Cargando…

Auditory Cortex Processes Variation in Our Own Speech

As we talk, we unconsciously adjust our speech to ensure it sounds the way we intend it to sound. However, because speech production involves complex motor planning and execution, no two utterances of the same sound will be exactly the same. Here, we show that auditory cortex is sensitive to natural...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sitek, Kevin R., Mathalon, Daniel H., Roach, Brian J., Houde, John F., Niziolek, Caroline A., Ford, Judith M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3862760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082925
_version_ 1782295782989234176
author Sitek, Kevin R.
Mathalon, Daniel H.
Roach, Brian J.
Houde, John F.
Niziolek, Caroline A.
Ford, Judith M.
author_facet Sitek, Kevin R.
Mathalon, Daniel H.
Roach, Brian J.
Houde, John F.
Niziolek, Caroline A.
Ford, Judith M.
author_sort Sitek, Kevin R.
collection PubMed
description As we talk, we unconsciously adjust our speech to ensure it sounds the way we intend it to sound. However, because speech production involves complex motor planning and execution, no two utterances of the same sound will be exactly the same. Here, we show that auditory cortex is sensitive to natural variations in self-produced speech from utterance to utterance. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) from ninety-nine subjects while they uttered “ah” and while they listened to those speech sounds played back. Subjects' utterances were sorted based on their formant deviations from the previous utterance. Typically, the N1 ERP component is suppressed during talking compared to listening. By comparing ERPs to the least and most variable utterances, we found that N1 was less suppressed to utterances that differed greatly from their preceding neighbors. In contrast, an utterance's difference from the median formant values did not affect N1. Trial-to-trial pitch (f0) deviation and pitch difference from the median similarly did not affect N1. We discuss mechanisms that may underlie the change in N1 suppression resulting from trial-to-trial formant change. Deviant utterances require additional auditory cortical processing, suggesting that speaking-induced suppression mechanisms are optimally tuned for a specific production.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3862760
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38627602013-12-17 Auditory Cortex Processes Variation in Our Own Speech Sitek, Kevin R. Mathalon, Daniel H. Roach, Brian J. Houde, John F. Niziolek, Caroline A. Ford, Judith M. PLoS One Research Article As we talk, we unconsciously adjust our speech to ensure it sounds the way we intend it to sound. However, because speech production involves complex motor planning and execution, no two utterances of the same sound will be exactly the same. Here, we show that auditory cortex is sensitive to natural variations in self-produced speech from utterance to utterance. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) from ninety-nine subjects while they uttered “ah” and while they listened to those speech sounds played back. Subjects' utterances were sorted based on their formant deviations from the previous utterance. Typically, the N1 ERP component is suppressed during talking compared to listening. By comparing ERPs to the least and most variable utterances, we found that N1 was less suppressed to utterances that differed greatly from their preceding neighbors. In contrast, an utterance's difference from the median formant values did not affect N1. Trial-to-trial pitch (f0) deviation and pitch difference from the median similarly did not affect N1. We discuss mechanisms that may underlie the change in N1 suppression resulting from trial-to-trial formant change. Deviant utterances require additional auditory cortical processing, suggesting that speaking-induced suppression mechanisms are optimally tuned for a specific production. Public Library of Science 2013-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3862760/ /pubmed/24349399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082925 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sitek, Kevin R.
Mathalon, Daniel H.
Roach, Brian J.
Houde, John F.
Niziolek, Caroline A.
Ford, Judith M.
Auditory Cortex Processes Variation in Our Own Speech
title Auditory Cortex Processes Variation in Our Own Speech
title_full Auditory Cortex Processes Variation in Our Own Speech
title_fullStr Auditory Cortex Processes Variation in Our Own Speech
title_full_unstemmed Auditory Cortex Processes Variation in Our Own Speech
title_short Auditory Cortex Processes Variation in Our Own Speech
title_sort auditory cortex processes variation in our own speech
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3862760/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24349399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082925
work_keys_str_mv AT sitekkevinr auditorycortexprocessesvariationinourownspeech
AT mathalondanielh auditorycortexprocessesvariationinourownspeech
AT roachbrianj auditorycortexprocessesvariationinourownspeech
AT houdejohnf auditorycortexprocessesvariationinourownspeech
AT niziolekcarolinea auditorycortexprocessesvariationinourownspeech
AT fordjudithm auditorycortexprocessesvariationinourownspeech