Cargando…
Comparison of Protein Immunoprecipitation-Multiple Reaction Monitoring with ELISA for Assay of Biomarker Candidates in Plasma
[Image: see text] Quantitative analysis of protein biomarkers in plasma is typically done by ELISA, but this method is limited by the availability of high-quality antibodies. An alternative approach is protein immunoprecipitation combined with multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (IP-MRM)....
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2013
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3864264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24224610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr400877e |
_version_ | 1782295920151363584 |
---|---|
author | Lin, De Alborn, William E. Slebos, Robbert J. C. Liebler, Daniel C. |
author_facet | Lin, De Alborn, William E. Slebos, Robbert J. C. Liebler, Daniel C. |
author_sort | Lin, De |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Quantitative analysis of protein biomarkers in plasma is typically done by ELISA, but this method is limited by the availability of high-quality antibodies. An alternative approach is protein immunoprecipitation combined with multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (IP-MRM). We compared IP-MRM to ELISA for the analysis of six colon cancer biomarker candidates (metalloproteinase inhibitor 1 (TIMP1), cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), thrombospondin-2 (THBS2), endoglin (ENG), mesothelin (MSLN) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9)) in plasma from colon cancer patients and noncancer controls. Proteins were analyzed by multiplex immunoprecipitation from plasma with the ELISA capture antibodies, further purified by SDS-PAGE, digested and analyzed by stable isotope dilution MRM. IP-MRM provided linear responses (r = 0.978–0.995) between 10 and 640 ng/mL for the target proteins spiked into a “mock plasma” matrix consisting of 60 mg/mL bovine serum albumin. Measurement variation (coefficient of variation at the limit of detection) for IP-MRM assays ranged from 2.3 to 19%, which was similar to variation for ELISAs of the same samples. IP-MRM and ELISA measurements for all target proteins except ENG were highly correlated (r = 0.67–0.97). IP-MRM with high-quality capture antibodies thus provides an effective alternative method to ELISA for protein quantitation in biological fluids. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3864264 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38642642013-12-16 Comparison of Protein Immunoprecipitation-Multiple Reaction Monitoring with ELISA for Assay of Biomarker Candidates in Plasma Lin, De Alborn, William E. Slebos, Robbert J. C. Liebler, Daniel C. J Proteome Res [Image: see text] Quantitative analysis of protein biomarkers in plasma is typically done by ELISA, but this method is limited by the availability of high-quality antibodies. An alternative approach is protein immunoprecipitation combined with multiple reaction monitoring mass spectrometry (IP-MRM). We compared IP-MRM to ELISA for the analysis of six colon cancer biomarker candidates (metalloproteinase inhibitor 1 (TIMP1), cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP), thrombospondin-2 (THBS2), endoglin (ENG), mesothelin (MSLN) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9)) in plasma from colon cancer patients and noncancer controls. Proteins were analyzed by multiplex immunoprecipitation from plasma with the ELISA capture antibodies, further purified by SDS-PAGE, digested and analyzed by stable isotope dilution MRM. IP-MRM provided linear responses (r = 0.978–0.995) between 10 and 640 ng/mL for the target proteins spiked into a “mock plasma” matrix consisting of 60 mg/mL bovine serum albumin. Measurement variation (coefficient of variation at the limit of detection) for IP-MRM assays ranged from 2.3 to 19%, which was similar to variation for ELISAs of the same samples. IP-MRM and ELISA measurements for all target proteins except ENG were highly correlated (r = 0.67–0.97). IP-MRM with high-quality capture antibodies thus provides an effective alternative method to ELISA for protein quantitation in biological fluids. American Chemical Society 2013-11-13 2013-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3864264/ /pubmed/24224610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr400877e Text en Copyright © 2013 American Chemical Society Terms of Use (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_termsofuse.html) |
spellingShingle | Lin, De Alborn, William E. Slebos, Robbert J. C. Liebler, Daniel C. Comparison of Protein Immunoprecipitation-Multiple Reaction Monitoring with ELISA for Assay of Biomarker Candidates in Plasma |
title | Comparison of Protein Immunoprecipitation-Multiple
Reaction Monitoring with ELISA for Assay of Biomarker Candidates in
Plasma |
title_full | Comparison of Protein Immunoprecipitation-Multiple
Reaction Monitoring with ELISA for Assay of Biomarker Candidates in
Plasma |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Protein Immunoprecipitation-Multiple
Reaction Monitoring with ELISA for Assay of Biomarker Candidates in
Plasma |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Protein Immunoprecipitation-Multiple
Reaction Monitoring with ELISA for Assay of Biomarker Candidates in
Plasma |
title_short | Comparison of Protein Immunoprecipitation-Multiple
Reaction Monitoring with ELISA for Assay of Biomarker Candidates in
Plasma |
title_sort | comparison of protein immunoprecipitation-multiple
reaction monitoring with elisa for assay of biomarker candidates in
plasma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3864264/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24224610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/pr400877e |
work_keys_str_mv | AT linde comparisonofproteinimmunoprecipitationmultiplereactionmonitoringwithelisaforassayofbiomarkercandidatesinplasma AT albornwilliame comparisonofproteinimmunoprecipitationmultiplereactionmonitoringwithelisaforassayofbiomarkercandidatesinplasma AT slebosrobbertjc comparisonofproteinimmunoprecipitationmultiplereactionmonitoringwithelisaforassayofbiomarkercandidatesinplasma AT lieblerdanielc comparisonofproteinimmunoprecipitationmultiplereactionmonitoringwithelisaforassayofbiomarkercandidatesinplasma |