Cargando…

SEM Study of Root Canal Walls Cleanliness after Ni-Ti Rotary and Hand Instrumentation

INTRODUCTION: To compare the cleaning effectiveness of K3 and Race NiTi rotary systems with K-Flexo file instruments during the preparation of curved canals in extracted human teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 root canals of mandibular and maxillary molars with curvatures ranging between 2...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khadivi Nia Javan, Noosha, Mohajeri Baradaran, Ladan, Azimi, Shahram
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3863406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24348651
_version_ 1782295804735651840
author Khadivi Nia Javan, Noosha
Mohajeri Baradaran, Ladan
Azimi, Shahram
author_facet Khadivi Nia Javan, Noosha
Mohajeri Baradaran, Ladan
Azimi, Shahram
author_sort Khadivi Nia Javan, Noosha
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To compare the cleaning effectiveness of K3 and Race NiTi rotary systems with K-Flexo file instruments during the preparation of curved canals in extracted human teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 root canals of mandibular and maxillary molars with curvatures ranging between 25º and 35 º were divided in three groups of 15 each and 5 as negative control groups. Canals were prepared using a low torque control motor in two rotary groups according to manufacturer’s instructions. Conventional Step back with S.S K files was the preparation technique in third group. The amount of debris and smear layer was quantified on the basis of a numerical evaluation scale. The data were statistically analyzed using Chi-Square and Likelihood Ratio tests. RESULTS: In general, no significant difference in terms of amount of debris were found among three groups, only in apical zones of Race and K-Flexo file groups a significant difference was detected (P=0.041). Race rotary system left significantly less smear layer than k-Flexo file in the middle (P=0.009) and apical thirds (P=0.012), respectively. K3 significantly achieved higher scores of cleanliness than K-Flexo file in apical third only (P=0.049). No significant difference between Race and K3 rotary groups for residual debris and formed smear layer was detected. CONCLUSION: Obtaining higher scores of cleanliness in various regions of the canals, crown down technique and the use of rotary instrumentation seem to be superior to conventional hand instrumentation with step back technique .No significant difference between K3 with three radial lands and Race with three cutting edges in terms of debris and smear layer formation was detected.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3863406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Iranian Center for Endodontic Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38634062013-12-16 SEM Study of Root Canal Walls Cleanliness after Ni-Ti Rotary and Hand Instrumentation Khadivi Nia Javan, Noosha Mohajeri Baradaran, Ladan Azimi, Shahram Iran Endod J Original Article INTRODUCTION: To compare the cleaning effectiveness of K3 and Race NiTi rotary systems with K-Flexo file instruments during the preparation of curved canals in extracted human teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 50 root canals of mandibular and maxillary molars with curvatures ranging between 25º and 35 º were divided in three groups of 15 each and 5 as negative control groups. Canals were prepared using a low torque control motor in two rotary groups according to manufacturer’s instructions. Conventional Step back with S.S K files was the preparation technique in third group. The amount of debris and smear layer was quantified on the basis of a numerical evaluation scale. The data were statistically analyzed using Chi-Square and Likelihood Ratio tests. RESULTS: In general, no significant difference in terms of amount of debris were found among three groups, only in apical zones of Race and K-Flexo file groups a significant difference was detected (P=0.041). Race rotary system left significantly less smear layer than k-Flexo file in the middle (P=0.009) and apical thirds (P=0.012), respectively. K3 significantly achieved higher scores of cleanliness than K-Flexo file in apical third only (P=0.049). No significant difference between Race and K3 rotary groups for residual debris and formed smear layer was detected. CONCLUSION: Obtaining higher scores of cleanliness in various regions of the canals, crown down technique and the use of rotary instrumentation seem to be superior to conventional hand instrumentation with step back technique .No significant difference between K3 with three radial lands and Race with three cutting edges in terms of debris and smear layer formation was detected. Iranian Center for Endodontic Research 2007 2007-04-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3863406/ /pubmed/24348651 Text en © 2007, Iranian Center for Endodontic Research This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Khadivi Nia Javan, Noosha
Mohajeri Baradaran, Ladan
Azimi, Shahram
SEM Study of Root Canal Walls Cleanliness after Ni-Ti Rotary and Hand Instrumentation
title SEM Study of Root Canal Walls Cleanliness after Ni-Ti Rotary and Hand Instrumentation
title_full SEM Study of Root Canal Walls Cleanliness after Ni-Ti Rotary and Hand Instrumentation
title_fullStr SEM Study of Root Canal Walls Cleanliness after Ni-Ti Rotary and Hand Instrumentation
title_full_unstemmed SEM Study of Root Canal Walls Cleanliness after Ni-Ti Rotary and Hand Instrumentation
title_short SEM Study of Root Canal Walls Cleanliness after Ni-Ti Rotary and Hand Instrumentation
title_sort sem study of root canal walls cleanliness after ni-ti rotary and hand instrumentation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3863406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24348651
work_keys_str_mv AT khadiviniajavannoosha semstudyofrootcanalwallscleanlinessafternitirotaryandhandinstrumentation
AT mohajeribaradaranladan semstudyofrootcanalwallscleanlinessafternitirotaryandhandinstrumentation
AT azimishahram semstudyofrootcanalwallscleanlinessafternitirotaryandhandinstrumentation