Cargando…

Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac (SI) joint pain is an often overlooked cause of low back pain. SI joint arthrodesis has been reported to relieve pain and improve quality of life in patients suffering from degeneration or disruption of the SI joint who have failed non-surgical care. We report herein early res...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duhon, Bradley S, Cher, Daniel J, Wine, Kathryn D, Lockstadt, Harry, Kovalsky, Don, Soo, Cheng-Lun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3865972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24363562
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S55197
_version_ 1782296093883629568
author Duhon, Bradley S
Cher, Daniel J
Wine, Kathryn D
Lockstadt, Harry
Kovalsky, Don
Soo, Cheng-Lun
author_facet Duhon, Bradley S
Cher, Daniel J
Wine, Kathryn D
Lockstadt, Harry
Kovalsky, Don
Soo, Cheng-Lun
author_sort Duhon, Bradley S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac (SI) joint pain is an often overlooked cause of low back pain. SI joint arthrodesis has been reported to relieve pain and improve quality of life in patients suffering from degeneration or disruption of the SI joint who have failed non-surgical care. We report herein early results of a multicenter prospective single-arm cohort of patients with SI joint degeneration or disruption who underwent minimally invasive fusion using the iFuse Implant System®. METHODS: The safety cohort includes 94 subjects at 23 sites with chronic SI joint pain who met study eligibility criteria and underwent minimally invasive SI joint fusion with the iFuse Implant System® between August 2012 and September 2013. Subjects underwent structured assessments preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, including SI joint and back pain visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D). Patient satisfaction with surgery was assessed at 6 months. The effectiveness cohort includes the 32 subjects who have had 6-month follow-up to date. RESULTS: Mean subject age was 51 years (n=94, safety cohort) and 66% of patients were women. Subjects were highly debilitated at baseline (mean VAS pain score 78, mean ODI score 54). Three implants were used in 80% of patients; two patients underwent staged bilateral implants. Twenty-three adverse events occurred within 1 month of surgery and 29 additional events occurred between 30 days and latest follow-up. Six adverse events were severe but none were device-related. Complete 6-month postoperative follow-up was available in 26 subjects. In the effectiveness cohort, mean (± standard deviation) SI joint pain improved from a baseline score of 76 (±16.2) to a 6-month score of 29.3 (±23.3, an improvement of 49 points, P<0.0001), mean ODI improved from 55.3 (±10.7) to 38.9 (±18.5, an improvement of 15.8 points, P<0.0001) and SF-36 PCS improved from 30.7 (±4.3) to 37.0 (±10.7, an improvement of 6.7 points, P=0.003). Ninety percent of subjects who were ambulatory at baseline regained full ambulation by month 6; median time to full ambulation was 30 days. Satisfaction with the procedure was high at 85%. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive SI joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System® is safe. Mid-term follow-up indicates a high rate of improvement in pain and function with high rates of patient satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3865972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38659722013-12-20 Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study Duhon, Bradley S Cher, Daniel J Wine, Kathryn D Lockstadt, Harry Kovalsky, Don Soo, Cheng-Lun Med Devices (Auckl) Original Research BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac (SI) joint pain is an often overlooked cause of low back pain. SI joint arthrodesis has been reported to relieve pain and improve quality of life in patients suffering from degeneration or disruption of the SI joint who have failed non-surgical care. We report herein early results of a multicenter prospective single-arm cohort of patients with SI joint degeneration or disruption who underwent minimally invasive fusion using the iFuse Implant System®. METHODS: The safety cohort includes 94 subjects at 23 sites with chronic SI joint pain who met study eligibility criteria and underwent minimally invasive SI joint fusion with the iFuse Implant System® between August 2012 and September 2013. Subjects underwent structured assessments preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively, including SI joint and back pain visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form-36 (SF-36), and EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D). Patient satisfaction with surgery was assessed at 6 months. The effectiveness cohort includes the 32 subjects who have had 6-month follow-up to date. RESULTS: Mean subject age was 51 years (n=94, safety cohort) and 66% of patients were women. Subjects were highly debilitated at baseline (mean VAS pain score 78, mean ODI score 54). Three implants were used in 80% of patients; two patients underwent staged bilateral implants. Twenty-three adverse events occurred within 1 month of surgery and 29 additional events occurred between 30 days and latest follow-up. Six adverse events were severe but none were device-related. Complete 6-month postoperative follow-up was available in 26 subjects. In the effectiveness cohort, mean (± standard deviation) SI joint pain improved from a baseline score of 76 (±16.2) to a 6-month score of 29.3 (±23.3, an improvement of 49 points, P<0.0001), mean ODI improved from 55.3 (±10.7) to 38.9 (±18.5, an improvement of 15.8 points, P<0.0001) and SF-36 PCS improved from 30.7 (±4.3) to 37.0 (±10.7, an improvement of 6.7 points, P=0.003). Ninety percent of subjects who were ambulatory at baseline regained full ambulation by month 6; median time to full ambulation was 30 days. Satisfaction with the procedure was high at 85%. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive SI joint fusion using the iFuse Implant System® is safe. Mid-term follow-up indicates a high rate of improvement in pain and function with high rates of patient satisfaction. Dove Medical Press 2013-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3865972/ /pubmed/24363562 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S55197 Text en © 2013 Duhon et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Duhon, Bradley S
Cher, Daniel J
Wine, Kathryn D
Lockstadt, Harry
Kovalsky, Don
Soo, Cheng-Lun
Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study
title Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study
title_full Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study
title_fullStr Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study
title_short Safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study
title_sort safety and 6-month effectiveness of minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion: a prospective study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3865972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24363562
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S55197
work_keys_str_mv AT duhonbradleys safetyand6montheffectivenessofminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionaprospectivestudy
AT cherdanielj safetyand6montheffectivenessofminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionaprospectivestudy
AT winekathrynd safetyand6montheffectivenessofminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionaprospectivestudy
AT lockstadtharry safetyand6montheffectivenessofminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionaprospectivestudy
AT kovalskydon safetyand6montheffectivenessofminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionaprospectivestudy
AT soochenglun safetyand6montheffectivenessofminimallyinvasivesacroiliacjointfusionaprospectivestudy