Cargando…

Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing

The purpose was to evaluate and compare 5 different HER2 genetic assays with different characteristics that could affect the performance to analyze the human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) gene copy number under low and high throughput conditions. The study included 108 tissue samples from breast...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poulsen, Tim S., Espersen, Maiken L. M., Kofoed, Vibeke, Dabetic, Tanja, Høgdall, Estrid, Balslev, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3870126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24383005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/368731
_version_ 1782296666141884416
author Poulsen, Tim S.
Espersen, Maiken L. M.
Kofoed, Vibeke
Dabetic, Tanja
Høgdall, Estrid
Balslev, Eva
author_facet Poulsen, Tim S.
Espersen, Maiken L. M.
Kofoed, Vibeke
Dabetic, Tanja
Høgdall, Estrid
Balslev, Eva
author_sort Poulsen, Tim S.
collection PubMed
description The purpose was to evaluate and compare 5 different HER2 genetic assays with different characteristics that could affect the performance to analyze the human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) gene copy number under low and high throughput conditions. The study included 108 tissue samples from breast cancer patients with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) results scored as 0/1+, 2+, and 3+. HER2 genetic status was analysed using chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Scoring results were documented through digital image analysis. The cancer region of interest was identified from a serial H&E stained slide following tissue cores were transferred to a tissue microarrays (TMA). When using TMA in a routine flow, all patients will be tested for HER2 status with IHC followed by CISH or FISH, thereby providing individual HER2 results. In conclusion, our results show that the differences between the HER2 genetic assays do not have an effect on the analytic performance and the CISH technology is superior to high throughput HER2 genetic testing due to scanning speed, while the IQ-FISH may still be a choice for fast low throughput HER2 genetic testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3870126
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38701262014-01-01 Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing Poulsen, Tim S. Espersen, Maiken L. M. Kofoed, Vibeke Dabetic, Tanja Høgdall, Estrid Balslev, Eva Int J Breast Cancer Research Article The purpose was to evaluate and compare 5 different HER2 genetic assays with different characteristics that could affect the performance to analyze the human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) gene copy number under low and high throughput conditions. The study included 108 tissue samples from breast cancer patients with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) results scored as 0/1+, 2+, and 3+. HER2 genetic status was analysed using chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Scoring results were documented through digital image analysis. The cancer region of interest was identified from a serial H&E stained slide following tissue cores were transferred to a tissue microarrays (TMA). When using TMA in a routine flow, all patients will be tested for HER2 status with IHC followed by CISH or FISH, thereby providing individual HER2 results. In conclusion, our results show that the differences between the HER2 genetic assays do not have an effect on the analytic performance and the CISH technology is superior to high throughput HER2 genetic testing due to scanning speed, while the IQ-FISH may still be a choice for fast low throughput HER2 genetic testing. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3870126/ /pubmed/24383005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/368731 Text en Copyright © 2013 Tim S. Poulsen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Poulsen, Tim S.
Espersen, Maiken L. M.
Kofoed, Vibeke
Dabetic, Tanja
Høgdall, Estrid
Balslev, Eva
Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing
title Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing
title_full Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing
title_fullStr Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing
title_short Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing
title_sort comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromogenic in situ hybridization for low and high throughput her2 genetic testing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3870126/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24383005
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/368731
work_keys_str_mv AT poulsentims comparisonoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationandchromogenicinsituhybridizationforlowandhighthroughputher2genetictesting
AT espersenmaikenlm comparisonoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationandchromogenicinsituhybridizationforlowandhighthroughputher2genetictesting
AT kofoedvibeke comparisonoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationandchromogenicinsituhybridizationforlowandhighthroughputher2genetictesting
AT dabetictanja comparisonoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationandchromogenicinsituhybridizationforlowandhighthroughputher2genetictesting
AT høgdallestrid comparisonoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationandchromogenicinsituhybridizationforlowandhighthroughputher2genetictesting
AT balsleveva comparisonoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationandchromogenicinsituhybridizationforlowandhighthroughputher2genetictesting