Cargando…

3D prostate histology image reconstruction: Quantifying the impact of tissue deformation and histology section location

BACKGROUND: Guidelines for localizing prostate cancer on imaging are ideally informed by registered post-prostatectomy histology. 3D histology reconstruction methods can support this by reintroducing 3D spatial information lost during histology processing. The need to register small, high-grade foci...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibson, Eli, Gaed, Mena, Gómez, José A., Moussa, Madeleine, Pautler, Stephen, Chin, Joseph L., Crukley, Cathie, Bauman, Glenn S., Fenster, Aaron, Ward, Aaron D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3869958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24392245
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.120874
_version_ 1782296644529684480
author Gibson, Eli
Gaed, Mena
Gómez, José A.
Moussa, Madeleine
Pautler, Stephen
Chin, Joseph L.
Crukley, Cathie
Bauman, Glenn S.
Fenster, Aaron
Ward, Aaron D.
author_facet Gibson, Eli
Gaed, Mena
Gómez, José A.
Moussa, Madeleine
Pautler, Stephen
Chin, Joseph L.
Crukley, Cathie
Bauman, Glenn S.
Fenster, Aaron
Ward, Aaron D.
author_sort Gibson, Eli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Guidelines for localizing prostate cancer on imaging are ideally informed by registered post-prostatectomy histology. 3D histology reconstruction methods can support this by reintroducing 3D spatial information lost during histology processing. The need to register small, high-grade foci drives a need for high accuracy. Accurate 3D reconstruction method design is impacted by the answers to the following central questions of this work. (1) How does prostate tissue deform during histology processing? (2) What spatial misalignment of the tissue sections is induced by microtome cutting? (3) How does the choice of reconstruction model affect histology reconstruction accuracy? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Histology, paraffin block face and magnetic resonance images were acquired for 18 whole mid-gland tissue slices from six prostates. 7-15 homologous landmarks were identified on each image. Tissue deformation due to histology processing was characterized using the target registration error (TRE) after landmark-based registration under four deformation models (rigid, similarity, affine and thin-plate-spline [TPS]). The misalignment of histology sections from the front faces of tissue slices was quantified using manually identified landmarks. The impact of reconstruction models on the TRE after landmark-based reconstruction was measured under eight reconstruction models comprising one of four deformation models with and without constraining histology images to the tissue slice front faces. RESULTS: Isotropic scaling improved the mean TRE by 0.8-1.0 mm (all results reported as 95% confidence intervals), while skew or TPS deformation improved the mean TRE by <0.1 mm. The mean misalignment was 1.1-1.9(°) (angle) and 0.9-1.3 mm (depth). Using isotropic scaling, the front face constraint raised the mean TRE by 0.6-0.8 mm. CONCLUSIONS: For sub-millimeter accuracy, 3D reconstruction models should not constrain histology images to the tissue slice front faces and should be flexible enough to model isotropic scaling.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3869958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38699582014-01-03 3D prostate histology image reconstruction: Quantifying the impact of tissue deformation and histology section location Gibson, Eli Gaed, Mena Gómez, José A. Moussa, Madeleine Pautler, Stephen Chin, Joseph L. Crukley, Cathie Bauman, Glenn S. Fenster, Aaron Ward, Aaron D. J Pathol Inform Original Article BACKGROUND: Guidelines for localizing prostate cancer on imaging are ideally informed by registered post-prostatectomy histology. 3D histology reconstruction methods can support this by reintroducing 3D spatial information lost during histology processing. The need to register small, high-grade foci drives a need for high accuracy. Accurate 3D reconstruction method design is impacted by the answers to the following central questions of this work. (1) How does prostate tissue deform during histology processing? (2) What spatial misalignment of the tissue sections is induced by microtome cutting? (3) How does the choice of reconstruction model affect histology reconstruction accuracy? MATERIALS AND METHODS: Histology, paraffin block face and magnetic resonance images were acquired for 18 whole mid-gland tissue slices from six prostates. 7-15 homologous landmarks were identified on each image. Tissue deformation due to histology processing was characterized using the target registration error (TRE) after landmark-based registration under four deformation models (rigid, similarity, affine and thin-plate-spline [TPS]). The misalignment of histology sections from the front faces of tissue slices was quantified using manually identified landmarks. The impact of reconstruction models on the TRE after landmark-based reconstruction was measured under eight reconstruction models comprising one of four deformation models with and without constraining histology images to the tissue slice front faces. RESULTS: Isotropic scaling improved the mean TRE by 0.8-1.0 mm (all results reported as 95% confidence intervals), while skew or TPS deformation improved the mean TRE by <0.1 mm. The mean misalignment was 1.1-1.9(°) (angle) and 0.9-1.3 mm (depth). Using isotropic scaling, the front face constraint raised the mean TRE by 0.6-0.8 mm. CONCLUSIONS: For sub-millimeter accuracy, 3D reconstruction models should not constrain histology images to the tissue slice front faces and should be flexible enough to model isotropic scaling. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-10-31 /pmc/articles/PMC3869958/ /pubmed/24392245 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.120874 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Gibson E http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gibson, Eli
Gaed, Mena
Gómez, José A.
Moussa, Madeleine
Pautler, Stephen
Chin, Joseph L.
Crukley, Cathie
Bauman, Glenn S.
Fenster, Aaron
Ward, Aaron D.
3D prostate histology image reconstruction: Quantifying the impact of tissue deformation and histology section location
title 3D prostate histology image reconstruction: Quantifying the impact of tissue deformation and histology section location
title_full 3D prostate histology image reconstruction: Quantifying the impact of tissue deformation and histology section location
title_fullStr 3D prostate histology image reconstruction: Quantifying the impact of tissue deformation and histology section location
title_full_unstemmed 3D prostate histology image reconstruction: Quantifying the impact of tissue deformation and histology section location
title_short 3D prostate histology image reconstruction: Quantifying the impact of tissue deformation and histology section location
title_sort 3d prostate histology image reconstruction: quantifying the impact of tissue deformation and histology section location
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3869958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24392245
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2153-3539.120874
work_keys_str_mv AT gibsoneli 3dprostatehistologyimagereconstructionquantifyingtheimpactoftissuedeformationandhistologysectionlocation
AT gaedmena 3dprostatehistologyimagereconstructionquantifyingtheimpactoftissuedeformationandhistologysectionlocation
AT gomezjosea 3dprostatehistologyimagereconstructionquantifyingtheimpactoftissuedeformationandhistologysectionlocation
AT moussamadeleine 3dprostatehistologyimagereconstructionquantifyingtheimpactoftissuedeformationandhistologysectionlocation
AT pautlerstephen 3dprostatehistologyimagereconstructionquantifyingtheimpactoftissuedeformationandhistologysectionlocation
AT chinjosephl 3dprostatehistologyimagereconstructionquantifyingtheimpactoftissuedeformationandhistologysectionlocation
AT crukleycathie 3dprostatehistologyimagereconstructionquantifyingtheimpactoftissuedeformationandhistologysectionlocation
AT baumanglenns 3dprostatehistologyimagereconstructionquantifyingtheimpactoftissuedeformationandhistologysectionlocation
AT fensteraaron 3dprostatehistologyimagereconstructionquantifyingtheimpactoftissuedeformationandhistologysectionlocation
AT wardaarond 3dprostatehistologyimagereconstructionquantifyingtheimpactoftissuedeformationandhistologysectionlocation