Cargando…

Improving Diabetes Care in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quality Improvement Interventions in OECD Countries

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite well documented disparities in health and healthcare in rural communities, evidence in relation to quality improvement (QI) interventions in those settings is still lacking. The main goals of this work were to assess the effectiveness of QI strategies designed to improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio, Ruiz-Perez, Isabel, Rojas-García, Antonio, Pastor, Guadalupe, Gonçalves, Daniela C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3868600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24367662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084464
_version_ 1782296479612796928
author Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
Ruiz-Perez, Isabel
Rojas-García, Antonio
Pastor, Guadalupe
Gonçalves, Daniela C.
author_facet Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
Ruiz-Perez, Isabel
Rojas-García, Antonio
Pastor, Guadalupe
Gonçalves, Daniela C.
author_sort Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite well documented disparities in health and healthcare in rural communities, evidence in relation to quality improvement (QI) interventions in those settings is still lacking. The main goals of this work were to assess the effectiveness of QI strategies designed to improve diabetes care in rural areas, and identify characteristics associated with greater success. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and 12 additional bibliographic sources. Experimental studies carried out in the OECD member countries assessing the effectiveness of QI interventions aiming to improve diabetes care in rural areas were included. The effect of the interventions and their impact on glycated hemoglobin was pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies assessing the effectiveness of twenty QI interventions were included. Interventions targeted patients (45%), clinicians (5%), the health system (15%), or several targets (35%), and consisted of the implementation of one or multiple QI strategies. Most of the interventions produced a positive impact on processes of care or diabetes self-management, but a lower effect on health outcomes was observed. Interventions with multiple strategies and targeting the health system and/or clinicians were more likely to be effective. Six QI interventions were included in the meta-analysis (1,496 patients), which showed a significant reduction in overall glycated hemoglobin of 0.41 points from baseline in those patients receiving the interventions (95% CI -0.75% to -0.07%). CONCLUSIONS: This work identified several characteristics associated with successful interventions to improve the quality of diabetes care in rural areas. Efforts to improve diabetes care in rural communities should focus on interventions with multiple strategies targeted at clinicians and/or the health system, rather than on traditional patient-oriented interventions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3868600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38686002013-12-23 Improving Diabetes Care in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quality Improvement Interventions in OECD Countries Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio Ruiz-Perez, Isabel Rojas-García, Antonio Pastor, Guadalupe Gonçalves, Daniela C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Despite well documented disparities in health and healthcare in rural communities, evidence in relation to quality improvement (QI) interventions in those settings is still lacking. The main goals of this work were to assess the effectiveness of QI strategies designed to improve diabetes care in rural areas, and identify characteristics associated with greater success. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and 12 additional bibliographic sources. Experimental studies carried out in the OECD member countries assessing the effectiveness of QI interventions aiming to improve diabetes care in rural areas were included. The effect of the interventions and their impact on glycated hemoglobin was pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies assessing the effectiveness of twenty QI interventions were included. Interventions targeted patients (45%), clinicians (5%), the health system (15%), or several targets (35%), and consisted of the implementation of one or multiple QI strategies. Most of the interventions produced a positive impact on processes of care or diabetes self-management, but a lower effect on health outcomes was observed. Interventions with multiple strategies and targeting the health system and/or clinicians were more likely to be effective. Six QI interventions were included in the meta-analysis (1,496 patients), which showed a significant reduction in overall glycated hemoglobin of 0.41 points from baseline in those patients receiving the interventions (95% CI -0.75% to -0.07%). CONCLUSIONS: This work identified several characteristics associated with successful interventions to improve the quality of diabetes care in rural areas. Efforts to improve diabetes care in rural communities should focus on interventions with multiple strategies targeted at clinicians and/or the health system, rather than on traditional patient-oriented interventions. Public Library of Science 2013-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3868600/ /pubmed/24367662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084464 Text en © 2013 Ricci-Cabello et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ricci-Cabello, Ignacio
Ruiz-Perez, Isabel
Rojas-García, Antonio
Pastor, Guadalupe
Gonçalves, Daniela C.
Improving Diabetes Care in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quality Improvement Interventions in OECD Countries
title Improving Diabetes Care in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quality Improvement Interventions in OECD Countries
title_full Improving Diabetes Care in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quality Improvement Interventions in OECD Countries
title_fullStr Improving Diabetes Care in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quality Improvement Interventions in OECD Countries
title_full_unstemmed Improving Diabetes Care in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quality Improvement Interventions in OECD Countries
title_short Improving Diabetes Care in Rural Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quality Improvement Interventions in OECD Countries
title_sort improving diabetes care in rural areas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of quality improvement interventions in oecd countries
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3868600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24367662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084464
work_keys_str_mv AT riccicabelloignacio improvingdiabetescareinruralareasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofqualityimprovementinterventionsinoecdcountries
AT ruizperezisabel improvingdiabetescareinruralareasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofqualityimprovementinterventionsinoecdcountries
AT rojasgarciaantonio improvingdiabetescareinruralareasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofqualityimprovementinterventionsinoecdcountries
AT pastorguadalupe improvingdiabetescareinruralareasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofqualityimprovementinterventionsinoecdcountries
AT goncalvesdanielac improvingdiabetescareinruralareasasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofqualityimprovementinterventionsinoecdcountries