Cargando…

Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review

BACKGROUND: Surrogate outcomes are a significant challenge in drug evaluation for health technology assessment (HTA) agencies. The research objectives were to: identify factors associated with surrogate use and acceptability in Canada’s Common Drug Review (CDR) recommendations, and compare the CDR w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rocchi, Angela, Khoudigian, Shoghag, Hopkins, Rob, Goeree, Ron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3866929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24341379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-11-31
_version_ 1782296243620282368
author Rocchi, Angela
Khoudigian, Shoghag
Hopkins, Rob
Goeree, Ron
author_facet Rocchi, Angela
Khoudigian, Shoghag
Hopkins, Rob
Goeree, Ron
author_sort Rocchi, Angela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surrogate outcomes are a significant challenge in drug evaluation for health technology assessment (HTA) agencies. The research objectives were to: identify factors associated with surrogate use and acceptability in Canada’s Common Drug Review (CDR) recommendations, and compare the CDR with other HTA or regulatory agencies regarding surrogate concerns. METHODS: Final recommendations were identified from CDR inception (September 2003) to December 31, 2010. Recommendations were classified by type of outcome (surrogate, final, other) and acceptability of surrogates (determined by the presence/absence of statements of concern regarding surrogates). Descriptive and statistical analyses examined factors related to surrogate use and acceptability. For thirteen surrogate-based submissions, recommendations from international HTA and regulatory agencies were reviewed for statements about surrogate acceptability. RESULTS: Of 156 final recommendations, 68 (44%) involved surrogates. The overall ‘do not list’ (DNL) rate was 48%; the DNL rate for surrogates was 41% (p = 0.175). The DNL rate was 64% for non-accepted surrogates (n = 28) versus 25% for accepted surrogates (odds ratio 5.4, p = 0.002). Clinical uncertainty, use of economic evidence over price alone, and a premium price were significantly associated with non-accepted surrogates. Surrogates were used most commonly for HIV, diabetes, rare diseases, cardiovascular disease and cancer. For the subset of drugs studied, other HTA agencies did not express concerns for most recommendations, while regulatory agencies frequently stated surrogate acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of surrogates were accepted at the CDR. Non-accepted surrogates were significantly associated with clinical uncertainty and a DNL recommendation. There was inconsistency of surrogate acceptability across several international agencies. Stakeholders should consider collaboratively establishing guidelines on the use, validation, and acceptability of surrogates.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3866929
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38669292013-12-19 Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review Rocchi, Angela Khoudigian, Shoghag Hopkins, Rob Goeree, Ron Cost Eff Resour Alloc Research BACKGROUND: Surrogate outcomes are a significant challenge in drug evaluation for health technology assessment (HTA) agencies. The research objectives were to: identify factors associated with surrogate use and acceptability in Canada’s Common Drug Review (CDR) recommendations, and compare the CDR with other HTA or regulatory agencies regarding surrogate concerns. METHODS: Final recommendations were identified from CDR inception (September 2003) to December 31, 2010. Recommendations were classified by type of outcome (surrogate, final, other) and acceptability of surrogates (determined by the presence/absence of statements of concern regarding surrogates). Descriptive and statistical analyses examined factors related to surrogate use and acceptability. For thirteen surrogate-based submissions, recommendations from international HTA and regulatory agencies were reviewed for statements about surrogate acceptability. RESULTS: Of 156 final recommendations, 68 (44%) involved surrogates. The overall ‘do not list’ (DNL) rate was 48%; the DNL rate for surrogates was 41% (p = 0.175). The DNL rate was 64% for non-accepted surrogates (n = 28) versus 25% for accepted surrogates (odds ratio 5.4, p = 0.002). Clinical uncertainty, use of economic evidence over price alone, and a premium price were significantly associated with non-accepted surrogates. Surrogates were used most commonly for HIV, diabetes, rare diseases, cardiovascular disease and cancer. For the subset of drugs studied, other HTA agencies did not express concerns for most recommendations, while regulatory agencies frequently stated surrogate acceptance. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of surrogates were accepted at the CDR. Non-accepted surrogates were significantly associated with clinical uncertainty and a DNL recommendation. There was inconsistency of surrogate acceptability across several international agencies. Stakeholders should consider collaboratively establishing guidelines on the use, validation, and acceptability of surrogates. BioMed Central 2013-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3866929/ /pubmed/24341379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-11-31 Text en Copyright © 2013 Rocchi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Rocchi, Angela
Khoudigian, Shoghag
Hopkins, Rob
Goeree, Ron
Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review
title Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review
title_full Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review
title_fullStr Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review
title_full_unstemmed Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review
title_short Surrogate outcomes: experiences at the Common Drug Review
title_sort surrogate outcomes: experiences at the common drug review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3866929/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24341379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-11-31
work_keys_str_mv AT rocchiangela surrogateoutcomesexperiencesatthecommondrugreview
AT khoudigianshoghag surrogateoutcomesexperiencesatthecommondrugreview
AT hopkinsrob surrogateoutcomesexperiencesatthecommondrugreview
AT goereeron surrogateoutcomesexperiencesatthecommondrugreview