Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain

Previous studies have investigated both structural and functional brain networks via graph-theoretical methods. However, there is an important issue that has not been adequately discussed before: what is the optimal theoretical graph model for describing the structural networks of human brain? In th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xiaojin, Hu, Xintao, Jin, Changfeng, Han, Junwei, Liu, Tianming, Guo, Lei, Hao, Wei, Li, Lingjiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3863486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/201735
_version_ 1782295821728874496
author Li, Xiaojin
Hu, Xintao
Jin, Changfeng
Han, Junwei
Liu, Tianming
Guo, Lei
Hao, Wei
Li, Lingjiang
author_facet Li, Xiaojin
Hu, Xintao
Jin, Changfeng
Han, Junwei
Liu, Tianming
Guo, Lei
Hao, Wei
Li, Lingjiang
author_sort Li, Xiaojin
collection PubMed
description Previous studies have investigated both structural and functional brain networks via graph-theoretical methods. However, there is an important issue that has not been adequately discussed before: what is the optimal theoretical graph model for describing the structural networks of human brain? In this paper, we perform a comparative study to address this problem. Firstly, large-scale cortical regions of interest (ROIs) are localized by recently developed and validated brain reference system named Dense Individualized Common Connectivity-based Cortical Landmarks (DICCCOL) to address the limitations in the identification of the brain network ROIs in previous studies. Then, we construct structural brain networks based on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. Afterwards, the global and local graph properties of the constructed structural brain networks are measured using the state-of-the-art graph analysis algorithms and tools and are further compared with seven popular theoretical graph models. In addition, we compare the topological properties between two graph models, namely, stickiness-index-based model (STICKY) and scale-free gene duplication model (SF-GD), that have higher similarity with the real structural brain networks in terms of global and local graph properties. Our experimental results suggest that among the seven theoretical graph models compared in this study, STICKY and SF-GD models have better performances in characterizing the structural human brain network.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3863486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38634862013-12-25 A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain Li, Xiaojin Hu, Xintao Jin, Changfeng Han, Junwei Liu, Tianming Guo, Lei Hao, Wei Li, Lingjiang Int J Biomed Imaging Research Article Previous studies have investigated both structural and functional brain networks via graph-theoretical methods. However, there is an important issue that has not been adequately discussed before: what is the optimal theoretical graph model for describing the structural networks of human brain? In this paper, we perform a comparative study to address this problem. Firstly, large-scale cortical regions of interest (ROIs) are localized by recently developed and validated brain reference system named Dense Individualized Common Connectivity-based Cortical Landmarks (DICCCOL) to address the limitations in the identification of the brain network ROIs in previous studies. Then, we construct structural brain networks based on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data. Afterwards, the global and local graph properties of the constructed structural brain networks are measured using the state-of-the-art graph analysis algorithms and tools and are further compared with seven popular theoretical graph models. In addition, we compare the topological properties between two graph models, namely, stickiness-index-based model (STICKY) and scale-free gene duplication model (SF-GD), that have higher similarity with the real structural brain networks in terms of global and local graph properties. Our experimental results suggest that among the seven theoretical graph models compared in this study, STICKY and SF-GD models have better performances in characterizing the structural human brain network. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3863486/ /pubmed/24369454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/201735 Text en Copyright © 2013 Xiaojin Li et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Xiaojin
Hu, Xintao
Jin, Changfeng
Han, Junwei
Liu, Tianming
Guo, Lei
Hao, Wei
Li, Lingjiang
A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain
title A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain
title_full A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain
title_short A Comparative Study of Theoretical Graph Models for Characterizing Structural Networks of Human Brain
title_sort comparative study of theoretical graph models for characterizing structural networks of human brain
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3863486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/201735
work_keys_str_mv AT lixiaojin acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT huxintao acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT jinchangfeng acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT hanjunwei acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT liutianming acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT guolei acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT haowei acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT lilingjiang acomparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT lixiaojin comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT huxintao comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT jinchangfeng comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT hanjunwei comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT liutianming comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT guolei comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT haowei comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain
AT lilingjiang comparativestudyoftheoreticalgraphmodelsforcharacterizingstructuralnetworksofhumanbrain