Cargando…

Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT

Purpose. To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning classifiers (MLCs) using retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and optic nerve (ON) parameters obtained with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods. Fifty-seven patients with early to moderate primary open angle g...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barella, Kleyton Arlindo, Costa, Vital Paulino, Gonçalves Vidotti, Vanessa, Silva, Fabrício Reis, Dias, Marcelo, Gomi, Edson Satoshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3863536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/789129
_version_ 1782295832883625984
author Barella, Kleyton Arlindo
Costa, Vital Paulino
Gonçalves Vidotti, Vanessa
Silva, Fabrício Reis
Dias, Marcelo
Gomi, Edson Satoshi
author_facet Barella, Kleyton Arlindo
Costa, Vital Paulino
Gonçalves Vidotti, Vanessa
Silva, Fabrício Reis
Dias, Marcelo
Gomi, Edson Satoshi
author_sort Barella, Kleyton Arlindo
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning classifiers (MLCs) using retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and optic nerve (ON) parameters obtained with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods. Fifty-seven patients with early to moderate primary open angle glaucoma and 46 healthy patients were recruited. All 103 patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination, achromatic standard automated perimetry, and imaging with SD-OCT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built for RNFL and ON parameters. Ten MLCs were tested. Areas under ROC curves (aROCs) obtained for each SD-OCT parameter and MLC were compared. Results. The mean age was 56.5 ± 8.9 years for healthy individuals and 59.9 ± 9.0 years for glaucoma patients (P = 0.054). Mean deviation values were −1.4 dB for healthy individuals and −4.0 dB for glaucoma patients (P < 0.001). SD-OCT parameters with the greatest aROCs were cup/disc area ratio (0.846) and average cup/disc (0.843). aROCs obtained with classifiers varied from 0.687 (CTREE) to 0.877 (RAN). The aROC obtained with RAN (0.877) was not significantly different from the aROC obtained with the best single SD-OCT parameter (0.846) (P = 0.542). Conclusion. MLCs showed good accuracy but did not improve the sensitivity and specificity of SD-OCT for the diagnosis of glaucoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3863536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38635362013-12-25 Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT Barella, Kleyton Arlindo Costa, Vital Paulino Gonçalves Vidotti, Vanessa Silva, Fabrício Reis Dias, Marcelo Gomi, Edson Satoshi J Ophthalmol Clinical Study Purpose. To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of machine learning classifiers (MLCs) using retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and optic nerve (ON) parameters obtained with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods. Fifty-seven patients with early to moderate primary open angle glaucoma and 46 healthy patients were recruited. All 103 patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination, achromatic standard automated perimetry, and imaging with SD-OCT. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were built for RNFL and ON parameters. Ten MLCs were tested. Areas under ROC curves (aROCs) obtained for each SD-OCT parameter and MLC were compared. Results. The mean age was 56.5 ± 8.9 years for healthy individuals and 59.9 ± 9.0 years for glaucoma patients (P = 0.054). Mean deviation values were −1.4 dB for healthy individuals and −4.0 dB for glaucoma patients (P < 0.001). SD-OCT parameters with the greatest aROCs were cup/disc area ratio (0.846) and average cup/disc (0.843). aROCs obtained with classifiers varied from 0.687 (CTREE) to 0.877 (RAN). The aROC obtained with RAN (0.877) was not significantly different from the aROC obtained with the best single SD-OCT parameter (0.846) (P = 0.542). Conclusion. MLCs showed good accuracy but did not improve the sensitivity and specificity of SD-OCT for the diagnosis of glaucoma. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3863536/ /pubmed/24369495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/789129 Text en Copyright © 2013 Kleyton Arlindo Barella et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Barella, Kleyton Arlindo
Costa, Vital Paulino
Gonçalves Vidotti, Vanessa
Silva, Fabrício Reis
Dias, Marcelo
Gomi, Edson Satoshi
Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT
title Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT
title_full Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT
title_fullStr Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT
title_full_unstemmed Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT
title_short Glaucoma Diagnostic Accuracy of Machine Learning Classifiers Using Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer and Optic Nerve Data from SD-OCT
title_sort glaucoma diagnostic accuracy of machine learning classifiers using retinal nerve fiber layer and optic nerve data from sd-oct
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3863536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/789129
work_keys_str_mv AT barellakleytonarlindo glaucomadiagnosticaccuracyofmachinelearningclassifiersusingretinalnervefiberlayerandopticnervedatafromsdoct
AT costavitalpaulino glaucomadiagnosticaccuracyofmachinelearningclassifiersusingretinalnervefiberlayerandopticnervedatafromsdoct
AT goncalvesvidottivanessa glaucomadiagnosticaccuracyofmachinelearningclassifiersusingretinalnervefiberlayerandopticnervedatafromsdoct
AT silvafabricioreis glaucomadiagnosticaccuracyofmachinelearningclassifiersusingretinalnervefiberlayerandopticnervedatafromsdoct
AT diasmarcelo glaucomadiagnosticaccuracyofmachinelearningclassifiersusingretinalnervefiberlayerandopticnervedatafromsdoct
AT gomiedsonsatoshi glaucomadiagnosticaccuracyofmachinelearningclassifiersusingretinalnervefiberlayerandopticnervedatafromsdoct