Cargando…
Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria
OBJECTIVES: To collect recent data on the susceptibility of anaerobes to antimicrobial agents with known activity against anaerobes, and to compare them with results from previous Belgian multicentre studies. METHODS: Four hundred and three strict anaerobic clinical isolates were prospectively colle...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3861333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24008826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt344 |
_version_ | 1782295615614484480 |
---|---|
author | Wybo, Ingrid Van den Bossche, Dorien Soetens, Oriane Vekens, Evilien Vandoorslaer, Kristof Claeys, Geert Glupczynski, Youri Ieven, Margareta Melin, Pierrette Nonhoff, Claire Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector Verhaegen, Jan Piérard, Denis |
author_facet | Wybo, Ingrid Van den Bossche, Dorien Soetens, Oriane Vekens, Evilien Vandoorslaer, Kristof Claeys, Geert Glupczynski, Youri Ieven, Margareta Melin, Pierrette Nonhoff, Claire Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector Verhaegen, Jan Piérard, Denis |
author_sort | Wybo, Ingrid |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To collect recent data on the susceptibility of anaerobes to antimicrobial agents with known activity against anaerobes, and to compare them with results from previous Belgian multicentre studies. METHODS: Four hundred and three strict anaerobic clinical isolates were prospectively collected from February 2011 to April 2012 in eight Belgian university hospitals. MICs were determined by one central laboratory for 11 antimicrobial agents using Etest methodology. RESULTS: According to EUCAST breakpoints, >90% of isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate (94%), piperacillin/tazobactam (91%), meropenem (96%), metronidazole (92%) and chloramphenicol (98%), but only 70% and 40% to clindamycin and penicillin, respectively. At CLSI recommended breakpoints, only 71% were susceptible to moxifloxacin and 79% to cefoxitin. MIC(50)/MIC(90) values for linezolid and for tigecycline were 1/4 and 0.5/4 mg/L, respectively. When compared with survey data from 2004, no major differences in susceptibility profiles were noticed. However, the susceptibility of Prevotella spp. and other Gram-negative bacilli to clindamycin decreased from 91% in 1993–94 and 82% in 2004 to 69% in this survey. Furthermore, the susceptibility of clostridia to moxifloxacin decreased from 88% in 2004 to 66% in 2011–12 and that of fusobacteria from 90% to 71%. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous surveys, little evolution was seen in susceptibility, except a decline in activity of clindamycin against Prevotella spp. and other Gram-negative bacteria, and of moxifloxacin against clostridia. Since resistance was detected to all antibiotics, susceptibility testing of anaerobic isolates is indicated in severe infections to confirm appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3861333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38613332013-12-13 Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria Wybo, Ingrid Van den Bossche, Dorien Soetens, Oriane Vekens, Evilien Vandoorslaer, Kristof Claeys, Geert Glupczynski, Youri Ieven, Margareta Melin, Pierrette Nonhoff, Claire Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector Verhaegen, Jan Piérard, Denis J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research OBJECTIVES: To collect recent data on the susceptibility of anaerobes to antimicrobial agents with known activity against anaerobes, and to compare them with results from previous Belgian multicentre studies. METHODS: Four hundred and three strict anaerobic clinical isolates were prospectively collected from February 2011 to April 2012 in eight Belgian university hospitals. MICs were determined by one central laboratory for 11 antimicrobial agents using Etest methodology. RESULTS: According to EUCAST breakpoints, >90% of isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate (94%), piperacillin/tazobactam (91%), meropenem (96%), metronidazole (92%) and chloramphenicol (98%), but only 70% and 40% to clindamycin and penicillin, respectively. At CLSI recommended breakpoints, only 71% were susceptible to moxifloxacin and 79% to cefoxitin. MIC(50)/MIC(90) values for linezolid and for tigecycline were 1/4 and 0.5/4 mg/L, respectively. When compared with survey data from 2004, no major differences in susceptibility profiles were noticed. However, the susceptibility of Prevotella spp. and other Gram-negative bacilli to clindamycin decreased from 91% in 1993–94 and 82% in 2004 to 69% in this survey. Furthermore, the susceptibility of clostridia to moxifloxacin decreased from 88% in 2004 to 66% in 2011–12 and that of fusobacteria from 90% to 71%. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous surveys, little evolution was seen in susceptibility, except a decline in activity of clindamycin against Prevotella spp. and other Gram-negative bacteria, and of moxifloxacin against clostridia. Since resistance was detected to all antibiotics, susceptibility testing of anaerobic isolates is indicated in severe infections to confirm appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy. Oxford University Press 2014-01 2013-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3861333/ /pubmed/24008826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt344 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Research Wybo, Ingrid Van den Bossche, Dorien Soetens, Oriane Vekens, Evilien Vandoorslaer, Kristof Claeys, Geert Glupczynski, Youri Ieven, Margareta Melin, Pierrette Nonhoff, Claire Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector Verhaegen, Jan Piérard, Denis Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria |
title | Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria |
title_full | Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria |
title_fullStr | Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria |
title_short | Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria |
title_sort | fourth belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3861333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24008826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt344 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wyboingrid fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria AT vandenbosschedorien fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria AT soetensoriane fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria AT vekensevilien fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria AT vandoorslaerkristof fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria AT claeysgeert fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria AT glupczynskiyouri fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria AT ievenmargareta fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria AT melinpierrette fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria AT nonhoffclaire fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria AT rodriguezvillaloboshector fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria AT verhaegenjan fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria AT pierarddenis fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria |