Cargando…
Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing
The purpose was to evaluate and compare 5 different HER2 genetic assays with different characteristics that could affect the performance to analyze the human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) gene copy number under low and high throughput conditions. The study included 108 tissue samples from breast...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3870126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24383005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/368731 |
_version_ | 1782296666141884416 |
---|---|
author | Poulsen, Tim S. Espersen, Maiken L. M. Kofoed, Vibeke Dabetic, Tanja Høgdall, Estrid Balslev, Eva |
author_facet | Poulsen, Tim S. Espersen, Maiken L. M. Kofoed, Vibeke Dabetic, Tanja Høgdall, Estrid Balslev, Eva |
author_sort | Poulsen, Tim S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose was to evaluate and compare 5 different HER2 genetic assays with different characteristics that could affect the performance to analyze the human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) gene copy number under low and high throughput conditions. The study included 108 tissue samples from breast cancer patients with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) results scored as 0/1+, 2+, and 3+. HER2 genetic status was analysed using chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Scoring results were documented through digital image analysis. The cancer region of interest was identified from a serial H&E stained slide following tissue cores were transferred to a tissue microarrays (TMA). When using TMA in a routine flow, all patients will be tested for HER2 status with IHC followed by CISH or FISH, thereby providing individual HER2 results. In conclusion, our results show that the differences between the HER2 genetic assays do not have an effect on the analytic performance and the CISH technology is superior to high throughput HER2 genetic testing due to scanning speed, while the IQ-FISH may still be a choice for fast low throughput HER2 genetic testing. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3870126 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38701262014-01-01 Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing Poulsen, Tim S. Espersen, Maiken L. M. Kofoed, Vibeke Dabetic, Tanja Høgdall, Estrid Balslev, Eva Int J Breast Cancer Research Article The purpose was to evaluate and compare 5 different HER2 genetic assays with different characteristics that could affect the performance to analyze the human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) gene copy number under low and high throughput conditions. The study included 108 tissue samples from breast cancer patients with HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) results scored as 0/1+, 2+, and 3+. HER2 genetic status was analysed using chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Scoring results were documented through digital image analysis. The cancer region of interest was identified from a serial H&E stained slide following tissue cores were transferred to a tissue microarrays (TMA). When using TMA in a routine flow, all patients will be tested for HER2 status with IHC followed by CISH or FISH, thereby providing individual HER2 results. In conclusion, our results show that the differences between the HER2 genetic assays do not have an effect on the analytic performance and the CISH technology is superior to high throughput HER2 genetic testing due to scanning speed, while the IQ-FISH may still be a choice for fast low throughput HER2 genetic testing. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013 2013-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3870126/ /pubmed/24383005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/368731 Text en Copyright © 2013 Tim S. Poulsen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Poulsen, Tim S. Espersen, Maiken L. M. Kofoed, Vibeke Dabetic, Tanja Høgdall, Estrid Balslev, Eva Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing |
title | Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing |
title_full | Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing |
title_short | Comparison of Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization and Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Low and High Throughput HER2 Genetic Testing |
title_sort | comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and chromogenic in situ hybridization for low and high throughput her2 genetic testing |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3870126/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24383005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/368731 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poulsentims comparisonoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationandchromogenicinsituhybridizationforlowandhighthroughputher2genetictesting AT espersenmaikenlm comparisonoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationandchromogenicinsituhybridizationforlowandhighthroughputher2genetictesting AT kofoedvibeke comparisonoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationandchromogenicinsituhybridizationforlowandhighthroughputher2genetictesting AT dabetictanja comparisonoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationandchromogenicinsituhybridizationforlowandhighthroughputher2genetictesting AT høgdallestrid comparisonoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationandchromogenicinsituhybridizationforlowandhighthroughputher2genetictesting AT balsleveva comparisonoffluorescenceinsituhybridizationandchromogenicinsituhybridizationforlowandhighthroughputher2genetictesting |