Cargando…

Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK

Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is commonly used to correct refractive defects. The procedure frequently results in dry eye symptoms, usually of short but sometimes longer duration. This study was designed to assess dry eye and ocular tolerability after LASIK in patients treated with a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Astakhov, Yuri S, Astakhov, Sergei Y, Lisochkina, Alla B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3862698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24353401
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S50446
_version_ 1782295775930220544
author Astakhov, Yuri S
Astakhov, Sergei Y
Lisochkina, Alla B
author_facet Astakhov, Yuri S
Astakhov, Sergei Y
Lisochkina, Alla B
author_sort Astakhov, Yuri S
collection PubMed
description Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is commonly used to correct refractive defects. The procedure frequently results in dry eye symptoms, usually of short but sometimes longer duration. This study was designed to assess dry eye and ocular tolerability after LASIK in patients treated with a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) or preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®). In a single-center, investigator-masked, prospective, noninferiority, clinical study, patients undergoing LASIK surgery were randomized to receive Hylabak or Systane eye drops (one drop in each eye four times daily for 3 months). Fluorescein test scores were the primary efficacy variable and were similar on day 1 (mean 0.26 and 0.28 for Hylabak and Systane, respectively). At the final visit (day 84 ± 3) the fluorescein scores had improved to 0.11 and 0.04, respectively. The difference was not significant and thus noninferiority was established. A trend of more rapid improvement in the Hylabak group was evident. Both treatments were well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events, discontinuations for adverse events or other safety-related reasons, and no systemic adverse events. The results suggest that Hylabak is not less effective than Systane in reducing the symptoms of dry eye after LASIK surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3862698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38626982013-12-18 Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK Astakhov, Yuri S Astakhov, Sergei Y Lisochkina, Alla B Clin Ophthalmol Original Research Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is commonly used to correct refractive defects. The procedure frequently results in dry eye symptoms, usually of short but sometimes longer duration. This study was designed to assess dry eye and ocular tolerability after LASIK in patients treated with a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) or preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®). In a single-center, investigator-masked, prospective, noninferiority, clinical study, patients undergoing LASIK surgery were randomized to receive Hylabak or Systane eye drops (one drop in each eye four times daily for 3 months). Fluorescein test scores were the primary efficacy variable and were similar on day 1 (mean 0.26 and 0.28 for Hylabak and Systane, respectively). At the final visit (day 84 ± 3) the fluorescein scores had improved to 0.11 and 0.04, respectively. The difference was not significant and thus noninferiority was established. A trend of more rapid improvement in the Hylabak group was evident. Both treatments were well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events, discontinuations for adverse events or other safety-related reasons, and no systemic adverse events. The results suggest that Hylabak is not less effective than Systane in reducing the symptoms of dry eye after LASIK surgery. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3862698/ /pubmed/24353401 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S50446 Text en © 2013 Astakhov et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Astakhov, Yuri S
Astakhov, Sergei Y
Lisochkina, Alla B
Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK
title Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK
title_full Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK
title_fullStr Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK
title_short Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK
title_sort assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (systane®) used for 3 months in patients after lasik
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3862698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24353401
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S50446
work_keys_str_mv AT astakhovyuris assessmentofdryeyesignsandsymptomsandoculartoleranceofapreservativefreelacrimalsubstitutehylabakversusapreservedlacrimalsubstitutesystaneusedfor3monthsinpatientsafterlasik
AT astakhovsergeiy assessmentofdryeyesignsandsymptomsandoculartoleranceofapreservativefreelacrimalsubstitutehylabakversusapreservedlacrimalsubstitutesystaneusedfor3monthsinpatientsafterlasik
AT lisochkinaallab assessmentofdryeyesignsandsymptomsandoculartoleranceofapreservativefreelacrimalsubstitutehylabakversusapreservedlacrimalsubstitutesystaneusedfor3monthsinpatientsafterlasik