Cargando…

Rural Clinician Scarcity and Job Preferences of Doctors and Nurses in India: A Discrete Choice Experiment

The scarcity of rural doctors has undermined the ability of health systems in low and middle-income countries like India to provide quality services to rural populations. This study examines job preferences of doctors and nurses to inform what works in terms of rural recruitment strategies. Job acce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rao, Krishna D., Ryan, Mandy, Shroff, Zubin, Vujicic, Marko, Ramani, Sudha, Berman, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3869745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24376621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082984
_version_ 1782296606111956992
author Rao, Krishna D.
Ryan, Mandy
Shroff, Zubin
Vujicic, Marko
Ramani, Sudha
Berman, Peter
author_facet Rao, Krishna D.
Ryan, Mandy
Shroff, Zubin
Vujicic, Marko
Ramani, Sudha
Berman, Peter
author_sort Rao, Krishna D.
collection PubMed
description The scarcity of rural doctors has undermined the ability of health systems in low and middle-income countries like India to provide quality services to rural populations. This study examines job preferences of doctors and nurses to inform what works in terms of rural recruitment strategies. Job acceptance of different strategies was compared to identify policy options for increasing the availability of clinical providers in rural areas. In 2010 a Discrete Choice Experiment was conducted in India. The study sample included final year medical and nursing students, and in-service doctors and nurses serving at Primary Health Centers. Eight job attributes were identified and a D-efficient fractional factorial design was used to construct pairs of job choices. Respondent acceptance of job choices was analyzed using multi-level logistic regression. Location mattered; jobs in areas offering urban amenities had a high likelihood of being accepted. Higher salary had small effect on doctor, but large effect on nurse, acceptance of rural jobs. At five times current salary levels, 13% (31%) of medical students (doctors) were willing to accept rural jobs. At half this level, 61% (52%) of nursing students (nurses) accepted a rural job. The strategy of reserving seats for specialist training in exchange for rural service had a large effect on job acceptance among doctors, nurses and nursing students. For doctors and nurses, properly staffed and equipped health facilities, and housing had small effects on job acceptance. Rural upbringing was not associated with rural job acceptance. Incentivizing doctors for rural service is expensive. A broader strategy of substantial salary increases with improved living, working environment, and education incentives is necessary. For both doctors and nurses, the usual strategies of moderate salary increases, good facility infrastructure, and housing will not be effective. Non-physician clinicians like nurse-practitioners offer an affordable alternative for delivering rural health care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3869745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38697452013-12-27 Rural Clinician Scarcity and Job Preferences of Doctors and Nurses in India: A Discrete Choice Experiment Rao, Krishna D. Ryan, Mandy Shroff, Zubin Vujicic, Marko Ramani, Sudha Berman, Peter PLoS One Research Article The scarcity of rural doctors has undermined the ability of health systems in low and middle-income countries like India to provide quality services to rural populations. This study examines job preferences of doctors and nurses to inform what works in terms of rural recruitment strategies. Job acceptance of different strategies was compared to identify policy options for increasing the availability of clinical providers in rural areas. In 2010 a Discrete Choice Experiment was conducted in India. The study sample included final year medical and nursing students, and in-service doctors and nurses serving at Primary Health Centers. Eight job attributes were identified and a D-efficient fractional factorial design was used to construct pairs of job choices. Respondent acceptance of job choices was analyzed using multi-level logistic regression. Location mattered; jobs in areas offering urban amenities had a high likelihood of being accepted. Higher salary had small effect on doctor, but large effect on nurse, acceptance of rural jobs. At five times current salary levels, 13% (31%) of medical students (doctors) were willing to accept rural jobs. At half this level, 61% (52%) of nursing students (nurses) accepted a rural job. The strategy of reserving seats for specialist training in exchange for rural service had a large effect on job acceptance among doctors, nurses and nursing students. For doctors and nurses, properly staffed and equipped health facilities, and housing had small effects on job acceptance. Rural upbringing was not associated with rural job acceptance. Incentivizing doctors for rural service is expensive. A broader strategy of substantial salary increases with improved living, working environment, and education incentives is necessary. For both doctors and nurses, the usual strategies of moderate salary increases, good facility infrastructure, and housing will not be effective. Non-physician clinicians like nurse-practitioners offer an affordable alternative for delivering rural health care. Public Library of Science 2013-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3869745/ /pubmed/24376621 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082984 Text en © 2013 Rao et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rao, Krishna D.
Ryan, Mandy
Shroff, Zubin
Vujicic, Marko
Ramani, Sudha
Berman, Peter
Rural Clinician Scarcity and Job Preferences of Doctors and Nurses in India: A Discrete Choice Experiment
title Rural Clinician Scarcity and Job Preferences of Doctors and Nurses in India: A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_full Rural Clinician Scarcity and Job Preferences of Doctors and Nurses in India: A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_fullStr Rural Clinician Scarcity and Job Preferences of Doctors and Nurses in India: A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_full_unstemmed Rural Clinician Scarcity and Job Preferences of Doctors and Nurses in India: A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_short Rural Clinician Scarcity and Job Preferences of Doctors and Nurses in India: A Discrete Choice Experiment
title_sort rural clinician scarcity and job preferences of doctors and nurses in india: a discrete choice experiment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3869745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24376621
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082984
work_keys_str_mv AT raokrishnad ruralclinicianscarcityandjobpreferencesofdoctorsandnursesinindiaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT ryanmandy ruralclinicianscarcityandjobpreferencesofdoctorsandnursesinindiaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT shroffzubin ruralclinicianscarcityandjobpreferencesofdoctorsandnursesinindiaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT vujicicmarko ruralclinicianscarcityandjobpreferencesofdoctorsandnursesinindiaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT ramanisudha ruralclinicianscarcityandjobpreferencesofdoctorsandnursesinindiaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT bermanpeter ruralclinicianscarcityandjobpreferencesofdoctorsandnursesinindiaadiscretechoiceexperiment