Cargando…

Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators

An increasing number of patients undergoing proton radiotherapy have cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs). We recently encountered a situation in which a high‐voltage coil on a lead from an implanted cardiac defibrillator was located within the clinical treatment volume for a patient recei...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wootton, Landon S., Polf, Jerimy C., Peterson, Stephen, Wilkinson, Jeff, Rozner, Marc A., Balter, Peter A., Beddar, Sam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3869963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22766952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3813
_version_ 1782296645686263808
author Wootton, Landon S.
Polf, Jerimy C.
Peterson, Stephen
Wilkinson, Jeff
Rozner, Marc A.
Balter, Peter A.
Beddar, Sam
author_facet Wootton, Landon S.
Polf, Jerimy C.
Peterson, Stephen
Wilkinson, Jeff
Rozner, Marc A.
Balter, Peter A.
Beddar, Sam
author_sort Wootton, Landon S.
collection PubMed
description An increasing number of patients undergoing proton radiotherapy have cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs). We recently encountered a situation in which a high‐voltage coil on a lead from an implanted cardiac defibrillator was located within the clinical treatment volume for a patient receiving proton radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. To study the effects of the lead on the dose delivery, we placed a high‐Z CIED lead at both the center and the distal edge of a clinical spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) in a water phantom, in both a stationary position and with the lead moving in a periodic pattern to simulate cardiorespiratory movement. We then calculated planned doses using a commercial proton treatment planning system (TPS), and compared them with the doses delivered in the phantom, measured using radiographic film. Dose profiles from TPS‐calculated and measured dose distributions showed large pertubrations in the delivered proton dose in the vicinity of the CIED lead when it was not moving. The TPS predicted perturbations up to 20% and measurements revealed perturbations up to 35%. However, the perturbations were less than 3% when the lead was moving. Greater dose perturbations were seen when the lead was placed at the distal edge of the SOBP than when it was placed in the center of the SOBP. We conclude that although cardiorespiratory motion of the lead mitigates some of the perturbations, the effects of the leads should be considered and steps taken to reduce these effects during the treatment planning process. PACS numbers: 87.55.D‐,87.55.ne, 87.85.M
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3869963
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38699632018-04-02 Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators Wootton, Landon S. Polf, Jerimy C. Peterson, Stephen Wilkinson, Jeff Rozner, Marc A. Balter, Peter A. Beddar, Sam J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics An increasing number of patients undergoing proton radiotherapy have cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs). We recently encountered a situation in which a high‐voltage coil on a lead from an implanted cardiac defibrillator was located within the clinical treatment volume for a patient receiving proton radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. To study the effects of the lead on the dose delivery, we placed a high‐Z CIED lead at both the center and the distal edge of a clinical spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) in a water phantom, in both a stationary position and with the lead moving in a periodic pattern to simulate cardiorespiratory movement. We then calculated planned doses using a commercial proton treatment planning system (TPS), and compared them with the doses delivered in the phantom, measured using radiographic film. Dose profiles from TPS‐calculated and measured dose distributions showed large pertubrations in the delivered proton dose in the vicinity of the CIED lead when it was not moving. The TPS predicted perturbations up to 20% and measurements revealed perturbations up to 35%. However, the perturbations were less than 3% when the lead was moving. Greater dose perturbations were seen when the lead was placed at the distal edge of the SOBP than when it was placed in the center of the SOBP. We conclude that although cardiorespiratory motion of the lead mitigates some of the perturbations, the effects of the leads should be considered and steps taken to reduce these effects during the treatment planning process. PACS numbers: 87.55.D‐,87.55.ne, 87.85.M John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3869963/ /pubmed/22766952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3813 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Wootton, Landon S.
Polf, Jerimy C.
Peterson, Stephen
Wilkinson, Jeff
Rozner, Marc A.
Balter, Peter A.
Beddar, Sam
Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators
title Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators
title_full Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators
title_fullStr Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators
title_full_unstemmed Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators
title_short Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators
title_sort proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3869963/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22766952
http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3813
work_keys_str_mv AT woottonlandons protondoseperturbationscausedbyhighvoltageleadsfromimplantedcardioverterdefibrillators
AT polfjerimyc protondoseperturbationscausedbyhighvoltageleadsfromimplantedcardioverterdefibrillators
AT petersonstephen protondoseperturbationscausedbyhighvoltageleadsfromimplantedcardioverterdefibrillators
AT wilkinsonjeff protondoseperturbationscausedbyhighvoltageleadsfromimplantedcardioverterdefibrillators
AT roznermarca protondoseperturbationscausedbyhighvoltageleadsfromimplantedcardioverterdefibrillators
AT balterpetera protondoseperturbationscausedbyhighvoltageleadsfromimplantedcardioverterdefibrillators
AT beddarsam protondoseperturbationscausedbyhighvoltageleadsfromimplantedcardioverterdefibrillators