Cargando…

Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene

In Drosophila melanogaster, natural genetic variation in the foraging gene affects the foraging behaviour of larval and adult flies, larval reward learning, adult visual learning, and adult aversive training tasks. Sitters (for (s)) are more sedentary and aggregate within food patches whereas rovers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kohn, Nancy R., Reaume, Christopher J., Moreno, Celine, Burns, James G., Sokolowski, Marla B., Mery, Frederic
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3861308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081272
_version_ 1782295612442542080
author Kohn, Nancy R.
Reaume, Christopher J.
Moreno, Celine
Burns, James G.
Sokolowski, Marla B.
Mery, Frederic
author_facet Kohn, Nancy R.
Reaume, Christopher J.
Moreno, Celine
Burns, James G.
Sokolowski, Marla B.
Mery, Frederic
author_sort Kohn, Nancy R.
collection PubMed
description In Drosophila melanogaster, natural genetic variation in the foraging gene affects the foraging behaviour of larval and adult flies, larval reward learning, adult visual learning, and adult aversive training tasks. Sitters (for (s)) are more sedentary and aggregate within food patches whereas rovers (for(R)) have greater movement within and between food patches, suggesting that these natural variants are likely to experience different social environments. We hypothesized that social context would differentially influence rover and sitter behaviour in a cognitive task. We measured adult rover and sitter performance in a classical olfactory training test in groups and alone. All flies were reared in groups, but fly training and testing were done alone and in groups. Sitters trained and tested in a group had significantly higher learning performances compared to sitters trained and tested alone. Rovers performed similarly when trained and tested alone and in a group. In other words, rovers learning ability is independent of group training and testing. This suggests that sitters may be more sensitive to the social context than rovers. These differences in learning performance can be altered by pharmacological manipulations of PKG activity levels, the foraging (for) gene's gene product. Learning and memory is also affected by the type of social interaction (being in a group of the same strain or in a group of a different strain) in rovers, but not in sitters. These results suggest that for mediates social learning and memory in D. melanogaster.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3861308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38613082013-12-17 Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene Kohn, Nancy R. Reaume, Christopher J. Moreno, Celine Burns, James G. Sokolowski, Marla B. Mery, Frederic PLoS One Research Article In Drosophila melanogaster, natural genetic variation in the foraging gene affects the foraging behaviour of larval and adult flies, larval reward learning, adult visual learning, and adult aversive training tasks. Sitters (for (s)) are more sedentary and aggregate within food patches whereas rovers (for(R)) have greater movement within and between food patches, suggesting that these natural variants are likely to experience different social environments. We hypothesized that social context would differentially influence rover and sitter behaviour in a cognitive task. We measured adult rover and sitter performance in a classical olfactory training test in groups and alone. All flies were reared in groups, but fly training and testing were done alone and in groups. Sitters trained and tested in a group had significantly higher learning performances compared to sitters trained and tested alone. Rovers performed similarly when trained and tested alone and in a group. In other words, rovers learning ability is independent of group training and testing. This suggests that sitters may be more sensitive to the social context than rovers. These differences in learning performance can be altered by pharmacological manipulations of PKG activity levels, the foraging (for) gene's gene product. Learning and memory is also affected by the type of social interaction (being in a group of the same strain or in a group of a different strain) in rovers, but not in sitters. These results suggest that for mediates social learning and memory in D. melanogaster. Public Library of Science 2013-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3861308/ /pubmed/24349049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081272 Text en © 2013 Kohn et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kohn, Nancy R.
Reaume, Christopher J.
Moreno, Celine
Burns, James G.
Sokolowski, Marla B.
Mery, Frederic
Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene
title Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene
title_full Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene
title_fullStr Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene
title_full_unstemmed Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene
title_short Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene
title_sort social environment influences performance in a cognitive task in natural variants of the foraging gene
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3861308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349049
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081272
work_keys_str_mv AT kohnnancyr socialenvironmentinfluencesperformanceinacognitivetaskinnaturalvariantsoftheforaginggene
AT reaumechristopherj socialenvironmentinfluencesperformanceinacognitivetaskinnaturalvariantsoftheforaginggene
AT morenoceline socialenvironmentinfluencesperformanceinacognitivetaskinnaturalvariantsoftheforaginggene
AT burnsjamesg socialenvironmentinfluencesperformanceinacognitivetaskinnaturalvariantsoftheforaginggene
AT sokolowskimarlab socialenvironmentinfluencesperformanceinacognitivetaskinnaturalvariantsoftheforaginggene
AT meryfrederic socialenvironmentinfluencesperformanceinacognitivetaskinnaturalvariantsoftheforaginggene