Cargando…
A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain
Previous studies have investigated both structural and functional brain networks via graph-theoretical methods. However, there is an important issue that has not been adequately discussed before: what is the optimal theoretical graph model for describing the structural networks of human brain? In th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3863486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/201735 |
_version_ | 1782295821728874496 |
---|---|
author | Li, Xiaojin Hu, Xintao Jin, Changfeng Han, Junwei Liu, Tianming Guo, Lei Hao, Wei Li, Lingjiang |
author_facet | Li, Xiaojin Hu, Xintao Jin, Changfeng Han, Junwei Liu, Tianming Guo, Lei Hao, Wei Li, Lingjiang |
author_sort | Li, Xiaojin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous studies have investigated both structural and functional brain networks via graph-theoretical methods. However, there is an important issue that has not been adequately discussed before: what is the optimal theoretical graph model for describing the structural networks of human brain? In this paper, we perform a comparative study to address this problem. Firstly, large-scale cortical regions of interest (ROIs) are localized by recently developed and validated brain reference system named Dense Individualized Common Connectivity-based Cortical Landmarks (DICCCOL) to address the limitations in the identification of the brain network ROIs in previous studies. Then, we construct structural brain networks based on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. Afterwards, the global and local graph properties of the constructed structural brain networks are measured using the state-of-the-art graph analysis algorithms and tools and are further compared with seven popular theoretical graph models. In addition, we compare the topological properties between two graph models, namely, stickiness-index-based model (STICKY) and scale-free gene duplication model (SF-GD), that have higher similarity with the real structural brain networks in terms of global and local graph properties. Our experimental results suggest that among the seven theoretical graph models compared in this study, STICKY and SF-GD models have better performances in characterizing the structural human brain network. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3863486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38634862013-12-25 A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain Li, Xiaojin Hu, Xintao Jin, Changfeng Han, Junwei Liu, Tianming Guo, Lei Hao, Wei Li, Lingjiang Int J Biomed Imaging Research Article Previous studies have investigated both structural and functional brain networks via graph-theoretical methods. However, there is an important issue that has not been adequately discussed before: what is the optimal theoretical graph model for describing the structural networks of human brain? In this paper, we perform a comparative study to address this problem. Firstly, large-scale cortical regions of interest (ROIs) are localized by recently developed and validated brain reference system named Dense Individualized Common Connectivity-based Cortical Landmarks (DICCCOL) to address the limitations in the identification of the brain network ROIs in previous studies. Then, we construct structural brain networks based on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. Afterwards, the global and local graph properties of the constructed structural brain networks are measured using the state-of-the-art graph analysis algorithms and tools and are further compared with seven popular theoretical graph models. In addition, we compare the topological properties between two graph models, namely, stickiness-index-based model (STICKY) and scale-free gene duplication model (SF-GD), that have higher similarity with the real structural brain networks in terms of global and local graph properties. Our experimental results suggest that among the seven theoretical graph models compared in this study, STICKY and SF-GD models have better performances in characterizing the structural human brain network. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3863486/ /pubmed/24369454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/201735 Text en Copyright © 2013 Xiaojin Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Xiaojin Hu, Xintao Jin, Changfeng Han, Junwei Liu, Tianming Guo, Lei Hao, Wei Li, Lingjiang A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain |
title | A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain |
title_full | A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain |
title_short | A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain |
title_sort | comparative study of theoretical graph models for characterizing structural networks of human brain |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3863486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/201735 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lixiaojin acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT huxintao acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT jinchangfeng acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT hanjunwei acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT liutianming acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT guolei acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT haowei acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT lilingjiang acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT lixiaojin comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT huxintao comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT jinchangfeng comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT hanjunwei comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT liutianming comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT guolei comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT haowei comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain AT lilingjiang comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain |