Cargando…

Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy

BACKGROUND: A robotic-assisted minimal invasive approach has the potential to overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopic pancreatectomies. We analyzed the outcomes of robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomies (RDPs) to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of robotic distal pancreas resec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suman, Paritosh, Rutledge, John, Yiengpruksawan, Anusak
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3866069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24398207
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13794522667409
_version_ 1782296103758069760
author Suman, Paritosh
Rutledge, John
Yiengpruksawan, Anusak
author_facet Suman, Paritosh
Rutledge, John
Yiengpruksawan, Anusak
author_sort Suman, Paritosh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A robotic-assisted minimal invasive approach has the potential to overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopic pancreatectomies. We analyzed the outcomes of robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomies (RDPs) to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of robotic distal pancreas resection, including spleen preservation. METHODS: We performed a descriptive retrospective analysis of 40 RDPs. Statistical comparisons were performed between two groups of patients undergoing robotic-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (SDP). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of 49 attempted RDPs, 40 were completed with robotic assistance, with a conversion rate of 18.4%. Compared with the published reports of laparoscopic distal pancreatotomy (DP) and robotic DP, the spleen preservation rate (30%), operating time (203 minutes), major complications rate (5%), fistula rate (20%), and length of hospital stay (5 days) were similar in our RDP patients. Also, the perioperative outcomes of the SPDP and SDP groups did not differ significantly. The median survival was 12.5 months for the patients undergoing RDP for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy, with or without splenic preservation, can be safely performed for lesions of the distal pancreas, with appropriate indications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3866069
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38660692013-12-18 Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Suman, Paritosh Rutledge, John Yiengpruksawan, Anusak JSLS Scientific Papers BACKGROUND: A robotic-assisted minimal invasive approach has the potential to overcome the limitations of conventional laparoscopic pancreatectomies. We analyzed the outcomes of robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomies (RDPs) to demonstrate the safety and feasibility of robotic distal pancreas resection, including spleen preservation. METHODS: We performed a descriptive retrospective analysis of 40 RDPs. Statistical comparisons were performed between two groups of patients undergoing robotic-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy (SDP). Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of 49 attempted RDPs, 40 were completed with robotic assistance, with a conversion rate of 18.4%. Compared with the published reports of laparoscopic distal pancreatotomy (DP) and robotic DP, the spleen preservation rate (30%), operating time (203 minutes), major complications rate (5%), fistula rate (20%), and length of hospital stay (5 days) were similar in our RDP patients. Also, the perioperative outcomes of the SPDP and SDP groups did not differ significantly. The median survival was 12.5 months for the patients undergoing RDP for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy, with or without splenic preservation, can be safely performed for lesions of the distal pancreas, with appropriate indications. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3866069/ /pubmed/24398207 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13794522667409 Text en © 2013 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way.
spellingShingle Scientific Papers
Suman, Paritosh
Rutledge, John
Yiengpruksawan, Anusak
Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy
title Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy
title_full Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy
title_fullStr Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy
title_short Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy
title_sort robotic distal pancreatectomy
topic Scientific Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3866069/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24398207
http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13794522667409
work_keys_str_mv AT sumanparitosh roboticdistalpancreatectomy
AT rutledgejohn roboticdistalpancreatectomy
AT yiengpruksawananusak roboticdistalpancreatectomy