Cargando…

Is Sustained Virological Response a Marker of Treatment Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Viral Infection with No Response or Relapse to Previous Antiviral Intervention?

BACKGROUND: Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of antiviral interventions in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection use sustained virological response (SVR) as the main outcome. There is sparse information on long-term mortality from RCTs. METHODS: We created a decision tree model ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gurusamy, Kurinchi S., Wilson, Edward, Koretz, Ronald L., Allen, Victoria B., Davidson, Brian R., Burroughs, Andrew K., Gluud, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3861485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083313
_version_ 1782295647007801344
author Gurusamy, Kurinchi S.
Wilson, Edward
Koretz, Ronald L.
Allen, Victoria B.
Davidson, Brian R.
Burroughs, Andrew K.
Gluud, Christian
author_facet Gurusamy, Kurinchi S.
Wilson, Edward
Koretz, Ronald L.
Allen, Victoria B.
Davidson, Brian R.
Burroughs, Andrew K.
Gluud, Christian
author_sort Gurusamy, Kurinchi S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of antiviral interventions in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection use sustained virological response (SVR) as the main outcome. There is sparse information on long-term mortality from RCTs. METHODS: We created a decision tree model based on a Cochrane systematic review on interferon retreatment for patients who did not respond to initial therapy or who relapsed following SVR. Extrapolating data to 20 years, we modelled the outcome from three scenarios: (1) observed medium-term (5 year) annual mortality rates continue to the long term (20 years); (2) long-term annual mortality in retreatment responders falls to that of the general population while retreatment non-responders continue at the medium-term mortality; (3) long-term annual mortality in retreatment non-responders is the same as control group non-responders (i.e., the increased treatment-related medium mortality “wears off”). RESULTS: The mean differences in life expectancy over 20 years with interferon versus control in the first, second, and third scenarios were -0.34 years (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.71 to 0.03), -0.23 years (95% CI -0.69 to 0.24), and -0.01 (95% CI -0.3 to 0.27), respectively. The life expectancy was always lower in the interferon group than in the control group in scenario 1. In scenario 3, the interferon group had a longer life expectancy than the control group only when more than 7% in the interferon group achieved SVR. CONCLUSIONS: SVR may be a good prognostic marker but does not seem to be a valid surrogate marker for assessing HCV treatment efficacy of interferon retreatment. The SVR threshold at which retreatment increases life expectancy may be different for different drugs depending upon the adverse event profile and treatment efficacy. This has to be determined for each drug by RCTs and appropriate modelling before SVR can be accepted as a surrogate marker.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3861485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38614852013-12-17 Is Sustained Virological Response a Marker of Treatment Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Viral Infection with No Response or Relapse to Previous Antiviral Intervention? Gurusamy, Kurinchi S. Wilson, Edward Koretz, Ronald L. Allen, Victoria B. Davidson, Brian R. Burroughs, Andrew K. Gluud, Christian PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of antiviral interventions in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection use sustained virological response (SVR) as the main outcome. There is sparse information on long-term mortality from RCTs. METHODS: We created a decision tree model based on a Cochrane systematic review on interferon retreatment for patients who did not respond to initial therapy or who relapsed following SVR. Extrapolating data to 20 years, we modelled the outcome from three scenarios: (1) observed medium-term (5 year) annual mortality rates continue to the long term (20 years); (2) long-term annual mortality in retreatment responders falls to that of the general population while retreatment non-responders continue at the medium-term mortality; (3) long-term annual mortality in retreatment non-responders is the same as control group non-responders (i.e., the increased treatment-related medium mortality “wears off”). RESULTS: The mean differences in life expectancy over 20 years with interferon versus control in the first, second, and third scenarios were -0.34 years (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.71 to 0.03), -0.23 years (95% CI -0.69 to 0.24), and -0.01 (95% CI -0.3 to 0.27), respectively. The life expectancy was always lower in the interferon group than in the control group in scenario 1. In scenario 3, the interferon group had a longer life expectancy than the control group only when more than 7% in the interferon group achieved SVR. CONCLUSIONS: SVR may be a good prognostic marker but does not seem to be a valid surrogate marker for assessing HCV treatment efficacy of interferon retreatment. The SVR threshold at which retreatment increases life expectancy may be different for different drugs depending upon the adverse event profile and treatment efficacy. This has to be determined for each drug by RCTs and appropriate modelling before SVR can be accepted as a surrogate marker. Public Library of Science 2013-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3861485/ /pubmed/24349487 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083313 Text en © 2013 Gurusamy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gurusamy, Kurinchi S.
Wilson, Edward
Koretz, Ronald L.
Allen, Victoria B.
Davidson, Brian R.
Burroughs, Andrew K.
Gluud, Christian
Is Sustained Virological Response a Marker of Treatment Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Viral Infection with No Response or Relapse to Previous Antiviral Intervention?
title Is Sustained Virological Response a Marker of Treatment Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Viral Infection with No Response or Relapse to Previous Antiviral Intervention?
title_full Is Sustained Virological Response a Marker of Treatment Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Viral Infection with No Response or Relapse to Previous Antiviral Intervention?
title_fullStr Is Sustained Virological Response a Marker of Treatment Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Viral Infection with No Response or Relapse to Previous Antiviral Intervention?
title_full_unstemmed Is Sustained Virological Response a Marker of Treatment Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Viral Infection with No Response or Relapse to Previous Antiviral Intervention?
title_short Is Sustained Virological Response a Marker of Treatment Efficacy in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Viral Infection with No Response or Relapse to Previous Antiviral Intervention?
title_sort is sustained virological response a marker of treatment efficacy in patients with chronic hepatitis c viral infection with no response or relapse to previous antiviral intervention?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3861485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349487
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083313
work_keys_str_mv AT gurusamykurinchis issustainedvirologicalresponseamarkeroftreatmentefficacyinpatientswithchronichepatitiscviralinfectionwithnoresponseorrelapsetopreviousantiviralintervention
AT wilsonedward issustainedvirologicalresponseamarkeroftreatmentefficacyinpatientswithchronichepatitiscviralinfectionwithnoresponseorrelapsetopreviousantiviralintervention
AT koretzronaldl issustainedvirologicalresponseamarkeroftreatmentefficacyinpatientswithchronichepatitiscviralinfectionwithnoresponseorrelapsetopreviousantiviralintervention
AT allenvictoriab issustainedvirologicalresponseamarkeroftreatmentefficacyinpatientswithchronichepatitiscviralinfectionwithnoresponseorrelapsetopreviousantiviralintervention
AT davidsonbrianr issustainedvirologicalresponseamarkeroftreatmentefficacyinpatientswithchronichepatitiscviralinfectionwithnoresponseorrelapsetopreviousantiviralintervention
AT burroughsandrewk issustainedvirologicalresponseamarkeroftreatmentefficacyinpatientswithchronichepatitiscviralinfectionwithnoresponseorrelapsetopreviousantiviralintervention
AT gluudchristian issustainedvirologicalresponseamarkeroftreatmentefficacyinpatientswithchronichepatitiscviralinfectionwithnoresponseorrelapsetopreviousantiviralintervention