Cargando…
Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK
Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is commonly used to correct refractive defects. The procedure frequently results in dry eye symptoms, usually of short but sometimes longer duration. This study was designed to assess dry eye and ocular tolerability after LASIK in patients treated with a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3862698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24353401 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S50446 |
_version_ | 1782295775930220544 |
---|---|
author | Astakhov, Yuri S Astakhov, Sergei Y Lisochkina, Alla B |
author_facet | Astakhov, Yuri S Astakhov, Sergei Y Lisochkina, Alla B |
author_sort | Astakhov, Yuri S |
collection | PubMed |
description | Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is commonly used to correct refractive defects. The procedure frequently results in dry eye symptoms, usually of short but sometimes longer duration. This study was designed to assess dry eye and ocular tolerability after LASIK in patients treated with a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) or preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®). In a single-center, investigator-masked, prospective, noninferiority, clinical study, patients undergoing LASIK surgery were randomized to receive Hylabak or Systane eye drops (one drop in each eye four times daily for 3 months). Fluorescein test scores were the primary efficacy variable and were similar on day 1 (mean 0.26 and 0.28 for Hylabak and Systane, respectively). At the final visit (day 84 ± 3) the fluorescein scores had improved to 0.11 and 0.04, respectively. The difference was not significant and thus noninferiority was established. A trend of more rapid improvement in the Hylabak group was evident. Both treatments were well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events, discontinuations for adverse events or other safety-related reasons, and no systemic adverse events. The results suggest that Hylabak is not less effective than Systane in reducing the symptoms of dry eye after LASIK surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3862698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38626982013-12-18 Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK Astakhov, Yuri S Astakhov, Sergei Y Lisochkina, Alla B Clin Ophthalmol Original Research Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is commonly used to correct refractive defects. The procedure frequently results in dry eye symptoms, usually of short but sometimes longer duration. This study was designed to assess dry eye and ocular tolerability after LASIK in patients treated with a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) or preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®). In a single-center, investigator-masked, prospective, noninferiority, clinical study, patients undergoing LASIK surgery were randomized to receive Hylabak or Systane eye drops (one drop in each eye four times daily for 3 months). Fluorescein test scores were the primary efficacy variable and were similar on day 1 (mean 0.26 and 0.28 for Hylabak and Systane, respectively). At the final visit (day 84 ± 3) the fluorescein scores had improved to 0.11 and 0.04, respectively. The difference was not significant and thus noninferiority was established. A trend of more rapid improvement in the Hylabak group was evident. Both treatments were well tolerated and there were no serious adverse events, discontinuations for adverse events or other safety-related reasons, and no systemic adverse events. The results suggest that Hylabak is not less effective than Systane in reducing the symptoms of dry eye after LASIK surgery. Dove Medical Press 2013 2013-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3862698/ /pubmed/24353401 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S50446 Text en © 2013 Astakhov et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Astakhov, Yuri S Astakhov, Sergei Y Lisochkina, Alla B Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK |
title | Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK |
title_full | Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK |
title_fullStr | Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK |
title_short | Assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (Hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (Systane®) used for 3 months in patients after LASIK |
title_sort | assessment of dry eye signs and symptoms and ocular tolerance of a preservative-free lacrimal substitute (hylabak®) versus a preserved lacrimal substitute (systane®) used for 3 months in patients after lasik |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3862698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24353401 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S50446 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT astakhovyuris assessmentofdryeyesignsandsymptomsandoculartoleranceofapreservativefreelacrimalsubstitutehylabakversusapreservedlacrimalsubstitutesystaneusedfor3monthsinpatientsafterlasik AT astakhovsergeiy assessmentofdryeyesignsandsymptomsandoculartoleranceofapreservativefreelacrimalsubstitutehylabakversusapreservedlacrimalsubstitutesystaneusedfor3monthsinpatientsafterlasik AT lisochkinaallab assessmentofdryeyesignsandsymptomsandoculartoleranceofapreservativefreelacrimalsubstitutehylabakversusapreservedlacrimalsubstitutesystaneusedfor3monthsinpatientsafterlasik |