Cargando…
A ‘Textbook Pattern’? Malaria Control and Eradication in Jamaica, 1910–65
In 1965 Jamaica was declared free of malaria by the World Health Organisation (WHO), thus ending centuries of death and suffering from the disease. This declaration followed the successful completion of the WHO’s Malaria Eradication Programme (MEP) on the island, initiated in 1958. This account firs...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3865946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2013.20 |
_version_ | 1782296087981195264 |
---|---|
author | Jones, Margaret |
author_facet | Jones, Margaret |
author_sort | Jones, Margaret |
collection | PubMed |
description | In 1965 Jamaica was declared free of malaria by the World Health Organisation (WHO), thus ending centuries of death and suffering from the disease. This declaration followed the successful completion of the WHO’s Malaria Eradication Programme (MEP) on the island, initiated in 1958. This account first explores the antecedent control measures adopted by the government up to the MEP. These, as advocated by the previous malaria ‘experts’ who had reported on the disease on the island concentrated on controlling the vector and the administration of quinine for individual protection. Although Jamaica suffered no catastrophic epidemics of island-wide scope, malaria was a constant cause of mortality and morbidity. Major change came in the wake of the Second World War within the changing political context of national independence and international development. In 1957 the Jamaican government joined the global WHO programme to eradicate malaria. The Jamaican campaign exposes many of the problems noted in other studies of such top–down initiatives in their lack of attention to the particular circumstances of each case. Despite being described as ‘a textbook pattern’ of malaria eradication, the MEP in Jamaica suffered from a lack of sufficient preparation and field knowledge. This is most obviously illustrated by the fact that all literature on the programme sent to Jamaica in the first two years was in Spanish. That the MEP exploited the technological opportunity provided by dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) with advantage in Jamaica is not disputed but as this analysis illustrates this success was by no means guaranteed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3865946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38659462013-12-17 A ‘Textbook Pattern’? Malaria Control and Eradication in Jamaica, 1910–65 Jones, Margaret Med Hist Articles In 1965 Jamaica was declared free of malaria by the World Health Organisation (WHO), thus ending centuries of death and suffering from the disease. This declaration followed the successful completion of the WHO’s Malaria Eradication Programme (MEP) on the island, initiated in 1958. This account first explores the antecedent control measures adopted by the government up to the MEP. These, as advocated by the previous malaria ‘experts’ who had reported on the disease on the island concentrated on controlling the vector and the administration of quinine for individual protection. Although Jamaica suffered no catastrophic epidemics of island-wide scope, malaria was a constant cause of mortality and morbidity. Major change came in the wake of the Second World War within the changing political context of national independence and international development. In 1957 the Jamaican government joined the global WHO programme to eradicate malaria. The Jamaican campaign exposes many of the problems noted in other studies of such top–down initiatives in their lack of attention to the particular circumstances of each case. Despite being described as ‘a textbook pattern’ of malaria eradication, the MEP in Jamaica suffered from a lack of sufficient preparation and field knowledge. This is most obviously illustrated by the fact that all literature on the programme sent to Jamaica in the first two years was in Spanish. That the MEP exploited the technological opportunity provided by dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) with advantage in Jamaica is not disputed but as this analysis illustrates this success was by no means guaranteed. Cambridge University Press 2013-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3865946/ /pubmed/24069886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2013.20 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution licence <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Articles Jones, Margaret A ‘Textbook Pattern’? Malaria Control and Eradication in Jamaica, 1910–65 |
title | A ‘Textbook Pattern’? Malaria Control and Eradication in Jamaica, 1910–65 |
title_full | A ‘Textbook Pattern’? Malaria Control and Eradication in Jamaica, 1910–65 |
title_fullStr | A ‘Textbook Pattern’? Malaria Control and Eradication in Jamaica, 1910–65 |
title_full_unstemmed | A ‘Textbook Pattern’? Malaria Control and Eradication in Jamaica, 1910–65 |
title_short | A ‘Textbook Pattern’? Malaria Control and Eradication in Jamaica, 1910–65 |
title_sort | ‘textbook pattern’? malaria control and eradication in jamaica, 1910–65 |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3865946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24069886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/mdh.2013.20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonesmargaret atextbookpatternmalariacontrolanderadicationinjamaica191065 AT jonesmargaret textbookpatternmalariacontrolanderadicationinjamaica191065 |