Cargando…
Functional imaging biomarkers for assessing response to treatment in liver and lung metastases
Management of patients with metastatic cancer and development of new treatments rely on imaging to provide non-invasive biomarkers of tumour response and progression. The widely used size-based criteria have increasingly become inadequate where early measures of response are required to avoid toxici...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
e-Med
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3864224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24334562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0047 |
_version_ | 1782295911273070592 |
---|---|
author | Bernardin, Livia O’Flynn, Elizabeth A.M. deSouza, Nandita M. |
author_facet | Bernardin, Livia O’Flynn, Elizabeth A.M. deSouza, Nandita M. |
author_sort | Bernardin, Livia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Management of patients with metastatic cancer and development of new treatments rely on imaging to provide non-invasive biomarkers of tumour response and progression. The widely used size-based criteria have increasingly become inadequate where early measures of response are required to avoid toxicity of ineffective treatments, as biological, physiologic, and molecular modifications in tumours occur before changes in gross tumour size. A multiparametric approach with the current range of imaging techniques allows functional aspects of tumours to be simultaneously interrogated. Appropriate use of these imaging techniques and their timing in relation to the treatment schedule, particularly in the context of clinical trials, is fundamental. There is a lack of consensus regarding which imaging parameters are most informative for a particular disease site and the best time to image so that, despite an increasing body of literature, open questions on these aspects remain. In addition, standardization of these new parameters is required. This review summarizes the published literature over the last decade on functional and molecular imaging techniques in assessing treatment response in liver and lung metastases. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3864224 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | e-Med |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38642242014-06-13 Functional imaging biomarkers for assessing response to treatment in liver and lung metastases Bernardin, Livia O’Flynn, Elizabeth A.M. deSouza, Nandita M. Cancer Imaging Review Management of patients with metastatic cancer and development of new treatments rely on imaging to provide non-invasive biomarkers of tumour response and progression. The widely used size-based criteria have increasingly become inadequate where early measures of response are required to avoid toxicity of ineffective treatments, as biological, physiologic, and molecular modifications in tumours occur before changes in gross tumour size. A multiparametric approach with the current range of imaging techniques allows functional aspects of tumours to be simultaneously interrogated. Appropriate use of these imaging techniques and their timing in relation to the treatment schedule, particularly in the context of clinical trials, is fundamental. There is a lack of consensus regarding which imaging parameters are most informative for a particular disease site and the best time to image so that, despite an increasing body of literature, open questions on these aspects remain. In addition, standardization of these new parameters is required. This review summarizes the published literature over the last decade on functional and molecular imaging techniques in assessing treatment response in liver and lung metastases. e-Med 2013-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3864224/ /pubmed/24334562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0047 Text en © 2013 International Cancer Imaging Society |
spellingShingle | Review Bernardin, Livia O’Flynn, Elizabeth A.M. deSouza, Nandita M. Functional imaging biomarkers for assessing response to treatment in liver and lung metastases |
title | Functional imaging biomarkers for assessing response to treatment in liver and lung metastases |
title_full | Functional imaging biomarkers for assessing response to treatment in liver and lung metastases |
title_fullStr | Functional imaging biomarkers for assessing response to treatment in liver and lung metastases |
title_full_unstemmed | Functional imaging biomarkers for assessing response to treatment in liver and lung metastases |
title_short | Functional imaging biomarkers for assessing response to treatment in liver and lung metastases |
title_sort | functional imaging biomarkers for assessing response to treatment in liver and lung metastases |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3864224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24334562 http://dx.doi.org/10.1102/1470-7330.2013.0047 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bernardinlivia functionalimagingbiomarkersforassessingresponsetotreatmentinliverandlungmetastases AT oflynnelizabetham functionalimagingbiomarkersforassessingresponsetotreatmentinliverandlungmetastases AT desouzananditam functionalimagingbiomarkersforassessingresponsetotreatmentinliverandlungmetastases |