Cargando…

Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty with Preservation of Posterior Structures

Objective To demonstrate that preservation of all posterior structures during open-door laminoplasty (ODL) is associated with a significant preservation of motion. Methods Fifteen patients underwent cervical ODL by one surgeon for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. An open-door technique...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdullah, Kalil G., Yamashita, Takayuki, Steinmetz, Michael P., Lubelski, Daniel, Wang, Jeffrey C., Benzel, Edward C., Mroz, Thomas E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3864484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24353941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1307258
_version_ 1782295940086890496
author Abdullah, Kalil G.
Yamashita, Takayuki
Steinmetz, Michael P.
Lubelski, Daniel
Wang, Jeffrey C.
Benzel, Edward C.
Mroz, Thomas E.
author_facet Abdullah, Kalil G.
Yamashita, Takayuki
Steinmetz, Michael P.
Lubelski, Daniel
Wang, Jeffrey C.
Benzel, Edward C.
Mroz, Thomas E.
author_sort Abdullah, Kalil G.
collection PubMed
description Objective To demonstrate that preservation of all posterior structures during open-door laminoplasty (ODL) is associated with a significant preservation of motion. Methods Fifteen patients underwent cervical ODL by one surgeon for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. An open-door technique was employed, and the laminae on the open side were reconstructed using miniplates with allograft strut bone graft. All spinous processes and interspinous and supraspinous ligaments were preserved within the operative levels and between supra- and subjacent levels in all patients. Postoperative radiographs were obtained 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months. Computed tomography scans were obtained at 12 months. Results There were no significant intraoperative or perioperative complications. Postoperatively, the neutral angle was 6.8 ± 11.5 degrees (95% confidence interval: 0.5 to 13.1), representing a loss of lordosis of 3 degrees (not significant). The difference between the preoperative and postoperative arc range of motion was 5.96 ± 11.9 degrees (confidence interval: −0.62 to 12.5). The average percent loss of motion was 3.5% ± (0.1 to 6.9%). Four patients had an increased range of motion postoperatively. Conclusion Open-door laminoplasty with preservation of all posterior structures provides greater preservation of motion than has been previously described.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3864484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38644842013-12-18 Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty with Preservation of Posterior Structures Abdullah, Kalil G. Yamashita, Takayuki Steinmetz, Michael P. Lubelski, Daniel Wang, Jeffrey C. Benzel, Edward C. Mroz, Thomas E. Global Spine J Article Objective To demonstrate that preservation of all posterior structures during open-door laminoplasty (ODL) is associated with a significant preservation of motion. Methods Fifteen patients underwent cervical ODL by one surgeon for treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. An open-door technique was employed, and the laminae on the open side were reconstructed using miniplates with allograft strut bone graft. All spinous processes and interspinous and supraspinous ligaments were preserved within the operative levels and between supra- and subjacent levels in all patients. Postoperative radiographs were obtained 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months. Computed tomography scans were obtained at 12 months. Results There were no significant intraoperative or perioperative complications. Postoperatively, the neutral angle was 6.8 ± 11.5 degrees (95% confidence interval: 0.5 to 13.1), representing a loss of lordosis of 3 degrees (not significant). The difference between the preoperative and postoperative arc range of motion was 5.96 ± 11.9 degrees (confidence interval: −0.62 to 12.5). The average percent loss of motion was 3.5% ± (0.1 to 6.9%). Four patients had an increased range of motion postoperatively. Conclusion Open-door laminoplasty with preservation of all posterior structures provides greater preservation of motion than has been previously described. Thieme Medical Publishers 2012-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3864484/ /pubmed/24353941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1307258 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Abdullah, Kalil G.
Yamashita, Takayuki
Steinmetz, Michael P.
Lubelski, Daniel
Wang, Jeffrey C.
Benzel, Edward C.
Mroz, Thomas E.
Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty with Preservation of Posterior Structures
title Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty with Preservation of Posterior Structures
title_full Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty with Preservation of Posterior Structures
title_fullStr Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty with Preservation of Posterior Structures
title_full_unstemmed Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty with Preservation of Posterior Structures
title_short Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty with Preservation of Posterior Structures
title_sort open-door cervical laminoplasty with preservation of posterior structures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3864484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24353941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1307258
work_keys_str_mv AT abdullahkalilg opendoorcervicallaminoplastywithpreservationofposteriorstructures
AT yamashitatakayuki opendoorcervicallaminoplastywithpreservationofposteriorstructures
AT steinmetzmichaelp opendoorcervicallaminoplastywithpreservationofposteriorstructures
AT lubelskidaniel opendoorcervicallaminoplastywithpreservationofposteriorstructures
AT wangjeffreyc opendoorcervicallaminoplastywithpreservationofposteriorstructures
AT benzeledwardc opendoorcervicallaminoplastywithpreservationofposteriorstructures
AT mrozthomase opendoorcervicallaminoplastywithpreservationofposteriorstructures