Cargando…
Representation of Ecosystem Services by Terrestrial Protected Areas: Chile as a Case Study
Protected areas are increasingly considered to play a key role in the global maintenance of ecosystem processes and the ecosystem services they provide. It is thus vital to assess the extent to which existing protected area systems represent those services. Here, for the first time, we document the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3869732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24376559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082643 |
_version_ | 1782296603179089920 |
---|---|
author | Durán, América P. Casalegno, Stefano Marquet, Pablo A. Gaston, Kevin J. |
author_facet | Durán, América P. Casalegno, Stefano Marquet, Pablo A. Gaston, Kevin J. |
author_sort | Durán, América P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Protected areas are increasingly considered to play a key role in the global maintenance of ecosystem processes and the ecosystem services they provide. It is thus vital to assess the extent to which existing protected area systems represent those services. Here, for the first time, we document the effectiveness of the current Chilean protected area system and its planned extensions in representing both ecosystem services (plant productivity, carbon storage and agricultural production) and biodiversity. Additionally, we evaluate the effectiveness of protected areas based on their respective management objectives. Our results show that existing protected areas in Chile do not contain an unusually high proportion of carbon storage (14.9%), agricultural production (0.2%) or biodiversity (11.8%), and also represent a low level of plant productivity (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index of 0.38). Proposed additional priority sites enhance the representation of ecosystem services and biodiversity, but not sufficiently to attain levels of representation higher than would be expected for their area of coverage. Moreover, when the species groups were assessed separately, amphibians was the only one well represented. Suggested priority sites for biodiversity conservation, without formal protection yet, was the only protected area category that over-represents carbon storage, agricultural production and biodiversity. The low representation of ecosystem services and species’ distribution ranges by the current protected area system is because these protected areas are heavily biased toward southern Chile, and contain large extents of ice and bare rock. The designation and management of proposed priority sites needs to be addressed in order to increase the representation of ecosystem services within the Chilean protected area system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3869732 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38697322013-12-27 Representation of Ecosystem Services by Terrestrial Protected Areas: Chile as a Case Study Durán, América P. Casalegno, Stefano Marquet, Pablo A. Gaston, Kevin J. PLoS One Research Article Protected areas are increasingly considered to play a key role in the global maintenance of ecosystem processes and the ecosystem services they provide. It is thus vital to assess the extent to which existing protected area systems represent those services. Here, for the first time, we document the effectiveness of the current Chilean protected area system and its planned extensions in representing both ecosystem services (plant productivity, carbon storage and agricultural production) and biodiversity. Additionally, we evaluate the effectiveness of protected areas based on their respective management objectives. Our results show that existing protected areas in Chile do not contain an unusually high proportion of carbon storage (14.9%), agricultural production (0.2%) or biodiversity (11.8%), and also represent a low level of plant productivity (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index of 0.38). Proposed additional priority sites enhance the representation of ecosystem services and biodiversity, but not sufficiently to attain levels of representation higher than would be expected for their area of coverage. Moreover, when the species groups were assessed separately, amphibians was the only one well represented. Suggested priority sites for biodiversity conservation, without formal protection yet, was the only protected area category that over-represents carbon storage, agricultural production and biodiversity. The low representation of ecosystem services and species’ distribution ranges by the current protected area system is because these protected areas are heavily biased toward southern Chile, and contain large extents of ice and bare rock. The designation and management of proposed priority sites needs to be addressed in order to increase the representation of ecosystem services within the Chilean protected area system. Public Library of Science 2013-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3869732/ /pubmed/24376559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082643 Text en © 2013 Durán et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Durán, América P. Casalegno, Stefano Marquet, Pablo A. Gaston, Kevin J. Representation of Ecosystem Services by Terrestrial Protected Areas: Chile as a Case Study |
title | Representation of Ecosystem Services by Terrestrial Protected Areas: Chile as a Case Study |
title_full | Representation of Ecosystem Services by Terrestrial Protected Areas: Chile as a Case Study |
title_fullStr | Representation of Ecosystem Services by Terrestrial Protected Areas: Chile as a Case Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Representation of Ecosystem Services by Terrestrial Protected Areas: Chile as a Case Study |
title_short | Representation of Ecosystem Services by Terrestrial Protected Areas: Chile as a Case Study |
title_sort | representation of ecosystem services by terrestrial protected areas: chile as a case study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3869732/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24376559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082643 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duranamericap representationofecosystemservicesbyterrestrialprotectedareaschileasacasestudy AT casalegnostefano representationofecosystemservicesbyterrestrialprotectedareaschileasacasestudy AT marquetpabloa representationofecosystemservicesbyterrestrialprotectedareaschileasacasestudy AT gastonkevinj representationofecosystemservicesbyterrestrialprotectedareaschileasacasestudy |