Cargando…
Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT
Purpose. To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning classifiers (MLCs) using retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and optic nerve (ON) parameters obtained with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods. Fifty-seven patients with early to moderate primary open angle g...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3863536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/789129 |
_version_ | 1782295832883625984 |
---|---|
author | Barella, Kleyton Arlindo Costa, Vital Paulino Gonçalves Vidotti, Vanessa Silva, Fabrício Reis Dias, Marcelo Gomi, Edson Satoshi |
author_facet | Barella, Kleyton Arlindo Costa, Vital Paulino Gonçalves Vidotti, Vanessa Silva, Fabrício Reis Dias, Marcelo Gomi, Edson Satoshi |
author_sort | Barella, Kleyton Arlindo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning classifiers (MLCs) using retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and optic nerve (ON) parameters obtained with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods. Fifty-seven patients with early to moderate primary open angle glaucoma and 46 healthy patients were recruited. All 103 patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination, achromatic standard automated perimetry, and imaging with SD-OCT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built for RNFL and ON parameters. Ten MLCs were tested. Areas under ROC curves (aROCs) obtained for each SD-OCT parameter and MLC were compared. Results. The mean age was 56.5 ± 8.9 years for healthy individuals and 59.9 ± 9.0 years for glaucoma patients (P = 0.054). Mean deviation values were −1.4 dB for healthy individuals and −4.0 dB for glaucoma patients (P < 0.001). SD-OCT parameters with the greatest aROCs were cup/disc area ratio (0.846) and average cup/disc (0.843). aROCs obtained with classifiers varied from 0.687 (CTREE) to 0.877 (RAN). The aROC obtained with RAN (0.877) was not significantly different from the aROC obtained with the best single SD-OCT parameter (0.846) (P = 0.542). Conclusion. MLCs showed good accuracy but did not improve the sensitivity and specificity of SD-OCT for the diagnosis of glaucoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3863536 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38635362013-12-25 Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT Barella, Kleyton Arlindo Costa, Vital Paulino Gonçalves Vidotti, Vanessa Silva, Fabrício Reis Dias, Marcelo Gomi, Edson Satoshi J Ophthalmol Clinical Study Purpose. To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning classifiers (MLCs) using retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and optic nerve (ON) parameters obtained with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods. Fifty-seven patients with early to moderate primary open angle glaucoma and 46 healthy patients were recruited. All 103 patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination, achromatic standard automated perimetry, and imaging with SD-OCT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built for RNFL and ON parameters. Ten MLCs were tested. Areas under ROC curves (aROCs) obtained for each SD-OCT parameter and MLC were compared. Results. The mean age was 56.5 ± 8.9 years for healthy individuals and 59.9 ± 9.0 years for glaucoma patients (P = 0.054). Mean deviation values were −1.4 dB for healthy individuals and −4.0 dB for glaucoma patients (P < 0.001). SD-OCT parameters with the greatest aROCs were cup/disc area ratio (0.846) and average cup/disc (0.843). aROCs obtained with classifiers varied from 0.687 (CTREE) to 0.877 (RAN). The aROC obtained with RAN (0.877) was not significantly different from the aROC obtained with the best single SD-OCT parameter (0.846) (P = 0.542). Conclusion. MLCs showed good accuracy but did not improve the sensitivity and specificity of SD-OCT for the diagnosis of glaucoma. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3863536/ /pubmed/24369495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/789129 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kleyton Arlindo Barella et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Barella, Kleyton Arlindo Costa, Vital Paulino Gonçalves Vidotti, Vanessa Silva, Fabrício Reis Dias, Marcelo Gomi, Edson Satoshi Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT |
title | Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT |
title_full | Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT |
title_fullStr | Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT |
title_full_unstemmed | Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT |
title_short | Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT |
title_sort | glaucoma diagnostic accuracy of machine learning classifiers using retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve data from sd-oct |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3863536/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/789129 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barellakleytonarlindo glaucomadiagnosticaccuracyofmachinelearningclassifiersusingretinalnervefiberlayerandopticnervedatafromsdoct AT costavitalpaulino glaucomadiagnosticaccuracyofmachinelearningclassifiersusingretinalnervefiberlayerandopticnervedatafromsdoct AT goncalvesvidottivanessa glaucomadiagnosticaccuracyofmachinelearningclassifiersusingretinalnervefiberlayerandopticnervedatafromsdoct AT silvafabricioreis glaucomadiagnosticaccuracyofmachinelearningclassifiersusingretinalnervefiberlayerandopticnervedatafromsdoct AT diasmarcelo glaucomadiagnosticaccuracyofmachinelearningclassifiersusingretinalnervefiberlayerandopticnervedatafromsdoct AT gomiedsonsatoshi glaucomadiagnosticaccuracyofmachinelearningclassifiersusingretinalnervefiberlayerandopticnervedatafromsdoct |