Cargando…

The Incidence of Bifid C7 Spinous Processes

For posterior cervical surgery, if the operation only involves the lower cervical area, counting from C2 is impractical and the level may not be visible on X-rays. In such cases, we usually place a marker at the top of the incision and also rely on the size and monofid shape of the C7 spinous proces...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Woojin, Maeda, Takeshi, Park, Yung, Buchowski, Jacob M., Nabb, Colin E., Riew, Dan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishers 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3864495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24353954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1319776
_version_ 1782295940759027712
author Cho, Woojin
Maeda, Takeshi
Park, Yung
Buchowski, Jacob M.
Nabb, Colin E.
Riew, Dan
author_facet Cho, Woojin
Maeda, Takeshi
Park, Yung
Buchowski, Jacob M.
Nabb, Colin E.
Riew, Dan
author_sort Cho, Woojin
collection PubMed
description For posterior cervical surgery, if the operation only involves the lower cervical area, counting from C2 is impractical and the level may not be visible on X-rays. In such cases, we usually place a marker at the top of the incision and also rely on the size and monofid shape of the C7 spinous process. Relying on the C7 morphology, however, we initially instrumented the wrong levels in a case where the patient had a bifid C7 spinous process. We therefore sought to determine the frequency of bifid cervicothoracic spinous processes. Computed tomography axial images of C6, C7, and T1 from 516 patients were evaluated. The spinous processes were classified into three categories: “bifid,” “partially bifid,” and “monofid.” C6 spinous process was monofid in 47.9% of cases, partially bifid in 4.2% of cases, and bifid in 47.9% of cases. C7 spinous process was monofid in 99.2% of cases, partially bifid in 0.5% of cases, and bifid in 0.3% of cases. T1 was monofid in all cases. A truly bifid C7 spinous process occurs 0.3% of the time and therefore is not a reliable landmark for choosing fusion levels. This knowledge hopefully helps prevent the type of wrong-level instrumentation that we performed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3864495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Thieme Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38644952013-12-18 The Incidence of Bifid C7 Spinous Processes Cho, Woojin Maeda, Takeshi Park, Yung Buchowski, Jacob M. Nabb, Colin E. Riew, Dan Global Spine J Article For posterior cervical surgery, if the operation only involves the lower cervical area, counting from C2 is impractical and the level may not be visible on X-rays. In such cases, we usually place a marker at the top of the incision and also rely on the size and monofid shape of the C7 spinous process. Relying on the C7 morphology, however, we initially instrumented the wrong levels in a case where the patient had a bifid C7 spinous process. We therefore sought to determine the frequency of bifid cervicothoracic spinous processes. Computed tomography axial images of C6, C7, and T1 from 516 patients were evaluated. The spinous processes were classified into three categories: “bifid,” “partially bifid,” and “monofid.” C6 spinous process was monofid in 47.9% of cases, partially bifid in 4.2% of cases, and bifid in 47.9% of cases. C7 spinous process was monofid in 99.2% of cases, partially bifid in 0.5% of cases, and bifid in 0.3% of cases. T1 was monofid in all cases. A truly bifid C7 spinous process occurs 0.3% of the time and therefore is not a reliable landmark for choosing fusion levels. This knowledge hopefully helps prevent the type of wrong-level instrumentation that we performed. Thieme Medical Publishers 2012-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3864495/ /pubmed/24353954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1319776 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers
spellingShingle Article
Cho, Woojin
Maeda, Takeshi
Park, Yung
Buchowski, Jacob M.
Nabb, Colin E.
Riew, Dan
The Incidence of Bifid C7 Spinous Processes
title The Incidence of Bifid C7 Spinous Processes
title_full The Incidence of Bifid C7 Spinous Processes
title_fullStr The Incidence of Bifid C7 Spinous Processes
title_full_unstemmed The Incidence of Bifid C7 Spinous Processes
title_short The Incidence of Bifid C7 Spinous Processes
title_sort incidence of bifid c7 spinous processes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3864495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24353954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1319776
work_keys_str_mv AT chowoojin theincidenceofbifidc7spinousprocesses
AT maedatakeshi theincidenceofbifidc7spinousprocesses
AT parkyung theincidenceofbifidc7spinousprocesses
AT buchowskijacobm theincidenceofbifidc7spinousprocesses
AT nabbcoline theincidenceofbifidc7spinousprocesses
AT riewdan theincidenceofbifidc7spinousprocesses
AT chowoojin incidenceofbifidc7spinousprocesses
AT maedatakeshi incidenceofbifidc7spinousprocesses
AT parkyung incidenceofbifidc7spinousprocesses
AT buchowskijacobm incidenceofbifidc7spinousprocesses
AT nabbcoline incidenceofbifidc7spinousprocesses
AT riewdan incidenceofbifidc7spinousprocesses