Cargando…

Parent-led or baby-led? Associations between complementary feeding practices and health-related behaviours in a survey of New Zealand families

OBJECTIVE: To determine feeding practices and selected health-related behaviours in New Zealand families following a ‘baby-led’ or more traditional ‘parent-led’ method for introducing complementary foods. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 199 mothers completed an online survey about introducing comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cameron, Sonya L, Taylor, Rachael W, Heath, Anne-Louise M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3863128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24327363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003946
_version_ 1782295800803491840
author Cameron, Sonya L
Taylor, Rachael W
Heath, Anne-Louise M
author_facet Cameron, Sonya L
Taylor, Rachael W
Heath, Anne-Louise M
author_sort Cameron, Sonya L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine feeding practices and selected health-related behaviours in New Zealand families following a ‘baby-led’ or more traditional ‘parent-led’ method for introducing complementary foods. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 199 mothers completed an online survey about introducing complementary foods to their infant. Participants were classified into one of four groups: ‘adherent baby-led weaning (BLW)’, the infant mostly or entirely fed themselves at 6–7 months; ‘self-identified BLW’, mothers reported following BLW at 6–7 months but were using spoon-feeding at least half the time; ‘parent-led feeding’, the mother reported not having tried BLW; and ‘unclassified method’, the mother reported they were not following BLW at 6–7 months but reported the infant mostly or entirely fed themselves at 6–7 months. RESULTS: 8% were following ‘adherent BLW’, 21% ‘self-identified BLW’ and 0% were following the ‘unclassified method’. Compared with ‘self-identified BLW’ and ‘parent-led feeding’, a higher proportion of the ‘adherent BLW’ met the WHO recommendations to exclusively breastfeed for 6 months and to introduce complementary foods at 6 months. The ‘adherent BLW’ group was more likely to have family foods (p=0.018), and less likely (p=0.002) to have commercially prepared baby food. Both BLW groups were more likely to share meals with the family compared with ‘parent-led feeding’. In contrast to ‘self-identified BLW’ and ‘parent-led feeding’, the ‘adherent BLW’ group did not offer iron-fortified cereal as a first food. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that although many parents consider they follow BLW, a very few are following it strictly. The extent to which BLW was followed was associated with potential benefits (eg, sharing family meals) and risks (eg, low iron first foods) highlighting the importance for health professionals and researchers of accurately determining the extent of adherence to BLW.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3863128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38631282013-12-16 Parent-led or baby-led? Associations between complementary feeding practices and health-related behaviours in a survey of New Zealand families Cameron, Sonya L Taylor, Rachael W Heath, Anne-Louise M BMJ Open Nutrition and Metabolism OBJECTIVE: To determine feeding practices and selected health-related behaviours in New Zealand families following a ‘baby-led’ or more traditional ‘parent-led’ method for introducing complementary foods. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 199 mothers completed an online survey about introducing complementary foods to their infant. Participants were classified into one of four groups: ‘adherent baby-led weaning (BLW)’, the infant mostly or entirely fed themselves at 6–7 months; ‘self-identified BLW’, mothers reported following BLW at 6–7 months but were using spoon-feeding at least half the time; ‘parent-led feeding’, the mother reported not having tried BLW; and ‘unclassified method’, the mother reported they were not following BLW at 6–7 months but reported the infant mostly or entirely fed themselves at 6–7 months. RESULTS: 8% were following ‘adherent BLW’, 21% ‘self-identified BLW’ and 0% were following the ‘unclassified method’. Compared with ‘self-identified BLW’ and ‘parent-led feeding’, a higher proportion of the ‘adherent BLW’ met the WHO recommendations to exclusively breastfeed for 6 months and to introduce complementary foods at 6 months. The ‘adherent BLW’ group was more likely to have family foods (p=0.018), and less likely (p=0.002) to have commercially prepared baby food. Both BLW groups were more likely to share meals with the family compared with ‘parent-led feeding’. In contrast to ‘self-identified BLW’ and ‘parent-led feeding’, the ‘adherent BLW’ group did not offer iron-fortified cereal as a first food. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that although many parents consider they follow BLW, a very few are following it strictly. The extent to which BLW was followed was associated with potential benefits (eg, sharing family meals) and risks (eg, low iron first foods) highlighting the importance for health professionals and researchers of accurately determining the extent of adherence to BLW. BMJ Publishing Group 2013-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3863128/ /pubmed/24327363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003946 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Nutrition and Metabolism
Cameron, Sonya L
Taylor, Rachael W
Heath, Anne-Louise M
Parent-led or baby-led? Associations between complementary feeding practices and health-related behaviours in a survey of New Zealand families
title Parent-led or baby-led? Associations between complementary feeding practices and health-related behaviours in a survey of New Zealand families
title_full Parent-led or baby-led? Associations between complementary feeding practices and health-related behaviours in a survey of New Zealand families
title_fullStr Parent-led or baby-led? Associations between complementary feeding practices and health-related behaviours in a survey of New Zealand families
title_full_unstemmed Parent-led or baby-led? Associations between complementary feeding practices and health-related behaviours in a survey of New Zealand families
title_short Parent-led or baby-led? Associations between complementary feeding practices and health-related behaviours in a survey of New Zealand families
title_sort parent-led or baby-led? associations between complementary feeding practices and health-related behaviours in a survey of new zealand families
topic Nutrition and Metabolism
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3863128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24327363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003946
work_keys_str_mv AT cameronsonyal parentledorbabyledassociationsbetweencomplementaryfeedingpracticesandhealthrelatedbehavioursinasurveyofnewzealandfamilies
AT taylorrachaelw parentledorbabyledassociationsbetweencomplementaryfeedingpracticesandhealthrelatedbehavioursinasurveyofnewzealandfamilies
AT heathannelouisem parentledorbabyledassociationsbetweencomplementaryfeedingpracticesandhealthrelatedbehavioursinasurveyofnewzealandfamilies