Cargando…

Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification

Identifying the experimental methods in human neuroimaging papers is important for grouping meaningfully similar experiments for meta-analyses. Currently, this can only be done by human readers. We present the performance of common machine learning (text mining) methods applied to the problem of aut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Turner, Matthew D., Chakrabarti, Chayan, Jones, Thomas B., Xu, Jiawei F., Fox, Peter T., Luger, George F., Laird, Angela R., Turner, Jessica A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3864256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24409112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00240
_version_ 1782295918321598464
author Turner, Matthew D.
Chakrabarti, Chayan
Jones, Thomas B.
Xu, Jiawei F.
Fox, Peter T.
Luger, George F.
Laird, Angela R.
Turner, Jessica A.
author_facet Turner, Matthew D.
Chakrabarti, Chayan
Jones, Thomas B.
Xu, Jiawei F.
Fox, Peter T.
Luger, George F.
Laird, Angela R.
Turner, Jessica A.
author_sort Turner, Matthew D.
collection PubMed
description Identifying the experimental methods in human neuroimaging papers is important for grouping meaningfully similar experiments for meta-analyses. Currently, this can only be done by human readers. We present the performance of common machine learning (text mining) methods applied to the problem of automatically classifying or labeling this literature. Labeling terms are from the Cognitive Paradigm Ontology (CogPO), the text corpora are abstracts of published functional neuroimaging papers, and the methods use the performance of a human expert as training data. We aim to replicate the expert's annotation of multiple labels per abstract identifying the experimental stimuli, cognitive paradigms, response types, and other relevant dimensions of the experiments. We use several standard machine learning methods: naive Bayes (NB), k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machines (specifically SMO or sequential minimal optimization). Exact match performance ranged from only 15% in the worst cases to 78% in the best cases. NB methods combined with binary relevance transformations performed strongly and were robust to overfitting. This collection of results demonstrates what can be achieved with off-the-shelf software components and little to no pre-processing of raw text.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3864256
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38642562014-01-09 Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification Turner, Matthew D. Chakrabarti, Chayan Jones, Thomas B. Xu, Jiawei F. Fox, Peter T. Luger, George F. Laird, Angela R. Turner, Jessica A. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Identifying the experimental methods in human neuroimaging papers is important for grouping meaningfully similar experiments for meta-analyses. Currently, this can only be done by human readers. We present the performance of common machine learning (text mining) methods applied to the problem of automatically classifying or labeling this literature. Labeling terms are from the Cognitive Paradigm Ontology (CogPO), the text corpora are abstracts of published functional neuroimaging papers, and the methods use the performance of a human expert as training data. We aim to replicate the expert's annotation of multiple labels per abstract identifying the experimental stimuli, cognitive paradigms, response types, and other relevant dimensions of the experiments. We use several standard machine learning methods: naive Bayes (NB), k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machines (specifically SMO or sequential minimal optimization). Exact match performance ranged from only 15% in the worst cases to 78% in the best cases. NB methods combined with binary relevance transformations performed strongly and were robust to overfitting. This collection of results demonstrates what can be achieved with off-the-shelf software components and little to no pre-processing of raw text. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3864256/ /pubmed/24409112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00240 Text en Copyright © 2013 Turner, Chakrabarti, Jones, Xu, Fox, Luger, Laird and Turner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Turner, Matthew D.
Chakrabarti, Chayan
Jones, Thomas B.
Xu, Jiawei F.
Fox, Peter T.
Luger, George F.
Laird, Angela R.
Turner, Jessica A.
Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification
title Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification
title_full Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification
title_fullStr Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification
title_full_unstemmed Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification
title_short Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification
title_sort automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3864256/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24409112
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00240
work_keys_str_mv AT turnermatthewd automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification
AT chakrabartichayan automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification
AT jonesthomasb automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification
AT xujiaweif automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification
AT foxpetert automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification
AT lugergeorgef automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification
AT lairdangelar automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification
AT turnerjessicaa automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification