Cargando…

Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria

OBJECTIVES: To collect recent data on the susceptibility of anaerobes to antimicrobial agents with known activity against anaerobes, and to compare them with results from previous Belgian multicentre studies. METHODS: Four hundred and three strict anaerobic clinical isolates were prospectively colle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wybo, Ingrid, Van den Bossche, Dorien, Soetens, Oriane, Vekens, Evilien, Vandoorslaer, Kristof, Claeys, Geert, Glupczynski, Youri, Ieven, Margareta, Melin, Pierrette, Nonhoff, Claire, Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector, Verhaegen, Jan, Piérard, Denis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3861333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24008826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt344
_version_ 1782295615614484480
author Wybo, Ingrid
Van den Bossche, Dorien
Soetens, Oriane
Vekens, Evilien
Vandoorslaer, Kristof
Claeys, Geert
Glupczynski, Youri
Ieven, Margareta
Melin, Pierrette
Nonhoff, Claire
Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector
Verhaegen, Jan
Piérard, Denis
author_facet Wybo, Ingrid
Van den Bossche, Dorien
Soetens, Oriane
Vekens, Evilien
Vandoorslaer, Kristof
Claeys, Geert
Glupczynski, Youri
Ieven, Margareta
Melin, Pierrette
Nonhoff, Claire
Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector
Verhaegen, Jan
Piérard, Denis
author_sort Wybo, Ingrid
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To collect recent data on the susceptibility of anaerobes to antimicrobial agents with known activity against anaerobes, and to compare them with results from previous Belgian multicentre studies. METHODS: Four hundred and three strict anaerobic clinical isolates were prospectively collected from February 2011 to April 2012 in eight Belgian university hospitals. MICs were determined by one central laboratory for 11 antimicrobial agents using Etest methodology. RESULTS: According to EUCAST breakpoints, >90% of isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate (94%), piperacillin/tazobactam (91%), meropenem (96%), metronidazole (92%) and chloramphenicol (98%), but only 70% and 40% to clindamycin and penicillin, respectively. At CLSI recommended breakpoints, only 71% were susceptible to moxifloxacin and 79% to cefoxitin. MIC(50)/MIC(90) values for linezolid and for tigecycline were 1/4 and 0.5/4 mg/L, respectively. When compared with survey data from 2004, no major differences in susceptibility profiles were noticed. However, the susceptibility of Prevotella spp. and other Gram-negative bacilli to clindamycin decreased from 91% in 1993–94 and 82% in 2004 to 69% in this survey. Furthermore, the susceptibility of clostridia to moxifloxacin decreased from 88% in 2004 to 66% in 2011–12 and that of fusobacteria from 90% to 71%. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous surveys, little evolution was seen in susceptibility, except a decline in activity of clindamycin against Prevotella spp. and other Gram-negative bacteria, and of moxifloxacin against clostridia. Since resistance was detected to all antibiotics, susceptibility testing of anaerobic isolates is indicated in severe infections to confirm appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3861333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38613332013-12-13 Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria Wybo, Ingrid Van den Bossche, Dorien Soetens, Oriane Vekens, Evilien Vandoorslaer, Kristof Claeys, Geert Glupczynski, Youri Ieven, Margareta Melin, Pierrette Nonhoff, Claire Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector Verhaegen, Jan Piérard, Denis J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research OBJECTIVES: To collect recent data on the susceptibility of anaerobes to antimicrobial agents with known activity against anaerobes, and to compare them with results from previous Belgian multicentre studies. METHODS: Four hundred and three strict anaerobic clinical isolates were prospectively collected from February 2011 to April 2012 in eight Belgian university hospitals. MICs were determined by one central laboratory for 11 antimicrobial agents using Etest methodology. RESULTS: According to EUCAST breakpoints, >90% of isolates were susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanate (94%), piperacillin/tazobactam (91%), meropenem (96%), metronidazole (92%) and chloramphenicol (98%), but only 70% and 40% to clindamycin and penicillin, respectively. At CLSI recommended breakpoints, only 71% were susceptible to moxifloxacin and 79% to cefoxitin. MIC(50)/MIC(90) values for linezolid and for tigecycline were 1/4 and 0.5/4 mg/L, respectively. When compared with survey data from 2004, no major differences in susceptibility profiles were noticed. However, the susceptibility of Prevotella spp. and other Gram-negative bacilli to clindamycin decreased from 91% in 1993–94 and 82% in 2004 to 69% in this survey. Furthermore, the susceptibility of clostridia to moxifloxacin decreased from 88% in 2004 to 66% in 2011–12 and that of fusobacteria from 90% to 71%. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous surveys, little evolution was seen in susceptibility, except a decline in activity of clindamycin against Prevotella spp. and other Gram-negative bacteria, and of moxifloxacin against clostridia. Since resistance was detected to all antibiotics, susceptibility testing of anaerobic isolates is indicated in severe infections to confirm appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy. Oxford University Press 2014-01 2013-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3861333/ /pubmed/24008826 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt344 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Research
Wybo, Ingrid
Van den Bossche, Dorien
Soetens, Oriane
Vekens, Evilien
Vandoorslaer, Kristof
Claeys, Geert
Glupczynski, Youri
Ieven, Margareta
Melin, Pierrette
Nonhoff, Claire
Rodriguez-Villalobos, Hector
Verhaegen, Jan
Piérard, Denis
Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria
title Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria
title_full Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria
title_fullStr Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria
title_full_unstemmed Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria
title_short Fourth Belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria
title_sort fourth belgian multicentre survey of antibiotic susceptibility of anaerobic bacteria
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3861333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24008826
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkt344
work_keys_str_mv AT wyboingrid fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria
AT vandenbosschedorien fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria
AT soetensoriane fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria
AT vekensevilien fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria
AT vandoorslaerkristof fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria
AT claeysgeert fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria
AT glupczynskiyouri fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria
AT ievenmargareta fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria
AT melinpierrette fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria
AT nonhoffclaire fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria
AT rodriguezvillaloboshector fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria
AT verhaegenjan fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria
AT pierarddenis fourthbelgianmulticentresurveyofantibioticsusceptibilityofanaerobicbacteria