplatevstwominiplates
AT hajmohammadisaeed mandibularanglefracturescomparisonofoneminiplatevstwominiplates