Cargando…

US medical specialty global health training and the global burden of disease

BACKGROUND: Rapid growth in global health activity among US medical specialty education programs has lead to heterogeneity in types of activities and global health training models. The breadth and scope of this activity is not well chronicled. METHODS: Using a standardized search protocol, we examin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kerry, Vanessa B., Walensky, Rochelle P., Tsai, Alexander C., Bergmark, Regan W., Bergmark, Brian A., Rouse, Chaturia, Bangsberg, David R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3868823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24363924
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.03.020406
_version_ 1782296502553542656
author Kerry, Vanessa B.
Walensky, Rochelle P.
Tsai, Alexander C.
Bergmark, Regan W.
Bergmark, Brian A.
Rouse, Chaturia
Bangsberg, David R.
author_facet Kerry, Vanessa B.
Walensky, Rochelle P.
Tsai, Alexander C.
Bergmark, Regan W.
Bergmark, Brian A.
Rouse, Chaturia
Bangsberg, David R.
author_sort Kerry, Vanessa B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rapid growth in global health activity among US medical specialty education programs has lead to heterogeneity in types of activities and global health training models. The breadth and scope of this activity is not well chronicled. METHODS: Using a standardized search protocol, we examined the characteristics of US medical residency global health programs by number of programs, clinical specialty, nature of activity (elective, research, extended curriculum based field training), and geographic location across seven different clinical medical residency education specialties. We tabulated programmatic activity by clinical discipline, region and country. We calculated the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient to estimate the association between programmatic activity and country–level disease burden. RESULTS: Of the 1856 programs assessed between January and June 2011, there were 380 global health residency training programs (20%) working in 141 countries. 529 individual programmatic activities (elective–based rotations, research programs, extended curriculum–based field training, or other) occurred at 1337 specific sites. The majority of the activities consisted of elective–based rotations. At the country level, disease burden had a statistically significant association with programmatic activity (Spearman's ρ = 0.17) but only explained 3% of the total variation between countries. CONCLUSIONS: There were a substantial number of US medical specialty global health programs, but a relative paucity of surgical and mental health programs. Elective–based programs were more common than programs that offer longitudinal experiences. Despite heterogeneity, there was a small but statistically significant association between program location and the global burden of disease. Areas for further study include the degree to which US–based programs develop partnerships with their program sites, the significance of this activity for training, and number and breadth of programs in medical specialty global health education in other countries around the world.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3868823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Edinburgh University Global Health Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38688232013-12-20 US medical specialty global health training and the global burden of disease Kerry, Vanessa B. Walensky, Rochelle P. Tsai, Alexander C. Bergmark, Regan W. Bergmark, Brian A. Rouse, Chaturia Bangsberg, David R. J Glob Health Article BACKGROUND: Rapid growth in global health activity among US medical specialty education programs has lead to heterogeneity in types of activities and global health training models. The breadth and scope of this activity is not well chronicled. METHODS: Using a standardized search protocol, we examined the characteristics of US medical residency global health programs by number of programs, clinical specialty, nature of activity (elective, research, extended curriculum based field training), and geographic location across seven different clinical medical residency education specialties. We tabulated programmatic activity by clinical discipline, region and country. We calculated the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient to estimate the association between programmatic activity and country–level disease burden. RESULTS: Of the 1856 programs assessed between January and June 2011, there were 380 global health residency training programs (20%) working in 141 countries. 529 individual programmatic activities (elective–based rotations, research programs, extended curriculum–based field training, or other) occurred at 1337 specific sites. The majority of the activities consisted of elective–based rotations. At the country level, disease burden had a statistically significant association with programmatic activity (Spearman's ρ = 0.17) but only explained 3% of the total variation between countries. CONCLUSIONS: There were a substantial number of US medical specialty global health programs, but a relative paucity of surgical and mental health programs. Elective–based programs were more common than programs that offer longitudinal experiences. Despite heterogeneity, there was a small but statistically significant association between program location and the global burden of disease. Areas for further study include the degree to which US–based programs develop partnerships with their program sites, the significance of this activity for training, and number and breadth of programs in medical specialty global health education in other countries around the world. Edinburgh University Global Health Society 2013-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3868823/ /pubmed/24363924 http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.03.020406 Text en Copyright © 2013 by the Journal of Global Health. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Kerry, Vanessa B.
Walensky, Rochelle P.
Tsai, Alexander C.
Bergmark, Regan W.
Bergmark, Brian A.
Rouse, Chaturia
Bangsberg, David R.
US medical specialty global health training and the global burden of disease
title US medical specialty global health training and the global burden of disease
title_full US medical specialty global health training and the global burden of disease
title_fullStr US medical specialty global health training and the global burden of disease
title_full_unstemmed US medical specialty global health training and the global burden of disease
title_short US medical specialty global health training and the global burden of disease
title_sort us medical specialty global health training and the global burden of disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3868823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24363924
http://dx.doi.org/10.7189/jogh.03.020406
work_keys_str_mv AT kerryvanessab usmedicalspecialtyglobalhealthtrainingandtheglobalburdenofdisease
AT walenskyrochellep usmedicalspecialtyglobalhealthtrainingandtheglobalburdenofdisease
AT tsaialexanderc usmedicalspecialtyglobalhealthtrainingandtheglobalburdenofdisease
AT bergmarkreganw usmedicalspecialtyglobalhealthtrainingandtheglobalburdenofdisease
AT bergmarkbriana usmedicalspecialtyglobalhealthtrainingandtheglobalburdenofdisease
AT rousechaturia usmedicalspecialtyglobalhealthtrainingandtheglobalburdenofdisease
AT bangsbergdavidr usmedicalspecialtyglobalhealthtrainingandtheglobalburdenofdisease