Cargando…
Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators
An increasing number of patients undergoing proton radiotherapy have cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs). We recently encountered a situation in which a high‐voltage coil on a lead from an implanted cardiac defibrillator was located within the clinical treatment volume for a patient recei...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3869963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22766952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3813 |
_version_ | 1782296645686263808 |
---|---|
author | Wootton, Landon S. Polf, Jerimy C. Peterson, Stephen Wilkinson, Jeff Rozner, Marc A. Balter, Peter A. Beddar, Sam |
author_facet | Wootton, Landon S. Polf, Jerimy C. Peterson, Stephen Wilkinson, Jeff Rozner, Marc A. Balter, Peter A. Beddar, Sam |
author_sort | Wootton, Landon S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | An increasing number of patients undergoing proton radiotherapy have cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs). We recently encountered a situation in which a high‐voltage coil on a lead from an implanted cardiac defibrillator was located within the clinical treatment volume for a patient receiving proton radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. To study the effects of the lead on the dose delivery, we placed a high‐Z CIED lead at both the center and the distal edge of a clinical spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) in a water phantom, in both a stationary position and with the lead moving in a periodic pattern to simulate cardiorespiratory movement. We then calculated planned doses using a commercial proton treatment planning system (TPS), and compared them with the doses delivered in the phantom, measured using radiographic film. Dose profiles from TPS‐calculated and measured dose distributions showed large pertubrations in the delivered proton dose in the vicinity of the CIED lead when it was not moving. The TPS predicted perturbations up to 20% and measurements revealed perturbations up to 35%. However, the perturbations were less than 3% when the lead was moving. Greater dose perturbations were seen when the lead was placed at the distal edge of the SOBP than when it was placed in the center of the SOBP. We conclude that although cardiorespiratory motion of the lead mitigates some of the perturbations, the effects of the leads should be considered and steps taken to reduce these effects during the treatment planning process. PACS numbers: 87.55.D‐,87.55.ne, 87.85.M |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3869963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38699632018-04-02 Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators Wootton, Landon S. Polf, Jerimy C. Peterson, Stephen Wilkinson, Jeff Rozner, Marc A. Balter, Peter A. Beddar, Sam J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics An increasing number of patients undergoing proton radiotherapy have cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs). We recently encountered a situation in which a high‐voltage coil on a lead from an implanted cardiac defibrillator was located within the clinical treatment volume for a patient receiving proton radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. To study the effects of the lead on the dose delivery, we placed a high‐Z CIED lead at both the center and the distal edge of a clinical spread‐out Bragg peak (SOBP) in a water phantom, in both a stationary position and with the lead moving in a periodic pattern to simulate cardiorespiratory movement. We then calculated planned doses using a commercial proton treatment planning system (TPS), and compared them with the doses delivered in the phantom, measured using radiographic film. Dose profiles from TPS‐calculated and measured dose distributions showed large pertubrations in the delivered proton dose in the vicinity of the CIED lead when it was not moving. The TPS predicted perturbations up to 20% and measurements revealed perturbations up to 35%. However, the perturbations were less than 3% when the lead was moving. Greater dose perturbations were seen when the lead was placed at the distal edge of the SOBP than when it was placed in the center of the SOBP. We conclude that although cardiorespiratory motion of the lead mitigates some of the perturbations, the effects of the leads should be considered and steps taken to reduce these effects during the treatment planning process. PACS numbers: 87.55.D‐,87.55.ne, 87.85.M John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2012-05-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3869963/ /pubmed/22766952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3813 Text en © 2012 The Authors. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Wootton, Landon S. Polf, Jerimy C. Peterson, Stephen Wilkinson, Jeff Rozner, Marc A. Balter, Peter A. Beddar, Sam Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators |
title | Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators |
title_full | Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators |
title_fullStr | Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators |
title_full_unstemmed | Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators |
title_short | Proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators |
title_sort | proton dose perturbations caused by high‐voltage leads from implanted cardioverter defibrillators |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3869963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22766952 http://dx.doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3813 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woottonlandons protondoseperturbationscausedbyhighvoltageleadsfromimplantedcardioverterdefibrillators AT polfjerimyc protondoseperturbationscausedbyhighvoltageleadsfromimplantedcardioverterdefibrillators AT petersonstephen protondoseperturbationscausedbyhighvoltageleadsfromimplantedcardioverterdefibrillators AT wilkinsonjeff protondoseperturbationscausedbyhighvoltageleadsfromimplantedcardioverterdefibrillators AT roznermarca protondoseperturbationscausedbyhighvoltageleadsfromimplantedcardioverterdefibrillators AT balterpetera protondoseperturbationscausedbyhighvoltageleadsfromimplantedcardioverterdefibrillators AT beddarsam protondoseperturbationscausedbyhighvoltageleadsfromimplantedcardioverterdefibrillators |