Cargando…
Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look?
Over 100 years ago it was suggested that osteocytes could remodel their surrounding environment by removing and replacing bone. In the 1960s and 1970s, many observations were made to suggest that osteocytes could resorb bone and increase the size of their lacunae. This concept became known as osteoc...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3868715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24363929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2012.229 |
_version_ | 1782296497325342720 |
---|---|
author | Wysolmerski, John J |
author_facet | Wysolmerski, John J |
author_sort | Wysolmerski, John J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over 100 years ago it was suggested that osteocytes could remodel their surrounding environment by removing and replacing bone. In the 1960s and 1970s, many observations were made to suggest that osteocytes could resorb bone and increase the size of their lacunae. This concept became known as osteocytic osteolysis and studies suggested that it occurred in response to diverse stimuli such as parathyroid hormone, calcium restriction, hibernation and reproductive cycles. However, this concept fell out of favor in the late 1970s when it became clear that osteoclasts were the principal bone-resorbing cells in the skeleton. Over the past decade, we have increasingly appreciated that osteocytes are remarkably versatile cells and are involved in all aspects of skeletal biology, including the response to loading, the regulation of bone turnover and the control of mineral metabolism. Recent data have demonstrated that osteocytes remodel their perilacunar and canalicular matrix and participate in the liberation of skeletal calcium stores during lactation. In light of these new findings, it may be time to reassess the concept of osteocytic osteolysis and reconsider whether osteocyte lacunar and canalicular remodeling contributes more broadly to the maintenance of skeletal and mineral homeostasis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3868715 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38687152013-12-20 Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look? Wysolmerski, John J Bonekey Rep Review Article Over 100 years ago it was suggested that osteocytes could remodel their surrounding environment by removing and replacing bone. In the 1960s and 1970s, many observations were made to suggest that osteocytes could resorb bone and increase the size of their lacunae. This concept became known as osteocytic osteolysis and studies suggested that it occurred in response to diverse stimuli such as parathyroid hormone, calcium restriction, hibernation and reproductive cycles. However, this concept fell out of favor in the late 1970s when it became clear that osteoclasts were the principal bone-resorbing cells in the skeleton. Over the past decade, we have increasingly appreciated that osteocytes are remarkably versatile cells and are involved in all aspects of skeletal biology, including the response to loading, the regulation of bone turnover and the control of mineral metabolism. Recent data have demonstrated that osteocytes remodel their perilacunar and canalicular matrix and participate in the liberation of skeletal calcium stores during lactation. In light of these new findings, it may be time to reassess the concept of osteocytic osteolysis and reconsider whether osteocyte lacunar and canalicular remodeling contributes more broadly to the maintenance of skeletal and mineral homeostasis. Nature Publishing Group 2012-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3868715/ /pubmed/24363929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2012.229 Text en Copyright © 2012, International Bone & Mineral Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Review Article Wysolmerski, John J Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look? |
title | Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look? |
title_full | Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look? |
title_fullStr | Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look? |
title_full_unstemmed | Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look? |
title_short | Osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look? |
title_sort | osteocytic osteolysis: time for a second look? |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3868715/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24363929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bonekey.2012.229 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wysolmerskijohnj osteocyticosteolysistimeforasecondlook |