Cargando…

Validity and Reliability of Using a Self-Lavaging Device for Cytology and HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: Findings from a Pilot Study

Self-sampling could increase cervical cancer screening uptake. While methods have been identified for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, to date, self-sampling has not provided adequate specimens for cytology. We piloted the validity and reliability of using a self-lavaging device for cervical cyto...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, Heidi E., Mansukhani, Mahesh M., Tong, Guo-Xia, Westhoff, Carolyn L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3869665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24376516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082115
_version_ 1782296588738101248
author Jones, Heidi E.
Mansukhani, Mahesh M.
Tong, Guo-Xia
Westhoff, Carolyn L.
author_facet Jones, Heidi E.
Mansukhani, Mahesh M.
Tong, Guo-Xia
Westhoff, Carolyn L.
author_sort Jones, Heidi E.
collection PubMed
description Self-sampling could increase cervical cancer screening uptake. While methods have been identified for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, to date, self-sampling has not provided adequate specimens for cytology. We piloted the validity and reliability of using a self-lavaging device for cervical cytology and HPV testing. We enrolled 198 women in New York City in 2008–2009 from three ambulatory clinics where they received cervical cancer screening. All were asked to use the Delphi Screener™ to self-lavage 1–3 months after clinician-collected index cytological smear (100 normal; 98 abnormal). Women with abnormal cytology results from either specimen underwent colposcopy; 10 women with normal results from both specimens also underwent colposcopy. We calculated sensitivity of self-collected cytology to detect histologically confirmed high grade lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN, 2+); specificity for histology-negative (CIN 1 or lower), paired cytology negative, or a third cytology negative; and kappa for paired results. One hundred and ninety-seven (99.5%) women self-collected a lavage. Seventy-five percent had moderate to excellent cellularity, two specimens were unsatisfactory for cytology. Seven of 167 (4%) women with definitive results had CIN2+; one had normal and six abnormal cytology results with the self-lavage (sensitivity = 86%, 95% Confidence Interval, CI: 42, 100). The kappa for paired cytology was low (0.36; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.47) primarily due to clinician specimens with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) coded as normal using Screener specimens. However, three cases of HSIL were coded as ASC-US and one as normal using Screener specimens. Seventy-three women had paired high-risk HPV tests with a kappa of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.84). Based on these preliminary findings, a larger study to estimate the performance of the Screener for co-testing cytology and HPV or for HPV testing with cytology triage is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00702208
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3869665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38696652013-12-27 Validity and Reliability of Using a Self-Lavaging Device for Cytology and HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: Findings from a Pilot Study Jones, Heidi E. Mansukhani, Mahesh M. Tong, Guo-Xia Westhoff, Carolyn L. PLoS One Research Article Self-sampling could increase cervical cancer screening uptake. While methods have been identified for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing, to date, self-sampling has not provided adequate specimens for cytology. We piloted the validity and reliability of using a self-lavaging device for cervical cytology and HPV testing. We enrolled 198 women in New York City in 2008–2009 from three ambulatory clinics where they received cervical cancer screening. All were asked to use the Delphi Screener™ to self-lavage 1–3 months after clinician-collected index cytological smear (100 normal; 98 abnormal). Women with abnormal cytology results from either specimen underwent colposcopy; 10 women with normal results from both specimens also underwent colposcopy. We calculated sensitivity of self-collected cytology to detect histologically confirmed high grade lesions (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN, 2+); specificity for histology-negative (CIN 1 or lower), paired cytology negative, or a third cytology negative; and kappa for paired results. One hundred and ninety-seven (99.5%) women self-collected a lavage. Seventy-five percent had moderate to excellent cellularity, two specimens were unsatisfactory for cytology. Seven of 167 (4%) women with definitive results had CIN2+; one had normal and six abnormal cytology results with the self-lavage (sensitivity = 86%, 95% Confidence Interval, CI: 42, 100). The kappa for paired cytology was low (0.36; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.47) primarily due to clinician specimens with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) coded as normal using Screener specimens. However, three cases of HSIL were coded as ASC-US and one as normal using Screener specimens. Seventy-three women had paired high-risk HPV tests with a kappa of 0.66 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.84). Based on these preliminary findings, a larger study to estimate the performance of the Screener for co-testing cytology and HPV or for HPV testing with cytology triage is warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00702208 Public Library of Science 2013-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3869665/ /pubmed/24376516 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082115 Text en © 2013 Jones et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jones, Heidi E.
Mansukhani, Mahesh M.
Tong, Guo-Xia
Westhoff, Carolyn L.
Validity and Reliability of Using a Self-Lavaging Device for Cytology and HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: Findings from a Pilot Study
title Validity and Reliability of Using a Self-Lavaging Device for Cytology and HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: Findings from a Pilot Study
title_full Validity and Reliability of Using a Self-Lavaging Device for Cytology and HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: Findings from a Pilot Study
title_fullStr Validity and Reliability of Using a Self-Lavaging Device for Cytology and HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: Findings from a Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Validity and Reliability of Using a Self-Lavaging Device for Cytology and HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: Findings from a Pilot Study
title_short Validity and Reliability of Using a Self-Lavaging Device for Cytology and HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: Findings from a Pilot Study
title_sort validity and reliability of using a self-lavaging device for cytology and hpv testing for cervical cancer screening: findings from a pilot study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3869665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24376516
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082115
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesheidie validityandreliabilityofusingaselflavagingdeviceforcytologyandhpvtestingforcervicalcancerscreeningfindingsfromapilotstudy
AT mansukhanimaheshm validityandreliabilityofusingaselflavagingdeviceforcytologyandhpvtestingforcervicalcancerscreeningfindingsfromapilotstudy
AT tongguoxia validityandreliabilityofusingaselflavagingdeviceforcytologyandhpvtestingforcervicalcancerscreeningfindingsfromapilotstudy
AT westhoffcarolynl validityandreliabilityofusingaselflavagingdeviceforcytologyandhpvtestingforcervicalcancerscreeningfindingsfromapilotstudy