Cargando…
Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates
BACKGROUND: Monocortical miniplate fixation is an accepted and reliable method for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Although placement of a second miniplate may theoretically provide more stability; however, the clinical importance of this issue remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: The...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Kowsar
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3860651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24350144 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.9865 |
_version_ | 1782295572479213568 |
---|---|
author | Yazdani, Javad Taheri Talesh, Kourosh Kalantar Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein Khorshidi, Reza Fekri, Sasan Hajmohammadi, Saeed |
author_facet | Yazdani, Javad Taheri Talesh, Kourosh Kalantar Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein Khorshidi, Reza Fekri, Sasan Hajmohammadi, Saeed |
author_sort | Yazdani, Javad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Monocortical miniplate fixation is an accepted and reliable method for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Although placement of a second miniplate may theoretically provide more stability; however, the clinical importance of this issue remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: The present study assessed the postoperative complications and outcomes associated with the fixation of mandibular angle fractures using 1 and 2 miniplates in patients with favorable mandibular angle fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 87 patients (73 males, 14 females) with favorable mandibular angle fractures was done. In the first group, a 4-hole miniplate was placed at the superior border through an intraoral approach. In group 2, patients were treated with 2 miniplates, one placed at the superior border (similar to group 1) and the other on the lateral aspect of the angle at the inferior border through an intraoral and transcutaneous approach using a trocar. Postoperative complications including malocclusion, malunion and sensory disturbances associated with surgery, additional maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) by means of an arch bar and wires for a longer period (for delayed union) and infection were assessed in patients of both groups up to 12 months postoperatively. The data were analyzed using the chi-square test. RESULTS: In the single miniplate group, 25 patients showed lip numbness associated with surgery (55.6%), 22 patients required additional use of MMF (48.9%) and 3 patients developed infections (6.7%). In the double miniplate group 20 patients showed lip numbness associated with surgery (47.6%), 18 patients required additional use of MMF (42.9%) and 1 patient developed infection (2.4%). None of the patients in either group showed malocclusion or malunion. No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding overall complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, use of one miniplate or two miniplates for treatment of favorable mandibular angle fractures was associated with a similar incidence of complications. Thus, it seems that the use of two miniplates in this setting may not be warranted, nor cost-efficient. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3860651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Kowsar |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38606512013-12-16 Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates Yazdani, Javad Taheri Talesh, Kourosh Kalantar Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein Khorshidi, Reza Fekri, Sasan Hajmohammadi, Saeed Trauma Mon Research Article BACKGROUND: Monocortical miniplate fixation is an accepted and reliable method for internal fixation of mandibular angle fractures. Although placement of a second miniplate may theoretically provide more stability; however, the clinical importance of this issue remains controversial. OBJECTIVES: The present study assessed the postoperative complications and outcomes associated with the fixation of mandibular angle fractures using 1 and 2 miniplates in patients with favorable mandibular angle fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective study of 87 patients (73 males, 14 females) with favorable mandibular angle fractures was done. In the first group, a 4-hole miniplate was placed at the superior border through an intraoral approach. In group 2, patients were treated with 2 miniplates, one placed at the superior border (similar to group 1) and the other on the lateral aspect of the angle at the inferior border through an intraoral and transcutaneous approach using a trocar. Postoperative complications including malocclusion, malunion and sensory disturbances associated with surgery, additional maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) by means of an arch bar and wires for a longer period (for delayed union) and infection were assessed in patients of both groups up to 12 months postoperatively. The data were analyzed using the chi-square test. RESULTS: In the single miniplate group, 25 patients showed lip numbness associated with surgery (55.6%), 22 patients required additional use of MMF (48.9%) and 3 patients developed infections (6.7%). In the double miniplate group 20 patients showed lip numbness associated with surgery (47.6%), 18 patients required additional use of MMF (42.9%) and 1 patient developed infection (2.4%). None of the patients in either group showed malocclusion or malunion. No significant difference was observed between the groups regarding overall complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, use of one miniplate or two miniplates for treatment of favorable mandibular angle fractures was associated with a similar incidence of complications. Thus, it seems that the use of two miniplates in this setting may not be warranted, nor cost-efficient. Kowsar 2013-05-26 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3860651/ /pubmed/24350144 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.9865 Text en Copyright © 2013, Trauma Research Center http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yazdani, Javad Taheri Talesh, Kourosh Kalantar Motamedi, Mohammad Hosein Khorshidi, Reza Fekri, Sasan Hajmohammadi, Saeed Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates |
title | Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates |
title_full | Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates |
title_fullStr | Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates |
title_full_unstemmed | Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates |
title_short | Mandibular Angle Fractures: Comparison of One Miniplate vs. Two Miniplates |
title_sort | mandibular angle fractures: comparison of one miniplate vs. two miniplates |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3860651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24350144 http://dx.doi.org/10.5812/traumamon.9865 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yazdanijavad mandibularanglefracturescomparisonofoneminiplatevstwominiplates AT taheritaleshkourosh mandibularanglefracturescomparisonofoneminiplatevstwominiplates AT kalantarmotamedimohammadhosein mandibularanglefracturescomparisonofoneminiplatevstwominiplates AT khorshidireza mandibularanglefracturescomparisonofoneminiplatevstwominiplates AT fekrisasan mandibularanglefracturescomparisonofoneminiplatevstwominiplates AT hajmohammadisaeed mandibularanglefracturescomparisonofoneminiplatevstwominiplates |