Cargando…
Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review
BACKGROUND: Surrogate outcomes are a significant challenge in drug evaluation for health technology assessment (HTA) agencies. The research objectives were to: identify factors associated with surrogate use and acceptability in Canada’s Common Drug Review (CDR) recommendations, and compare the CDR w...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3866929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24341379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-11-31 |
_version_ | 1782296243620282368 |
---|---|
author | Rocchi, Angela Khoudigian, Shoghag Hopkins, Rob Goeree, Ron |
author_facet | Rocchi, Angela Khoudigian, Shoghag Hopkins, Rob Goeree, Ron |
author_sort | Rocchi, Angela |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Surrogate outcomes are a significant challenge in drug evaluation for health technology assessment (HTA) agencies. The research objectives were to: identify factors associated with surrogate use and acceptability in Canada’s Common Drug Review (CDR) recommendations, and compare the CDR with other HTA or regulatory agencies regarding surrogate concerns. METHODS: Final recommendations were identified from CDR inception (September 2003) to December 31, 2010. Recommendations were classified by type of outcome (surrogate, final, other) and acceptability of surrogates (determined by the presence/absence of statements of concern regarding surrogates). Descriptive and statistical analyses examined factors related to surrogate use and acceptability. For thirteen surrogate-based submissions, recommendations from international HTA and regulatory agencies were reviewed for statements about surrogate acceptability. RESULTS: Of 156 final recommendations, 68 (44%) involved surrogates. The overall ‘do not list’ (DNL) rate was 48%; the DNL rate for surrogates was 41% (p = 0.175). The DNL rate was 64% for non-accepted surrogates (n = 28) versus 25% for accepted surrogates (odds ratio 5.4, p = 0.002). Clinical uncertainty, use of economic evidence over price alone, and a premium price were significantly associated with non-accepted surrogates. Surrogates were used most commonly for HIV, diabetes, rare diseases, cardiovascular disease and cancer. For the subset of drugs studied, other HTA agencies did not express concerns for most recommendations, while regulatory agencies frequently stated surrogate acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of surrogates were accepted at the CDR. Non-accepted surrogates were significantly associated with clinical uncertainty and a DNL recommendation. There was inconsistency of surrogate acceptability across several international agencies. Stakeholders should consider collaboratively establishing guidelines on the use, validation, and acceptability of surrogates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3866929 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38669292013-12-19 Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review Rocchi, Angela Khoudigian, Shoghag Hopkins, Rob Goeree, Ron Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: Surrogate outcomes are a significant challenge in drug evaluation for health technology assessment (HTA) agencies. The research objectives were to: identify factors associated with surrogate use and acceptability in Canada’s Common Drug Review (CDR) recommendations, and compare the CDR with other HTA or regulatory agencies regarding surrogate concerns. METHODS: Final recommendations were identified from CDR inception (September 2003) to December 31, 2010. Recommendations were classified by type of outcome (surrogate, final, other) and acceptability of surrogates (determined by the presence/absence of statements of concern regarding surrogates). Descriptive and statistical analyses examined factors related to surrogate use and acceptability. For thirteen surrogate-based submissions, recommendations from international HTA and regulatory agencies were reviewed for statements about surrogate acceptability. RESULTS: Of 156 final recommendations, 68 (44%) involved surrogates. The overall ‘do not list’ (DNL) rate was 48%; the DNL rate for surrogates was 41% (p = 0.175). The DNL rate was 64% for non-accepted surrogates (n = 28) versus 25% for accepted surrogates (odds ratio 5.4, p = 0.002). Clinical uncertainty, use of economic evidence over price alone, and a premium price were significantly associated with non-accepted surrogates. Surrogates were used most commonly for HIV, diabetes, rare diseases, cardiovascular disease and cancer. For the subset of drugs studied, other HTA agencies did not express concerns for most recommendations, while regulatory agencies frequently stated surrogate acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of surrogates were accepted at the CDR. Non-accepted surrogates were significantly associated with clinical uncertainty and a DNL recommendation. There was inconsistency of surrogate acceptability across several international agencies. Stakeholders should consider collaboratively establishing guidelines on the use, validation, and acceptability of surrogates. BioMed Central 2013-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3866929/ /pubmed/24341379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-11-31 Text en Copyright © 2013 Rocchi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Rocchi, Angela Khoudigian, Shoghag Hopkins, Rob Goeree, Ron Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review |
title | Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review |
title_full | Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review |
title_fullStr | Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review |
title_short | Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review |
title_sort | surrogate outcomes: experiences at the common drug review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3866929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24341379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-11-31 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rocchiangela surrogateoutcomesexperiencesatthecommondrugreview AT khoudigianshoghag surrogateoutcomesexperiencesatthecommondrugreview AT hopkinsrob surrogateoutcomesexperiencesatthecommondrugreview AT goereeron surrogateoutcomesexperiencesatthecommondrugreview |