Cargando…

Variance in Brain Volume with Advancing Age: Implications for Defining the Limits of Normality

BACKGROUND: Statistical models of normal ageing brain tissue volumes may support earlier diagnosis of increasingly common, yet still fatal, neurodegenerative diseases. For example, the statistically defined distribution of normal ageing brain tissue volumes may be used as a reference to assess patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickie, David Alexander, Job, Dominic E., Gonzalez, David Rodriguez, Shenkin, Susan D., Ahearn, Trevor S., Murray, Alison D., Wardlaw, Joanna M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3868601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24367629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084093
_version_ 1782296479834046464
author Dickie, David Alexander
Job, Dominic E.
Gonzalez, David Rodriguez
Shenkin, Susan D.
Ahearn, Trevor S.
Murray, Alison D.
Wardlaw, Joanna M.
author_facet Dickie, David Alexander
Job, Dominic E.
Gonzalez, David Rodriguez
Shenkin, Susan D.
Ahearn, Trevor S.
Murray, Alison D.
Wardlaw, Joanna M.
author_sort Dickie, David Alexander
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Statistical models of normal ageing brain tissue volumes may support earlier diagnosis of increasingly common, yet still fatal, neurodegenerative diseases. For example, the statistically defined distribution of normal ageing brain tissue volumes may be used as a reference to assess patient volumes. To date, such models were often derived from mean values which were assumed to represent the distributions and boundaries, i.e. percentile ranks, of brain tissue volume. Since it was previously unknown, the objective of the present study was to determine if this assumption was robust, i.e. whether regression models derived from mean values accurately represented the distributions and boundaries of brain tissue volume at older ages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We acquired T1-w magnetic resonance (MR) brain images of 227 normal and 219 Alzheimer’s disease (AD) subjects (aged 55-89 years) from publicly available databanks. Using nonlinear regression within both samples, we compared mean and percentile rank estimates of whole brain tissue volume by age. RESULTS: In both the normal and AD sample, mean regression estimates of brain tissue volume often did not accurately represent percentile rank estimates (errors=-74% to 75%). In the normal sample, mean estimates generally underestimated differences in brain volume at percentile ranks below the mean. Conversely, in the AD sample, mean estimates generally underestimated differences in brain volume at percentile ranks above the mean. Differences between ages at the 5(th) percentile rank of normal subjects were ~39% greater than mean differences in the AD subjects. CONCLUSIONS: While more data are required to make true population inferences, our results indicate that mean regression estimates may not accurately represent the distributions of ageing brain tissue volumes. This suggests that percentile rank estimates will be required to robustly define the limits of brain tissue volume in normal ageing and neurodegenerative disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3868601
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38686012013-12-23 Variance in Brain Volume with Advancing Age: Implications for Defining the Limits of Normality Dickie, David Alexander Job, Dominic E. Gonzalez, David Rodriguez Shenkin, Susan D. Ahearn, Trevor S. Murray, Alison D. Wardlaw, Joanna M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Statistical models of normal ageing brain tissue volumes may support earlier diagnosis of increasingly common, yet still fatal, neurodegenerative diseases. For example, the statistically defined distribution of normal ageing brain tissue volumes may be used as a reference to assess patient volumes. To date, such models were often derived from mean values which were assumed to represent the distributions and boundaries, i.e. percentile ranks, of brain tissue volume. Since it was previously unknown, the objective of the present study was to determine if this assumption was robust, i.e. whether regression models derived from mean values accurately represented the distributions and boundaries of brain tissue volume at older ages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We acquired T1-w magnetic resonance (MR) brain images of 227 normal and 219 Alzheimer’s disease (AD) subjects (aged 55-89 years) from publicly available databanks. Using nonlinear regression within both samples, we compared mean and percentile rank estimates of whole brain tissue volume by age. RESULTS: In both the normal and AD sample, mean regression estimates of brain tissue volume often did not accurately represent percentile rank estimates (errors=-74% to 75%). In the normal sample, mean estimates generally underestimated differences in brain volume at percentile ranks below the mean. Conversely, in the AD sample, mean estimates generally underestimated differences in brain volume at percentile ranks above the mean. Differences between ages at the 5(th) percentile rank of normal subjects were ~39% greater than mean differences in the AD subjects. CONCLUSIONS: While more data are required to make true population inferences, our results indicate that mean regression estimates may not accurately represent the distributions of ageing brain tissue volumes. This suggests that percentile rank estimates will be required to robustly define the limits of brain tissue volume in normal ageing and neurodegenerative disease. Public Library of Science 2013-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3868601/ /pubmed/24367629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084093 Text en © 2013 Dickie et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dickie, David Alexander
Job, Dominic E.
Gonzalez, David Rodriguez
Shenkin, Susan D.
Ahearn, Trevor S.
Murray, Alison D.
Wardlaw, Joanna M.
Variance in Brain Volume with Advancing Age: Implications for Defining the Limits of Normality
title Variance in Brain Volume with Advancing Age: Implications for Defining the Limits of Normality
title_full Variance in Brain Volume with Advancing Age: Implications for Defining the Limits of Normality
title_fullStr Variance in Brain Volume with Advancing Age: Implications for Defining the Limits of Normality
title_full_unstemmed Variance in Brain Volume with Advancing Age: Implications for Defining the Limits of Normality
title_short Variance in Brain Volume with Advancing Age: Implications for Defining the Limits of Normality
title_sort variance in brain volume with advancing age: implications for defining the limits of normality
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3868601/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24367629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084093
work_keys_str_mv AT dickiedavidalexander varianceinbrainvolumewithadvancingageimplicationsfordefiningthelimitsofnormality
AT jobdominice varianceinbrainvolumewithadvancingageimplicationsfordefiningthelimitsofnormality
AT gonzalezdavidrodriguez varianceinbrainvolumewithadvancingageimplicationsfordefiningthelimitsofnormality
AT shenkinsusand varianceinbrainvolumewithadvancingageimplicationsfordefiningthelimitsofnormality
AT ahearntrevors varianceinbrainvolumewithadvancingageimplicationsfordefiningthelimitsofnormality
AT murrayalisond varianceinbrainvolumewithadvancingageimplicationsfordefiningthelimitsofnormality
AT wardlawjoannam varianceinbrainvolumewithadvancingageimplicationsfordefiningthelimitsofnormality