Cargando…

Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look?

Over 100 years ago it was suggested that osteocytes could remodel their surrounding environment by removing and replacing bone. In the 1960s and 1970s, many observations were made to suggest that osteocytes could resorb bone and increase the size of their lacunae. This concept became known as osteoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wysolmerski, John J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3868715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24363929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2012.229
_version_ 1782296497325342720
author Wysolmerski, John J
author_facet Wysolmerski, John J
author_sort Wysolmerski, John J
collection PubMed
description Over 100 years ago it was suggested that osteocytes could remodel their surrounding environment by removing and replacing bone. In the 1960s and 1970s, many observations were made to suggest that osteocytes could resorb bone and increase the size of their lacunae. This concept became known as osteocytic osteolysis and studies suggested that it occurred in response to diverse stimuli such as parathyroid hormone, calcium restriction, hibernation and reproductive cycles. However, this concept fell out of favor in the late 1970s when it became clear that osteoclasts were the principal bone-resorbing cells in the skeleton. Over the past decade, we have increasingly appreciated that osteocytes are remarkably versatile cells and are involved in all aspects of skeletal biology, including the response to loading, the regulation of bone turnover and the control of mineral metabolism. Recent data have demonstrated that osteocytes remodel their perilacunar and canalicular matrix and participate in the liberation of skeletal calcium stores during lactation. In light of these new findings, it may be time to reassess the concept of osteocytic osteolysis and reconsider whether osteocyte lacunar and canalicular remodeling contributes more broadly to the maintenance of skeletal and mineral homeostasis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3868715
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38687152013-12-20 Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look? Wysolmerski, John J Bonekey Rep Review Article Over 100 years ago it was suggested that osteocytes could remodel their surrounding environment by removing and replacing bone. In the 1960s and 1970s, many observations were made to suggest that osteocytes could resorb bone and increase the size of their lacunae. This concept became known as osteocytic osteolysis and studies suggested that it occurred in response to diverse stimuli such as parathyroid hormone, calcium restriction, hibernation and reproductive cycles. However, this concept fell out of favor in the late 1970s when it became clear that osteoclasts were the principal bone-resorbing cells in the skeleton. Over the past decade, we have increasingly appreciated that osteocytes are remarkably versatile cells and are involved in all aspects of skeletal biology, including the response to loading, the regulation of bone turnover and the control of mineral metabolism. Recent data have demonstrated that osteocytes remodel their perilacunar and canalicular matrix and participate in the liberation of skeletal calcium stores during lactation. In light of these new findings, it may be time to reassess the concept of osteocytic osteolysis and reconsider whether osteocyte lacunar and canalicular remodeling contributes more broadly to the maintenance of skeletal and mineral homeostasis. Nature Publishing Group 2012-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3868715/ /pubmed/24363929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2012.229 Text en Copyright © 2012, International Bone & Mineral Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Review Article
Wysolmerski, John J
Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look?
title Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look?
title_full Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look?
title_fullStr Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look?
title_full_unstemmed Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look?
title_short Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look?
title_sort osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look?
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3868715/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24363929
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2012.229
work_keys_str_mv AT wysolmerskijohnj osteocyticosteolysistimeforasecondlook