Cargando…
Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification
Identifying the experimental methods in human neuroimaging papers is important for grouping meaningfully similar experiments for meta-analyses. Currently, this can only be done by human readers. We present the performance of common machine learning (text mining) methods applied to the problem of aut...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3864256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24409112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00240 |
_version_ | 1782295918321598464 |
---|---|
author | Turner, Matthew D. Chakrabarti, Chayan Jones, Thomas B. Xu, Jiawei F. Fox, Peter T. Luger, George F. Laird, Angela R. Turner, Jessica A. |
author_facet | Turner, Matthew D. Chakrabarti, Chayan Jones, Thomas B. Xu, Jiawei F. Fox, Peter T. Luger, George F. Laird, Angela R. Turner, Jessica A. |
author_sort | Turner, Matthew D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Identifying the experimental methods in human neuroimaging papers is important for grouping meaningfully similar experiments for meta-analyses. Currently, this can only be done by human readers. We present the performance of common machine learning (text mining) methods applied to the problem of automatically classifying or labeling this literature. Labeling terms are from the Cognitive Paradigm Ontology (CogPO), the text corpora are abstracts of published functional neuroimaging papers, and the methods use the performance of a human expert as training data. We aim to replicate the expert's annotation of multiple labels per abstract identifying the experimental stimuli, cognitive paradigms, response types, and other relevant dimensions of the experiments. We use several standard machine learning methods: naive Bayes (NB), k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machines (specifically SMO or sequential minimal optimization). Exact match performance ranged from only 15% in the worst cases to 78% in the best cases. NB methods combined with binary relevance transformations performed strongly and were robust to overfitting. This collection of results demonstrates what can be achieved with off-the-shelf software components and little to no pre-processing of raw text. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3864256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38642562014-01-09 Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification Turner, Matthew D. Chakrabarti, Chayan Jones, Thomas B. Xu, Jiawei F. Fox, Peter T. Luger, George F. Laird, Angela R. Turner, Jessica A. Front Neurosci Neuroscience Identifying the experimental methods in human neuroimaging papers is important for grouping meaningfully similar experiments for meta-analyses. Currently, this can only be done by human readers. We present the performance of common machine learning (text mining) methods applied to the problem of automatically classifying or labeling this literature. Labeling terms are from the Cognitive Paradigm Ontology (CogPO), the text corpora are abstracts of published functional neuroimaging papers, and the methods use the performance of a human expert as training data. We aim to replicate the expert's annotation of multiple labels per abstract identifying the experimental stimuli, cognitive paradigms, response types, and other relevant dimensions of the experiments. We use several standard machine learning methods: naive Bayes (NB), k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machines (specifically SMO or sequential minimal optimization). Exact match performance ranged from only 15% in the worst cases to 78% in the best cases. NB methods combined with binary relevance transformations performed strongly and were robust to overfitting. This collection of results demonstrates what can be achieved with off-the-shelf software components and little to no pre-processing of raw text. Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3864256/ /pubmed/24409112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00240 Text en Copyright © 2013 Turner, Chakrabarti, Jones, Xu, Fox, Luger, Laird and Turner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Turner, Matthew D. Chakrabarti, Chayan Jones, Thomas B. Xu, Jiawei F. Fox, Peter T. Luger, George F. Laird, Angela R. Turner, Jessica A. Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification |
title | Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification |
title_full | Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification |
title_fullStr | Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification |
title_full_unstemmed | Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification |
title_short | Automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification |
title_sort | automated annotation of functional imaging experiments via multi-label classification |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3864256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24409112 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT turnermatthewd automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification AT chakrabartichayan automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification AT jonesthomasb automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification AT xujiaweif automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification AT foxpetert automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification AT lugergeorgef automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification AT lairdangelar automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification AT turnerjessicaa automatedannotationoffunctionalimagingexperimentsviamultilabelclassification |