Cargando…

“People power” or “pester power”? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy()

OBJECTIVE: Venoplasty has been proposed, alongside the theory of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI), as a treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). Despite concerns about its efficacy and safety, thousands of patients have undergone the procedure. This paper analyses YouTube videos wher...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazanderani, Fadhila, O’Neill, Braden, Powell, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3863946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23830239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.006
_version_ 1782295879285211136
author Mazanderani, Fadhila
O’Neill, Braden
Powell, John
author_facet Mazanderani, Fadhila
O’Neill, Braden
Powell, John
author_sort Mazanderani, Fadhila
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Venoplasty has been proposed, alongside the theory of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI), as a treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). Despite concerns about its efficacy and safety, thousands of patients have undergone the procedure. This paper analyses YouTube videos where patients have shared their treatment experiences. METHODS: Content analysis on the 100 most viewed videos from over 4000 identified in a search for ‘CCSVI’, and qualitative thematic analysis on popular ‘channels’ demonstrating patients’ experiences. RESULTS: Videos adopt an overwhelmingly positive stance towards CCSVI; many were uploaded by patients and present pre- and/or post-treatment experiences. Patients demonstrate rather than merely describe their symptoms, performing tests on themselves before and after treatment to quantify improvement. Videos combine medical terminology and tests with personal experiences of living with MS. CONCLUSION: Social media technologies provide patients with novel opportunities for advocating for particular treatments; generating alternative forms of ‘evidence’ built on a hybrid of personal experience and medical knowledge. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare practitioners need to engage with new digital forms of content, including online social media. Instead of disregarding sources not considered ‘evidence-based’, practitioners should enhance their understanding of what ‘experiential-evidence’ is deemed significant to patients, particularly in contested areas of healthcare.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3863946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38639462013-12-17 “People power” or “pester power”? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy() Mazanderani, Fadhila O’Neill, Braden Powell, John Patient Educ Couns Article OBJECTIVE: Venoplasty has been proposed, alongside the theory of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI), as a treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS). Despite concerns about its efficacy and safety, thousands of patients have undergone the procedure. This paper analyses YouTube videos where patients have shared their treatment experiences. METHODS: Content analysis on the 100 most viewed videos from over 4000 identified in a search for ‘CCSVI’, and qualitative thematic analysis on popular ‘channels’ demonstrating patients’ experiences. RESULTS: Videos adopt an overwhelmingly positive stance towards CCSVI; many were uploaded by patients and present pre- and/or post-treatment experiences. Patients demonstrate rather than merely describe their symptoms, performing tests on themselves before and after treatment to quantify improvement. Videos combine medical terminology and tests with personal experiences of living with MS. CONCLUSION: Social media technologies provide patients with novel opportunities for advocating for particular treatments; generating alternative forms of ‘evidence’ built on a hybrid of personal experience and medical knowledge. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Healthcare practitioners need to engage with new digital forms of content, including online social media. Instead of disregarding sources not considered ‘evidence-based’, practitioners should enhance their understanding of what ‘experiential-evidence’ is deemed significant to patients, particularly in contested areas of healthcare. Elsevier 2013-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3863946/ /pubmed/23830239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.006 Text en © 2013 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Mazanderani, Fadhila
O’Neill, Braden
Powell, John
“People power” or “pester power”? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy()
title “People power” or “pester power”? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy()
title_full “People power” or “pester power”? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy()
title_fullStr “People power” or “pester power”? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy()
title_full_unstemmed “People power” or “pester power”? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy()
title_short “People power” or “pester power”? YouTube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy()
title_sort “people power” or “pester power”? youtube as a forum for the generation of evidence and patient advocacy()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3863946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23830239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.006
work_keys_str_mv AT mazanderanifadhila peoplepowerorpesterpoweryoutubeasaforumforthegenerationofevidenceandpatientadvocacy
AT oneillbraden peoplepowerorpesterpoweryoutubeasaforumforthegenerationofevidenceandpatientadvocacy
AT powelljohn peoplepowerorpesterpoweryoutubeasaforumforthegenerationofevidenceandpatientadvocacy