Cargando…
A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Expert Opinion Document
The European Union (EU) Council Recommendation on rare diseases urged the member states to implement national and EU collaborative actions to improve the health care of rare disease patients. Following this recommendation, the European Commission launched a tender on newborn screening (NBS) to repor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3865414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23652378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2013.90 |
_version_ | 1782296034125283328 |
---|---|
author | Cornel, Martina C Rigter, Tessel Weinreich, Stephanie S Burgard, Peter Hoffmann, Georg F Lindner, Martin Gerard Loeber, J Rupp, Kathrin Taruscio, Domenica Vittozzi, Luciano |
author_facet | Cornel, Martina C Rigter, Tessel Weinreich, Stephanie S Burgard, Peter Hoffmann, Georg F Lindner, Martin Gerard Loeber, J Rupp, Kathrin Taruscio, Domenica Vittozzi, Luciano |
author_sort | Cornel, Martina C |
collection | PubMed |
description | The European Union (EU) Council Recommendation on rare diseases urged the member states to implement national and EU collaborative actions to improve the health care of rare disease patients. Following this recommendation, the European Commission launched a tender on newborn screening (NBS) to report on current practices of laboratory testing, form a network of experts and provide guidance on how to further implement NBS screening in a responsible way, the latter of which was provided in an Expert Opinion document. After consultation of experts from EU member states, (potential) candidate member states and European Free Trade Association countries, in a consensus meeting in June 2011, 70 expert opinions were finalized. They included the need to develop case definitions for all disorders screened for to facilitate assessment and international outcome studies. Decision whether a screening program should be performed can be based on screening criteria updated from the traditional Wilson and Jungner (1968) criteria, relating to disease, treatment, test and cost. The interest of the child should be central in the assessment of pros and cons. A European NBS body should assess evidence on (new) screening candidate disorders. For rare conditions, best level evidence should be used. The health system should ensure treatment to cases diagnosed by screening, controlled and revised by follow-up outcome studies. Screening methodology should aim to avoid unintended findings, such as mild forms and carrier status information, as much as possible. Activities to improve NBS in Europe, such as training and scientific evaluation, could benefit from collaboration at EU level and beyond. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3865414 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38654142014-01-01 A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Expert Opinion Document Cornel, Martina C Rigter, Tessel Weinreich, Stephanie S Burgard, Peter Hoffmann, Georg F Lindner, Martin Gerard Loeber, J Rupp, Kathrin Taruscio, Domenica Vittozzi, Luciano Eur J Hum Genet Policy The European Union (EU) Council Recommendation on rare diseases urged the member states to implement national and EU collaborative actions to improve the health care of rare disease patients. Following this recommendation, the European Commission launched a tender on newborn screening (NBS) to report on current practices of laboratory testing, form a network of experts and provide guidance on how to further implement NBS screening in a responsible way, the latter of which was provided in an Expert Opinion document. After consultation of experts from EU member states, (potential) candidate member states and European Free Trade Association countries, in a consensus meeting in June 2011, 70 expert opinions were finalized. They included the need to develop case definitions for all disorders screened for to facilitate assessment and international outcome studies. Decision whether a screening program should be performed can be based on screening criteria updated from the traditional Wilson and Jungner (1968) criteria, relating to disease, treatment, test and cost. The interest of the child should be central in the assessment of pros and cons. A European NBS body should assess evidence on (new) screening candidate disorders. For rare conditions, best level evidence should be used. The health system should ensure treatment to cases diagnosed by screening, controlled and revised by follow-up outcome studies. Screening methodology should aim to avoid unintended findings, such as mild forms and carrier status information, as much as possible. Activities to improve NBS in Europe, such as training and scientific evaluation, could benefit from collaboration at EU level and beyond. Nature Publishing Group 2014-01 2013-05-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3865414/ /pubmed/23652378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2013.90 Text en Copyright © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Policy Cornel, Martina C Rigter, Tessel Weinreich, Stephanie S Burgard, Peter Hoffmann, Georg F Lindner, Martin Gerard Loeber, J Rupp, Kathrin Taruscio, Domenica Vittozzi, Luciano A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Expert Opinion Document |
title | A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Expert Opinion Document |
title_full | A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Expert Opinion Document |
title_fullStr | A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Expert Opinion Document |
title_full_unstemmed | A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Expert Opinion Document |
title_short | A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Expert Opinion Document |
title_sort | framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the eu: an expert opinion document |
topic | Policy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3865414/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23652378 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2013.90 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cornelmartinac aframeworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT rigtertessel aframeworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT weinreichstephanies aframeworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT burgardpeter aframeworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT hoffmanngeorgf aframeworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT lindnermartin aframeworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT gerardloeberj aframeworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT ruppkathrin aframeworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT tarusciodomenica aframeworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT vittozziluciano aframeworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT cornelmartinac frameworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT rigtertessel frameworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT weinreichstephanies frameworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT burgardpeter frameworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT hoffmanngeorgf frameworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT lindnermartin frameworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT gerardloeberj frameworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT ruppkathrin frameworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT tarusciodomenica frameworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument AT vittozziluciano frameworktostartthedebateonneonatalscreeningpoliciesintheeuanexpertopiniondocument |