Cargando…
Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene
In Drosophila melanogaster, natural genetic variation in the foraging gene affects the foraging behaviour of larval and adult flies, larval reward learning, adult visual learning, and adult aversive training tasks. Sitters (for (s)) are more sedentary and aggregate within food patches whereas rovers...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3861308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081272 |
_version_ | 1782295612442542080 |
---|---|
author | Kohn, Nancy R. Reaume, Christopher J. Moreno, Celine Burns, James G. Sokolowski, Marla B. Mery, Frederic |
author_facet | Kohn, Nancy R. Reaume, Christopher J. Moreno, Celine Burns, James G. Sokolowski, Marla B. Mery, Frederic |
author_sort | Kohn, Nancy R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | In Drosophila melanogaster, natural genetic variation in the foraging gene affects the foraging behaviour of larval and adult flies, larval reward learning, adult visual learning, and adult aversive training tasks. Sitters (for (s)) are more sedentary and aggregate within food patches whereas rovers (for(R)) have greater movement within and between food patches, suggesting that these natural variants are likely to experience different social environments. We hypothesized that social context would differentially influence rover and sitter behaviour in a cognitive task. We measured adult rover and sitter performance in a classical olfactory training test in groups and alone. All flies were reared in groups, but fly training and testing were done alone and in groups. Sitters trained and tested in a group had significantly higher learning performances compared to sitters trained and tested alone. Rovers performed similarly when trained and tested alone and in a group. In other words, rovers learning ability is independent of group training and testing. This suggests that sitters may be more sensitive to the social context than rovers. These differences in learning performance can be altered by pharmacological manipulations of PKG activity levels, the foraging (for) gene's gene product. Learning and memory is also affected by the type of social interaction (being in a group of the same strain or in a group of a different strain) in rovers, but not in sitters. These results suggest that for mediates social learning and memory in D. melanogaster. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3861308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38613082013-12-17 Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene Kohn, Nancy R. Reaume, Christopher J. Moreno, Celine Burns, James G. Sokolowski, Marla B. Mery, Frederic PLoS One Research Article In Drosophila melanogaster, natural genetic variation in the foraging gene affects the foraging behaviour of larval and adult flies, larval reward learning, adult visual learning, and adult aversive training tasks. Sitters (for (s)) are more sedentary and aggregate within food patches whereas rovers (for(R)) have greater movement within and between food patches, suggesting that these natural variants are likely to experience different social environments. We hypothesized that social context would differentially influence rover and sitter behaviour in a cognitive task. We measured adult rover and sitter performance in a classical olfactory training test in groups and alone. All flies were reared in groups, but fly training and testing were done alone and in groups. Sitters trained and tested in a group had significantly higher learning performances compared to sitters trained and tested alone. Rovers performed similarly when trained and tested alone and in a group. In other words, rovers learning ability is independent of group training and testing. This suggests that sitters may be more sensitive to the social context than rovers. These differences in learning performance can be altered by pharmacological manipulations of PKG activity levels, the foraging (for) gene's gene product. Learning and memory is also affected by the type of social interaction (being in a group of the same strain or in a group of a different strain) in rovers, but not in sitters. These results suggest that for mediates social learning and memory in D. melanogaster. Public Library of Science 2013-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3861308/ /pubmed/24349049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081272 Text en © 2013 Kohn et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kohn, Nancy R. Reaume, Christopher J. Moreno, Celine Burns, James G. Sokolowski, Marla B. Mery, Frederic Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene |
title | Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene |
title_full | Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene |
title_fullStr | Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene |
title_full_unstemmed | Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene |
title_short | Social Environment Influences Performance in a Cognitive Task in Natural Variants of the Foraging Gene |
title_sort | social environment influences performance in a cognitive task in natural variants of the foraging gene |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3861308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349049 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081272 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kohnnancyr socialenvironmentinfluencesperformanceinacognitivetaskinnaturalvariantsoftheforaginggene AT reaumechristopherj socialenvironmentinfluencesperformanceinacognitivetaskinnaturalvariantsoftheforaginggene AT morenoceline socialenvironmentinfluencesperformanceinacognitivetaskinnaturalvariantsoftheforaginggene AT burnsjamesg socialenvironmentinfluencesperformanceinacognitivetaskinnaturalvariantsoftheforaginggene AT sokolowskimarlab socialenvironmentinfluencesperformanceinacognitivetaskinnaturalvariantsoftheforaginggene AT meryfrederic socialenvironmentinfluencesperformanceinacognitivetaskinnaturalvariantsoftheforaginggene |