Cargando…

Posterior Reconstruction and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a High-Risk Setting

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To detail the technique and evaluate the impact of a personal modified posterior reconstruction technique (PDR) on the outcomes of extrafascial laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (eLRP) in a consecutive series of 52 patients affected by high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa). M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anceschi, U., Gaffi, M., Molinari, C., Anceschi, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3866056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24398194
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13794522666365
_version_ 1782296100781162496
author Anceschi, U.
Gaffi, M.
Molinari, C.
Anceschi, C.
author_facet Anceschi, U.
Gaffi, M.
Molinari, C.
Anceschi, C.
author_sort Anceschi, U.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To detail the technique and evaluate the impact of a personal modified posterior reconstruction technique (PDR) on the outcomes of extrafascial laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (eLRP) in a consecutive series of 52 patients affected by high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa). METHODS: From October 2007 to March 2012, 52 patients underwent PDR during eLRP for HRPCa. Fifty-four patients who underwent eLRP for HRPCa with no PDR were considered as historical controls. Mean operative time (MOT), mean catheterization time (MCT), % continence and quality of life (QoL) at a scheduled follow-up, % anastomotic leakage, % adjuvant therapy were compared between the groups. Percentage of continence and QoL were prospectively assessed by self-administered validated questionnaires (ICI-Q-SF; SF-36) at 1, 3, 6, and12 months. RESULTS: PDR was associated wither higher continence rates at 1 and 3 mo (P = .028, P = .006), a lower incidence of cystographic leakage (P = .002), and an increased adjuvant radiotherapy rate (P = .008). At 1- and 3-mo interval, in the PDR group, we found a higher number of patients reporting better general health, (P = .01, P = .03) reduced role limitations due to physical health, (P = .02, P = .001), and emotional problems (P = .001, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: PDR is associated with a lower degree of anastomotic leakage, and it significantly enhances urinary continence at 1 and 3 mo. The increased adjuvant radiotherapy rate and quality of life after surgery observed with our technique suggest that in the high-risk setting an early functional recovery may substantially influence the oncologic outcome of eLRP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3866056
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38660562013-12-18 Posterior Reconstruction and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a High-Risk Setting Anceschi, U. Gaffi, M. Molinari, C. Anceschi, C. JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To detail the technique and evaluate the impact of a personal modified posterior reconstruction technique (PDR) on the outcomes of extrafascial laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (eLRP) in a consecutive series of 52 patients affected by high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa). METHODS: From October 2007 to March 2012, 52 patients underwent PDR during eLRP for HRPCa. Fifty-four patients who underwent eLRP for HRPCa with no PDR were considered as historical controls. Mean operative time (MOT), mean catheterization time (MCT), % continence and quality of life (QoL) at a scheduled follow-up, % anastomotic leakage, % adjuvant therapy were compared between the groups. Percentage of continence and QoL were prospectively assessed by self-administered validated questionnaires (ICI-Q-SF; SF-36) at 1, 3, 6, and12 months. RESULTS: PDR was associated wither higher continence rates at 1 and 3 mo (P = .028, P = .006), a lower incidence of cystographic leakage (P = .002), and an increased adjuvant radiotherapy rate (P = .008). At 1- and 3-mo interval, in the PDR group, we found a higher number of patients reporting better general health, (P = .01, P = .03) reduced role limitations due to physical health, (P = .02, P = .001), and emotional problems (P = .001, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: PDR is associated with a lower degree of anastomotic leakage, and it significantly enhances urinary continence at 1 and 3 mo. The increased adjuvant radiotherapy rate and quality of life after surgery observed with our technique suggest that in the high-risk setting an early functional recovery may substantially influence the oncologic outcome of eLRP. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3866056/ /pubmed/24398194 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13794522666365 Text en © 2013 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Anceschi, U.
Gaffi, M.
Molinari, C.
Anceschi, C.
Posterior Reconstruction and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a High-Risk Setting
title Posterior Reconstruction and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a High-Risk Setting
title_full Posterior Reconstruction and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a High-Risk Setting
title_fullStr Posterior Reconstruction and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a High-Risk Setting
title_full_unstemmed Posterior Reconstruction and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a High-Risk Setting
title_short Posterior Reconstruction and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in a High-Risk Setting
title_sort posterior reconstruction and outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a high-risk setting
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3866056/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24398194
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13794522666365
work_keys_str_mv AT anceschiu posteriorreconstructionandoutcomesoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyinahighrisksetting
AT gaffim posteriorreconstructionandoutcomesoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyinahighrisksetting
AT molinaric posteriorreconstructionandoutcomesoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyinahighrisksetting
AT anceschic posteriorreconstructionandoutcomesoflaparoscopicradicalprostatectomyinahighrisksetting